(Item Concept): Spell blades, hybrid AP/AD lategame itemization!

Transient Spell-sword http://mgc.florastatic.com/180x135/43/431414-0.jpg +30 Attack Damage +30 Ability Power Unique Passive: +10% Cooldown reduction

Recipe: + + 325 Gold Total Cost: 2000 Gold efficiency: 100.125% Efficient

Shining Runeblade http://i.imgur.com/ML5Oe8M.jpg +60 Attack Damage (+74) +70 Ability Power (+82) Unique Passive: +10% Cooldown reduction Unique Passive: Gain an additional 20% of your bonus AP as AD and gain 20% of your bonus AD as AP Recipe: + + http://mgc.florastatic.com/180x135/43/431414-0.jpg + + 1050 Gold Total Cost: 4600 Gold Gold Efficiency (Without Passive): 85.27% Efficient Gold Efficiency (With Passive on this item itself): 95.07% Efficient Estimate of gold value of passive (Assuming as a "Best Case" build): +50 AD / 1260 Gold +54 AP / 913.5 Gold 2924.5 Gold Gold efficiency (With Estimated "Best Case" Passive): 148.84% Efficient

Champions these items may be strong on: Reason: Hybrid itemization is extremely limited, with the only real examples being and . Hybrid itemization is an interesting avenue that champions can take to make them harder to itemize against, as well as being more interesting, due to considerations that need to be made: For example if you build armor, you need to think about dodging or otherwise mitigating their AP abilities. In addition, encourages hybrid itemization by making it a very strong late-game item, with careful considerations being made for the price.

What do you think? Is Hybrid itemizations a flawed concept? Should champions like and be given more support to build both AD and AP in game? Does it make champions who have one strong AP ratio such as and more interesting to play?