Why following God-King Darius is pointless.

Warlord Rhinark·6/28/2018, 3:58:45 PM·8 votes·5,341 views

#DISCLAIMER: This is just my own personal opinion. Feel free to disagree in the comments below.

So I've been seeing a lot of people complaining that Garen is a tyrant and anything is better than serving under him, right?

Well I'd like to point out why following God-King Darius is the worst thing you can do.

Let's start with the basics.

Serving Garen means you have a fully functional society, governed by strict laws and basically the eradication of free will.

Following Darius, however, means you are an individual and you seek to end Garen's reign of tyranny and bring power back to the people.

But here's the thing I'm afraid people don't realise: Darius' end goal in this.

Darius seeks to kill Garen, and then what?

It's not like Darius plans to take over after him.

No, Darius doesn't want anyone to take over after Garen.

In the "Where Power Lies" trailer, we can clearly hear the narrator say "Versus one without" when referring to someone ruling over the world.

Darius wants to cause chaos.

After Garen has died, Darius' followers will most likely turn on eachother in order to be the next to succeed.

Society will collapse and the world will become governed by the strong.

And what will the strong become? They'll just become the exact same tyrants that Garen was.

Siding with Darius doesn't mean the end of tyrants, it means the creation of even more.

Populations world-wide will drastically drop and evantually humanity will go extinct.

And, I don't know about you, but serving a cruel tyrant that actually keeps shit together sounds WAY better to me, than serving a warmonger that seeks to end humanity by promising everyone that what they're fighting for is "freedom" and "individuality" when, in the end, he only wants to cause endless war.

But that's just what I gathered from it.

Feel free to post your own thoughts below.

35 Comments

Stars Shaper6/28/2018, 4:01:53 PM8 votes

I just realized something funny:

Vs event got released just after the new Darkin lore, in which the Ascended without a boss have gone rampart for centuries causing countless victims and wars and then they get deleted by Targon... Hmmmmmm....

Chembaron Yamada6/28/2018, 10:27:04 PM2 votes

I am very well aware that Darius brings Chaos and leaves us in a state of fighting every day for survival. It's just that I value freedom of mind extremely high and think it is worth fighting for, even if that means that we have to fight forever for ourselves.

Giving up our free will is no option.

Meep Man6/28/2018, 6:38:19 PM2 votes

The wisest statement to make in this war is that neither side is good. They are both pretty evil. War doesn't decide who is right. It decides who is left. You are basically just choosing the lesser of two evils based on your opinion.

TakaDama6/28/2018, 9:24:45 PM2 votes

I'd argue living with repressed free will isn't truly living at all. It is actually a pretty sad experience actually if you take into account the possibility of distinct social classes under Garen's rule (i.e. potential slavery).

This is why I like Noxus as a faction and Darius as a character and as the best candidate for God King: even if one does rule over the rest, he doesn't tolerate complacency. If you find yourself unsatisfied with life, you take life in your hands and mold it to your satisfaction.

Hyquiem6/29/2018, 6:35:14 AM2 votes

I chose Garen simply because he had the better sides.. especially that romance between Garen item 3681 Katarina temptations..

VelvetCrotch6/28/2018, 5:28:50 PM1 votes

i dont support arrogant despots, sry. and if they kill each other: that's natural selection

Tesla Effect6/28/2018, 11:38:37 PM1 votes

Anarchy is dumb in every situation it was used. Darius represents anarchy, because of that I dont care for him.

DrCyanide6/28/2018, 5:37:41 PM1 votes

One of the text segments that Surrender at 20 posted mentioned that it's Darius's hope that someone will rise up to be able to defeat him. So while he won't take up a leadership mantle, his followers would still have some purpose/organization as they try to become rivals capable of beating him. To beat a god king would require organization and order, but not the tyranny of Garen. It'd likely be more comparable to the Spartans of ancient Greece.

Makarakarn6/29/2018, 11:54:59 AM1 votes

So what you're saying here is that we have to pick between authoritarianism and anarchism? Fun stuff lmao

KronosXVIIII6/29/2018, 7:56:14 AM1 votes

I’d still rather it than with garen, where one wrong word showing any sort of disagreement with him will get you smited immediately