Just Like How we Voted Battlecast Illaoi...

6FlagsFunnelCake·3/19/2018, 10:19:46 PM·3 votes·282 views

Riot should do something similar for a Champion instead. Not exactly to vote on it or to necessarily change it to the Player's immediate needs or anything, but just to let people see the scope of how a Champion is made and how much of a process it is.

4 Comments

Tormentula3/19/2018, 11:27:50 PM4 votes

It would take a lot more time and effort for them to pull that off.

There's a lot of shit going on when developing new champs, like even the illaoi skin we voted for didn't make it far with the original concept presented to us (rip armacles). There's a lot of things that just don't work and riot doesn't know until they try.

For all we know, we could vote for a champ that's impossible to even develop. We wouldn't be that hyped for it either since we know what we're getting.

Would rather them do it for skins occasionally tbh.

The DrBonjigollo3/19/2018, 11:15:39 PM2 votes

I'd appreciate this. I'd love to see a little more of the process besides the understanding "we sit at a table and talk about it." Though I'd also like to vote on something minor like "should we make a support, mage, or jungler support next" or some small-ish kit details like no mobility assassin or a hyper mobile support that doesn't dish healz, shields and cc like Rakan but rather some other type of utility, whoo knows.

thecowley3/20/2018, 7:47:16 AM1 votes

I'd like the concept for a champ. Could be easy to do things like gender, faction, hero or villain and role.

Digielf3/20/2018, 8:58:55 AM1 votes

But the voting ended as a clear failure, we did not get Battlecast Illaoi which was clearly the winner, we got a lower quality skin with different title, different clothes and different splash art which lost all the meaning and made the entire voting event useless