Which alignment does each champion belong too?

Okay, here we go. Note that this is all assumptions and opinion (btw, I'm of the opinion that lawful can imply close-minded loyalty to the law, without judging on your own [Sorry for the massive post]). Unknown, but I assume NE Was TN or CN, but is now NG or CG NG, but under Shen strives to be TN …I'm not sure. Is his lore updated? Unknown. Probably TN just because he's so childlike NG See Alistar NG EDIT: CN He's probably considered good, but I have to go with LN So far above us that he can't be judged. Unknown NG CE NG NG CN with good deep down hmm… CG but with over-loyalty to the family CE See Alistar Loyal to Swain CG Batsh t insane. Does that mean CE or CN? Alignment based on narcissism CG NE Unknown TN with heroic tendencies Unknown LN CG See Alistar Hard to say. He ruled Bilgewater with an iron fist, but he kept gang-crime in check. Out of love for his nation? Hard to say. LG See Amumu CG CN CE See Alistar Meant to help people fulfill their destiny, whatever it may be See Alistar NG NG NG Unknown LG CE See Mundo LN NG CE, but legit thinks he's CG LG, but lore not updated See Cassiopeia See Kassadin CG, but under Shen strives to be TN CN See Bard The only law of Noxus is strength (chaotic whatever) CN, but too childlike to judge Unknown Strives to be TN? LG, but since "ascension" leaning NG LE LG, but since his wife "died," CG actions with CN motive CN or CG. Hard to tell with Yordles NG, but with over-loyalty to the family/crown See Alistar I thought he was CE, but he might be TN with CE actions NG Strives for TN EDIT: CG but has gone CE for revenge against GP NE See Alistar NG LG with NG tendencies See Alistar See Alistar Unknown, but assumed CE NG, but too childlike to judge CN In life, NG, but it's a little harder to tell with robot cyborgs Almost see Bard, but I'm'a go with NE Believes in LG, but leans NG NG Unknown CE See Mundo Literally just a guy who really likes hunting. Probably LN or TN CG striving for NG See Alistar LG or NG Motives are CG, actions can be viewed as CN Unknown. See Mundo Probably the most TN a human can get. Unwavering TN CN, but CG thanks to J4 CE CN with see Mundo tendencies CN CG See Alistar LG or NG Unknown CN NE NG but LG actions due to lack of information See Cassiopeia NG See Alistar CE See Lulu NE CN see Alistar CN Unknown NG See Alistar Willingly became more chaotic for revenge, but legit revenge. I'm not sure LN CE with CG motives CN CG …NG in his own way C-Unknown CG Chaotic CG CG, under Yi strives for TN EDIT: Originally CG motives, but now CE with CE motives NG, but maybe over-loyal to the crown CN CG NG with chaotic tendencies Can be argued as NG, CG, or CN See Lulu See Alistar CN

First, why did I put so much effort into this. Second, please discuss these with me. I like this topic (Let's hope I didn't mess up and put the wrong champion portrait somewhere).

Morgana is more chaotic good that chaotic evil.

The problem is the alignment system is not exactly precise. It turns out trying to dictate complex philosophical and moral realities into a two-axis system is hard. Who knew?

For example I could see a reason to claim Jhin is Lawful Evil, Neutral Evil, and Chaotic Evil. I could even see a reason why someone would claim Jhin isn't evil at all. I'd think they were crazy, but I've seen it done before.

It also doesn't help that the system itself has been rewritten a few times since its first introduction.

So, if you want to know, I'd ask you a few questions.

On the Lawful/Chaotic axis, which do you consider more important, following personal codes or following societal codes? This is a huge distinction, if you just look at one of the most common examples given in this system: Robin Hood. Robin Hood broke societal code repeatedly, stealing from the rich and fighting King John and the Sheriff. So, clearly that's Chaotic, right? But John's reign was legitimate, and Robin was gathering money not just for the poor that were being unjustly taxed, but to raise money for the return of the true King Richard. So taken that way, he's clearly firmly Lawful. Honestly, he becomes one of the most Lawful characters in the setting. Even Friar Tuck compromised his morals a few times, Robin never does.

What is Good/Evil? If someone thinks they're helping people but is really making their lives fundamentally worse, or even kills them are they good because of their intentions or evil because of their actions? What is amoral? Can there be creatures above good and evil, or is that just an excuse for the evil who don't wish to be judged?

Anyway, if I would go what I view the characters as (and I'm sure many would disagree for the reasons I listed above) it would be something like this (just posting characters I have a decent grasp on):

Aatrox: NE Ahri: CE but trying to repent as she gains humanity Ashe: LG Aurelion Sol: TN with some evil leanings due to apathy toward killing lower lifeforms Azir: LN with maybe good leanings due to trying to free his slaves Bard: LN entirely gut reaction. We don't know his motives or what the hell he's doing, but he seems to have some code for his actions Brand: CE Braum: LG Cassiopeia: NE Cho'Gath: NE Darius: LN with both good and bad leanings depending on your thoughts on military expansion Diana: CN Dr. Mundo: NE Draven: NE his job is necessary, but his obvious sadism with it pushes him to Evil in my mind Ekko: CN with Good leanings Elise: NE Fiora: LN based solely on how seriously she takes the rules of dueling. Gangplank: NE Garen: LG or LN depending on further details Gnar: CN Gragas: CN Graves: CN with some evil leanings Illaoi: LE with neutral leanings Jhin: NE Jinx: CE Kled: CE Leona: NG as a child LN with evil leanings as an adult then unknown after possession Miss Fortune: TN with maybe more evil than she would admit in her Pantheon: little bitch Shaco: CE Shen: LN Swain: NE with lawful leanings (entirely based on my interpretation of him, I will admit) Wukong: CN with good leanings Veigar: EVIL!!!! Zac: CG Ziggs: TN despite his penchant for explosives I don't think he's ever done anything good, bad, chaotic, or lawful. He just likes explosives

Is Jinx really chaotic evil? I know she causes mayhem, but I don't recall her lore ever so much as mentioning her killing anyone.

In most cases I'd say it is rather hard to pin a champ down into one alignment. I mean where would you put ?

She tries to help people,so that is good. But her help can also kill you and she might do this against your will,so that could be seen as evil. You could also see her as morally neutral,because her actions are neither completely evil,nor completely good.

Then there is the fact that she follows the teachings of her religion,so she could be seen as lawful. But said religion basically says live your life like you want,which is chaotic. And again you could see her as neutral in this aspect as well,since she does care about her teachings to some extent,but is also said to do some rather unusual stuff as well(bringing her religion to bilgewater was her idea).

So in the end you can put Illaoi anywhere on the alignment chart.

Neutral Evil Thresh only really cares about inflicting pain and will turn on his allies the moment they get in the way of this (not that they would). Neutral Evil is basically just that: someone who sides with whoever and harms whoever they need to to further their own personal goals. However, thresh is very close to being chaotic evil.

Chaotic Neutral Jinx is an anarchist who loves to cause panic and blow things up because she just wants to have fun. She possibly doesn't even see a difference between good and evil or much care if there is one. Jinx would probably terrorize Piltover even if everyone there was evil. This is why I think she is chaotic neutral and not evil. Chaotic evil is when someone wants to cause harm for the sake of causing harm. Jinx just blows things up and doesn't care if people are hurt in the process, because its fun.

You can read the alignment descriptions here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alignment_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons)#Neutral_evil