Let's talk about the (M)CCC

Sir ArmaMalum·Oct 30, 2014·8 votes·3,066 views

Hey guys, for anyone who hasn't been keeping track, the CCC (The Board's Champion Concept Contest) and the MCCC (The vBulletin's Champion Concept Contest) will be merging this next month. How this will work is actually quite simple: I'll be co-hosting with MobyTheWhite for the November MCCC.

Now this isn't to say that I'm just tossing the MCCC hosts the reigns and walking away after the November contest, in fact I'm using this opportunity to see how the MCCC hosts do things and what I can take away from it. The MCCC has been running for a few years, whereas the CCC (the one I hosted) was/is at this point a few months old, so I imagine I will be.

To start (I'm planning on revisiting this topic a fe times this month), I wanted to talk about two things:

1) The Board's limitations on the old MCCC format

(What I mean by this are things like the reduced character limit/discussion view preventing in-thread concept entry. As well as the limited formatting capability available right now. For better or worse, things will need to change to fit the new surroundings.)

and

2) What people want out of a champion concept contest

To expand on 2) I've already had scattered but good conversations about what hosts want out of a concept contest. As an example, I'm personally more for a low barrier of entry mosh-pit to better encourage newcomers while still highlighting the greats. Whereas another viewpoint (also completely valid) is to have challenges and a general high barrier of entry so we can see a downright amazing titan of a concept at the end.

There are other views of course but I want to pick everyone's brains as far as what's wanted out of a Champion Concept Contest and how we can make it better!

P.S. Anyone who prefers to use discussion (nested) view, please be courteous to those who prefer chronological and quote the comment you are replying to.

40 Comments

FlintfallOct 30, 20146 votes

I think Othello explained a lot of my thoughts perfectly, but I have a few more things to add regarding the CCC:

I like how with the CCC I can submit my concept as it is, I don't have to change my vision of it to match requirements.
I agree that the CCC feels fairly distant in that it isn't engaging, DMC did a post for predictions and whatnot which to me breathed a bit more life. Small things like progress reports, little side contest things (no judging, just a creative process like make a kit for this archetype), and just general discussion threads about each other's concepts could go a really long way.
Don't make it hard for people to join, that's always been the biggest thing for me. The CCC imo isn't too biased to veterans, I could be wrong, but the first winner wasn't too experienced in the concepting field and simply had a great idea. At any rate, veterans will almost always have better constructed concepts regardless if structure is given to them or not.
More requirements don't necessarily add up to a titan concept in the end, it could simply end up showing the concept that best fits the theme of the contest (in some instances).

Either way, I love what each contest is doing!

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

I agree that the CCC feels fairly distant in that it isn't engaging, DMC did a post for predictions and whatnot which to me breathed a bit more life. Small things like progress reports, little side contest things (no judging, just a creative process like make a kit for this archetype), and just general discussion threads about each other's concepts could go a really long way.

I love these ideas! I will also take the blame for the distance as of late. I was so focused on getting the judge-side smoothed out (still not 100% there either) I completely neglected the entrant side.

The CCC imo isn't too biased to veterans

Personally I also think this was because the CCC wasn't until very recently an expected thing to happen. Once next month's contest was a thing to build for there would be better constructed posts by veterans and they would, in my eyes, naturally rise over. I don't think that would necessarily be a bad thing unless it was the same people winning each time.

More requirements don't necessarily add up to a titan concept in the end, it could simply end up showing the concept that best fits the theme of the contest (in some instances).

Completely agree, dependent on the challenges themselves, timeline and everything else. Bit of an over-broad example, sorry.

Othello the CatOct 31, 20142 votes

In regards to the challenges and requirements, while they don't always lead up to a titanic concept, they can become incredible if done properly, and if the challenges aren't Lore-based. Still Eternity's Tarot Card challenge made for a great challenge and a great idea, so tons of people entered and tons of great concepts were made. Miaolong's Martial Arts Madness challenges, while they're restrictive in terms of Lore, usually allowed enough creative wiggle room while still staying to the general theme. It really depends on the person making the challenges.

Othello the CatOct 30, 20144 votes

Well, after entering and participating in both contests, here's what I like and dislike about each:

MCCC: Pros:

Challenges make it so the concept fits a theme and is 100% original. More of a challenge and more stimulating creativity-wise.
Due to the greater sense of community and willingness to critique and judge between contestants, a concept can be refined so it can be the best it can be.
A schedule makes the creation less stressful, as you don't need to get every bit of the champion done right away. You can get the concept done when you feel like it.
Anyone can host the MCCC. If you feel creative enough to make a theme but don't feel like making a champion, you are allowed to host.

Cons:

Lack or reliability with scores and judgements make it hard for large groups.
Relatively tough for new concept creators, and the challenges can restrict people in some ways.
Certain members are typically hostile to the host if they feel like they deserve a better score.

CCC Pros:

Very friendly to newcomers, as you can submit a champion you've had stirring in your head for a while.
Judges are anonymous so you don't know who gave you a good score or a bad score. Also, there's no way to pander to judges.
Formatting of the results is very clean and readable.

Cons:

Lack of a community aside from a congratulations at the end.
A short window of time to make an entire champion can be stressful for some.
Newcomers can get overshadowed easily as veterans can blow them out of the water with unique mechanics and interactions a new designer wouldn't think of yet.
Little to no challenges to make this any bit difficult aside from a bonus short story.

Anyway, that's just what I've found. If there's a way we can get all the good qualities in, I'd be happy. But, I'm just one opinion.

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

Well, after entering and participating in both contests, here's what I like and dislike about each:

Love this breakdown, and would also like to add a con for the CCC in that constructive feedback to concepts was very low comparatively. Whether that's something that could be better fixed systematically or simply organically (expectations of judges and what not) I do not know.

Fair points, Othello. One major bullet I will point to is the formatting. From what I've seen the formatting of the central post was usually very haphazard and came off as a bit hard to follow for people who didn't already know what to look for. Back n the old forums I can imagine this was just accepted and dealt with over time, but now that everyone's on the Boards this problem is going to be compounded with the limited formatting.

Othello the CatOct 30, 20142 votes

Oh, and another pro for the CCC is the fact that it gets its judgements done on time. You have no idea how relieved I was to see that you set a date for results and got them done by said date.

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

Oh, and another pro for the CCC is the fact that it gets its judgments done on time. You have no idea how relieved I was to see that you set a date for results and got them done by said date.

Is that so? lol, well I can say it was by a bit of trial and error from the first few months.

Still EternityOct 31, 20144 votes

I've always felt the true point of the MCCC wasn't really to find the very best concept that ever was; No, it was rather a sort of educational program designed to test those who truly wished to create concepts have a workspace where they could be challenged by restrictions and requirements to test their mettle as designers. I've always hoped that the MCCC could be a social contest where everyone comes to learn everyone and a whole community is born of it.

I would prefer the element of challenge persist if we are to merge our two concepts together. This has always been my personal vision for the MCCC, and I'd hate to see it completely eliminated.

If you have any questions, concerns, or further opinions you'd like to ask me, feel free to do so.

And yes Elp, Chronological is the only way to actually have a conversation.

The Core AugurNov 1, 20143 votes

The man takes a drag from a cigarette. He doesn't actually smoke, so the gesture is mimed in an astoundingly tool-ish way.

"The way I see it, mes amis," he takes another pretentious puff from his fake cigarette, "I'll be here."

He leans back in his chair and kicks his feet up upon the table.

"Just wouldn't be right if I weren't," he glances, askance, in your direction, "non?"

Suddenly, he leans forward, putting the cigarette out in the pewter ashtray, "And so what if they've changed the forums? To hell with'm! We'll just need to tailor my formatting to fit the forums. Show'm that some half-assed Reddit style can't keep us down! Who's with me, camarades?"

HashtagWhatAreYouDoingCoreStahp

RaptameiNov 1, 20141 votes

HashtagWhatAreYouDoingCoreStahp

#* #ProperHashtag*

#Title Text Style

Did you

know there are

three ways to use bullets?
One, you shoot them at the forum designers
- Two, you nest them

You substitute them with any number and it numbers them automatically

~~This board is awesome~~ This board still sucks eggs!

######Whee

NagirteNov 3, 20142 votes

I would honestly like an option in the mccc for concepts to have a full lore and basic kit OR a full, eligible kit and a basic/partial lore for at least the first week. I tend to think about an interesting archetype and kit and develop the actual character and lore afterward. Honestly that's a big reason I'm late/not submitting for mccc a because I don't have the lore done to my liking yet.

But back on topic, I did kind of feel like there wasn't any reason to really check back on the ccc thread after I submitted my entry. It felt like we were just kind of waiting around for the judgements.

ZanryuOct 30, 20141 votes

A huge problem of the MCCC was always the clarity. The main post was mostly a huge wall of text and if you wanted to search for specific entry, you had to reroll all posts until you found it. This is something I saw in the October edition as well as some people tryed to compress their champion into a reply. I guess I don't need to mention that this sucks up a lot of space within the post itself and restricts the entrant itself due to the character limits. This is why I always prefer a list of all entrants within the main post.

Something I also saw in the October Edition where no-go mechanics as requirements. Generally I have nothing against requirements and restrictions because they add a bit of guideline towards the champions. However if they're chosen blindly, like in this case, they can destroy the whole contest for some people. Not to mention that certain requirements can also frighten other people who thought about entering.

In general the host has to find the mediocrity between guideline and restriction to create a contest everybody can enjoy.

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20142 votes

One thing that I was very surprised to hear was that the MCCC really didn't have an agreed upon template of some kind. I'm sure a few traits carried over month month because they were good ideas, but I'm surprised at the structure for such a long running tradition. Not necessarily a bad thing, but has there ever been an attempt at partial standardization or anything that you know of Zanryu?

ElphrihaimOct 30, 20141 votes

One thing that I was very surprised to hear was that the MCCC really didn't have an agreed upon template of some kind. I'm sure a few traits carried over month month because they were good ideas, but I'm surprised at the structure for such a long running tradition. Not necessarily a bad thing, but has there ever been an attempt at partial standardization or anything that you know of Zanryu?

Yes.

"First week", "second week", "third week", and "judging [fourth week]" has been standard for each MCCC. As has a general formatting, placing all the things in quotes. I could go do a Boards conversion of some contests to show that off, if it'd help. Moby's was completely unformatted, and I believe that was mostly true of the original Forums post as well. Sections would be labelled and identifiable by quote blocks breaking and the opening lines of a given quote block.

Sometimes people don't submit any revisions for the second week, and show a whole finished idea on the third week-- The Core Augur being the most memorable to me.

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

Yes.

"First week", "second week", "third week", and "judging [fourth week]" has been standard for each MCCC. As has a general formatting, placing all the things in quotes. I could go do a Boards conversion of some contests to show that off, if it'd help. Moby's was completely unformatted, and I believe that was mostly true of the original Forums post as well. Sections would be labelled and identifiable by quote blocks breaking and the opening lines of a given quote block.

Sometimes people don't submit any revisions for the second week, and show a whole finished idea on the third week-- The Core Augur being the most memorable to me.

Ah ok, that makes sense. No need I know what you mean. I also haven't given the MCCC much of a chance to acclimate just yet, so we'll see how it goes.

I do need to catch up on the history of the MCCC, as well. Has there ever been a time where a month of the MCCC flopped due to a host's actions? If so, what was the action taken if any?

Othello the CatOct 30, 20141 votes

Yes, there have been times where that happens. Either a new host steps up and makes a second contest or the existing host makes a new contest. The old one is scrapped and forgotten.

Othello the CatOct 30, 20142 votes

Yeah, to be completely honest, Moby hasn't been on the forums for a long time, so I don't think he'd benused to the new formatting. If Miaolong, Still Eternity or I hosted, then you might see something a bit more clear and visually appealing.

RaptameiOct 30, 20141 votes

Bump for hot thread sort.

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

Thank you kindly

ElphrihaimOct 30, 20141 votes

To add on to what Othello said,

MCCC Pros:

Contestant numbers become limited because the concept has to be almost entirely original to the competition. This makes...

Judges give more deep feedback on each concept.

Cons:

The lower number of judges (usually) creates a bias for certain styles, depending on who is the host.

The contest can feel exclusive because of how challenging it is, with a higher barrier to entry.

Hmm. I guess... I think what should be is a middle ground contest. Something that inherits both the accessibility of the CCC with the setup of the MCCC (schedules, doing champions by part) would be ideal in my mind, but the Boards are anathema to being able to do that. Raptamei and I attempted such a thing, and ended up needing many posts for each part of our character. (I believe I totaled 5 and Raptamei 6, but I am not certain)

Sir ArmaMalumOct 30, 20141 votes

Hmm. I guess... I think what should be is a middle ground contest. Something that inherits both the accessibility of the CCC with the setup of the MCCC (schedules, doing champions by part) would be ideal in my mind, but the Boards are anathema to being able to do that. Raptamei and I attempted such a thing, and ended up needing many posts for each part of our character. (I believe I totaled 5 and Raptamei 6, but I am not certain)

In a perfect world, eh? I hear you.

You actually bring up another topic that I want to talk about, primarily to conceptors who love putting their concepts into several pages. (i.e. you, Raptemei)

Concept length is definitely an issue, both for the Board's limitations as well as judging time. If we want to have a central contest we have to be ready to handle a large number of entrants as I'm sure you're aware. However the Boards have a major difference from vBulletin. they're International. (Also holds an issue for RP prizes that I ran into as well)

Needless to say, if everything goes well the number of entrants will continue to rise, which in turn makes it much more difficult to give long concepts the same chance as shorter ones within the short span of 2-3 weeks. I can tell you that 42 entries of comparatively short concepts was starting to push it for 3 people (granted it was also the CCC's first month).

Thoughts?

RaptameiOct 30, 20141 votes

Raptamei and I attempted such a thing, and ended up needing many posts for each part of our character. (I believe I totaled 5 and Raptamei 6, but I am not certain)

I did cram the entire thing into one post trololol. Trundle

ElphrihaimOct 30, 20141 votes

I do need to catch up on the history of the MCCC, as well. Has there ever been a time where a month of the MCCC flopped due to a host's actions? If so, what was the action taken if any?

A few times, though rarely due to the host's own actions, more that the challenges given weren't lending themselves to new creations. I know that the 2014 August Rework Lab (MiaoLong) was changed out for another Martial Arts Madness because not a lot of people wanted to do it, and because the previous contest was somewhat damaged (Though I can't remember WHY it was).

In a perfect world, eh? I hear you.

You actually bring up another topic that I want to talk about, primarily to conceptors who love putting their concepts into several pages. (i.e. you, Raptemei)

Huh? I don't like putting my "concepts into several pages", I like giving all the details on a character.

Concept length is definitely an issue, both for the Board's limitations as well as judging time. If we want to have a central contest we have to be ready to handle a large number of entrants as I'm sure you're aware. However the Boards have a major difference from vBulletin. they're International. (Also holds an issue for RP prizes that I ran into as well)

Yeah, this is also difficult. I think that the judgment time of the MCCC works fine, myself, but I guess that that is at least in part due to the fact that the number of concepts that get through the entire MCCC is smaller... since the requirements are more strict.

Needless to say, if everything goes well the number of entrants will continue to rise, which in turn makes it much more difficult to give long concepts the same chance as shorter ones within the short span of 2-3 weeks. I can tell you that 42 entries of comparatively short concepts was starting to push it for 3 people (granted it was also the CCC's first month).

Hmm. I'm... unsure. I, personally, only had a small difficulty when I judged the April? MCCC, because I underestimated how difficult my school projects would actually be, but I believe I finished them all in time (with nowhere near the depth I would have liked to use for the last few, which led to me revising my scores once it was pointed out to me)...

In the MCCC, the judges usually score by themselves and then add the scores to get a total, is that how it is done for the CCC? I would have to know more about your process of choice to really be evaluating it.

[Chronological view is still the only real way to have a discussion, in my head...]

Sir ArmaMalumOct 31, 20141 votes

[Chronological view is still the only real way to have a discussion, in my head...]

To each their own, no problem. Hopefully me quoting you is working out all right?

Huh? I don't like putting my "concepts into several pages", I like giving all the details on a character.

Sorry, didn't mean to imply anything. Simply that a conceptor hailing from the MCCC, from my observations, is on average much longer than someone who was 'brought up' on the CCC. That's awesome don't get me wrong, but as I beleive we both agree the Boards do not provide a good medium for posts of that length.

In the MCCC, the judges usually score by themselves and then add the scores to get a total, is that how it is done for the CCC? I would have to know more about your process of choice to really be evaluating it.

I can help you out there. So what happens is I take volunteer judges via e-mail, confirm they are expected to judge all concepts within 2 weeks and also make sure they know not to reveal they are a judge this month. Starting the first I take entries, if they're A) not a repeat B) entering their own concept and not someone else's and C) have at least a kit and lore finished by time of entry the I take them.

I put all of their information (concept name, author name, and URL) into a Google Drive spreadsheet (example from last month) as they come in. Each judge has their own column in the spreadsheet where they enter their scores, as well any annotations they have to the right. Judging period is two weeks after the first entry week. If those two weeks are up and a judge hasn't finished all the concepts, their scores are dropped. I try to get around 6-7 judges per month so when this inevitably happens I still have about 2-3 judges at the end. I've alternated between using average and highest score to see which fits better. Looking like highest cumulative so far.

After a bit of feedback I, this past month, also made sure to ask them not to enter their scores as they go but all at once.

RaptameiOct 31, 20141 votes

Sorry, didn't mean to imply anything. Simply that a conceptor hailing from the MCCC, from my observations, is on average much longer than someone who was 'brought up' on the CCC. That's awesome don't get me wrong, but as I beleive we both agree the Boards do not provide a good medium for posts of that length.

That's because the MCCC has devolved into a novel writing contest instead of a champion design contest. Just saying. :p

ElphrihaimOct 31, 20141 votes

That's because the MCCC has devolved into a novel writing contest instead of a champion design contest. Just saying. :p

This is blatant lies.

That is only the case for Othello / Fedora and The Core Augur.

And they're good at it, so why does it matter? :< I enjoy reading those short stories VERY MUCH myself, which is why I am so saddened by the fact that Core kept talking about how impossible Boards were...

Othello the CatOct 31, 20142 votes

...they're good at it...

D'aww...

ElphrihaimOct 31, 20141 votes

To each their own, no problem. Hopefully me quoting you is working out all right?

But of course. Reddit-style is counterintuitive to me is all I meant.

Sorry, didn't mean to imply anything. Simply that a conceptor hailing from the MCCC, from my observations, is on average much longer than someone who was 'brought up' on the CCC. That's awesome don't get me wrong, but as I beleive we both agree the Boards do not provide a good medium for posts of that length.

THAT'S true. I just didn't understand what you meant by "into several pages". x_x

Judging

Hmm. So you plan around judges not being able to fulfill the obligations they signed up for...That speaks good intelligence on your part and ill on the community's willingness to stay.

[Sorry. My brain gave out when I was trying to think over everything else...]

StephenizgodOct 31, 20141 votes

What i love about the CCC is how simple it is (idk if thats a good thing?) Its simple, just post a champion like normal and then put a comment with a link and boom your in (as long as you meet the requirements). As a judge in the last contest i noticed a whole lot of newcomers with great concepts, scoring along side the veterans.

If i had to state a problem with the CCC it would be lack of information? idk how to put it i guess, but basically I submit my champ then wait X amount of time until results. Of course i try to read other concepts and give feedback, but not everyone will so there is a huge amount of time where everyone is just waiting for the promised day. Maybe if there was a reason to keep contestants more active in the contest throughout the entire period?

Like every couple days post several of the concepts and ask for the community to give feedback then post another few concepts. I think something like that will not only create more feedback for the concepts but also get more attention towards the CCC. Not a perfect idea of course but something along those lines might help?

ZanryuOct 31, 20144 votes

basically I submit my champ then wait X amount of time until results

Tbh, this is no different as in any other contest. The problem in general is the mentality that everybody wants to win. This goes especially when there are prizes involved. Thus reducing the amount of feedback anybody will receive from other contestants.

so there is a huge amount of time where everyone is just waiting for the promised day.

I saw some argued that the MCCC requires more time because of tiered requirements, but to be honest, I ignored these mostly when I participated and finished everything in one go. And I assume I'm not alone on that.

Maybe if there was a reason to keep contestants more active in the contest throughout the entire period?

This is a general "problem" for every contest that requires time for judging. But I don't see any problem at all. In fact I wished that there would be MCCC and CCC in different parts of the month so everybody can submit 2 champions for different contest. The only thing we need to adjust is to syntonize the starting times. Let's say MCCC starts every 1st of the month and CCC on every 15th. Each contest lasts 1 month and so on. This way we can have 2 weeks for the MCCC champions and when they're finished we could start with the CCC champions.

Like every couple days post several of the concepts and ask for the community to give feedback then post another few concepts.

In my opinion there are at least three types of champion creators in this forum. 1) The adjuster Those are the types who generally cannot grasp their own concept very well and mostly change everything to please the comments. In most cases after multiple iterations these champions lose everything they were in the beginning.

2) The "stubborn" I couldn't find a better word but the meaning is the same. Those types are mostly resistance to any feedback and will only change certain aspects only by numbers, if any.

3) The wise This is more about reviewer but it applies to concepts as well. This type usually writes good, balanced concepts. However, most of the comments this type gets are only positive or doesn't add anything constructive. On the other hand, when they review, they usually find many things to address other reviewers wouldn't. This generally means that they either find many things to nag about which results that other people will also think that way. Or they provide so much information that the concept makes huges steps towards a better one.

As mentioned before the spirit of competetition restricts many contestants to write any usefull information for other contestants.

StephenizgodOct 31, 20141 votes

Hahaha that is a long comment, i think you missed mah point though. What i was saying was it would be nice if the CCC was more interactive to those who want to be more active in the contest. My point is for it NOT to be like every other contest and yes not every contestant is going to want to comment and give feedback, but from what ive seen ALOT do. The CCC suffers from the same problems that most contests have, like you said the nature of the contest makes it harder for people to give good constructive feedback and also the amount of "downtime" between entry and results. I was merely giving a suggestion on how to fix it.

I agree that those are a few types of creators, but there are more then just those and not everyone falls into one category. Sometimes they are proud of one concept and refuse to change it, i get like that. On the flip side they have the general idea but need help refining it and ask alot from the community, i do that too. There are those that refuse to change their own concept but still give great feedback and vice versa. Depends on the concept and the mood.

All im saying is if the CCC wants to get more attention then having huge periods of nothing happening is not going to do it. There needs to be more incentive for contestants to give feedback or something to do to pass the time and be constructive, specially during judging period.

ElphrihaimNov 1, 20141 votes

I saw some argued that the MCCC requires more time because of tiered requirements, but to be honest, I ignored these mostly when I participated and finished everything in one go. And I assume I'm not alone on that.

I think you may have thought what I said was this? I meant that because the MCCC has _more_ requirements it takes longer.

This is a general "problem" for every contest that requires time for judging. But I don't see any problem at all. In fact I wished that there would be MCCC and CCC in different parts of the month so everybody can submit 2 champions for different contest. The only thing we need to adjust is to syntonize the starting times. Let's say MCCC starts every 1st of the month and CCC on every 15th. Each contest lasts 1 month and so on. This way we can have 2 weeks for the MCCC champions and when they're finished we could start with the CCC champions.

The line quoted by Zanryuu: This is why some of the MCCC hosts had extra bonus challenges that would be pushed out partway through the month.

MCCC gives more time for it's challenges because there are more requirements. The CCC has a low barrier to entry, which means that any idea you thought up in the past can be adjusted to become an entry. MCCC submissions get crafted specifically for that contest.

[For the record: synchronize.]

As mentioned before the spirit of competetition restricts many contestants to write any usefull information for other contestants.

This, this, so much of this.

I frequently try my damnedest to avoid reading anybody's submission until I'm mostly done with mine. I take my time making my submissions, though, so by the time I get around to reading the submissions, there's not really much of a point in commenting on them... because I'm afraid of the judges making the exact same notes, and nothing is more stupidly aggravating than being told off twice for the same reason.

Sometimes they are proud of one concept and refuse to change it, i get like that. On the flip side they have the general idea but need help refining it and ask alot from the community, i do that too. There are those that refuse to change their own concept but still give great feedback and vice versa. Depends on the concept and the mood.

Well... sometimes, people don't know the background behind something. Somebody sets out to make a concept that has a specific set of goals in mind. Like, for example, "An active transformation that isn't your ultimate". But they don't say that anywhere. So naturally, somebody comes in, and points out imbalances that may be-- and suggests moving the transformation to the ultimate of the concept. The owner would never do that and has a very good reason why: Changing it to be such would destroy one of the goals of making it in the first place.

At least, with how I work, I'm never without a specific goal in mind when writing up a kit. I'm just bad at making it obvious that that was a point, a central feature.

All im saying is if the CCC wants to get more attention then having huge periods of nothing happening is not going to do it.

All contests work this way. There has to be some time during which no change can happen for the judges to fairly go over each champion.

There needs to be more incentive for contestants to give feedback or something to do to pass the time and be constructive, specially during judging period.

Attempted with the MACFA. You may notice it's not around on the Boards...

Not because it had that, but because the Boards are anathema to the way their system had been designed. But this system, I believe, did not actually assist it in living. Though I did not follow it particularly closely.

NagirteNov 3, 20141 votes

From someone who was involved in the macfa for most of its life the biggest reason for its death was just the sheer amount of work the judges had to do. Usually each judge had 6-8 concepts to judge in the first round and then another 4 to judge in the second round. And then you had to fight with the contestants who thought your comments were hnfair for 2 days and there was generally at least one each round for 2 or more of the judges. And even when I was judging and spent 3 hours on that one judgement and have an essay of your comments on what needed fixed you get angry replies saying you just didn't get it. There were a few monthly contestants who did this month after month and it was exhausting.

Many of the people involved in the running of contest also ended up leaving the forums or even League completely before the switchover even happened so the infrastructure fell apart. And it was getting harder or impossible to find people to do the art at the end. Granted that was not really the point, the point was refining your designs.

The feedback really did produce great concepts though and I think it also kind of reduced the every man for himself vibe that the mccc seems to have. It in no way was the reason for the contest dying.

Moby the WhiteNov 1, 20141 votes

I think one thing I've tried to do in the past was at least standardize a rubric. But different people have a different view of what is important. Some of the things being discussed now are great changes. What we need to make sure is that we are accepting to change. Judging needs a major overhaul, and I think with this we can improve it through this. I don't really like posting whether there is an award. That makes for a precedent that I never wanted. I started it I know...but it makes the competition fierce, and people seem to care ten times more when money is involved. If there is an award I won't announce it, because I can't guarantee that paying the winner will happen if it comes down to that or paying the bills.

Sir ArmaMalumNov 1, 20141 votes

Okay so brief update on things, mostly Boards related changes people for MCCC veterans:

November contest announcement will not be tonight under my advisement. Time of day plays a critical role in overall visibility, as bumping quickly loses weight in the Hot sorting. So for maximum exposure It's going to to be midday tommorrow.
This is probably well known by now, but entries will need to be a link to a post instead of a full submission within a comment. Due to character limits. Also, I have yet to try recently, but if you're running into a problem with the character limit in a post you can add more with a subsequent edit after posting. This worked a while back, but like I said I haven't tried recently so not 100% sure this is still available.
If anyone needs help on the Boards formatting (such as what you can and cannot do) I'll be happy to help you out.
This may just be me being an engineering student, but I've noticed some dissonance in the core 'goal' of the MCCC and CCC. In other words, I want to break both down even further.

The CCC, in my eyes, was more of a 'showcase'. A way for concepts to be grouped and shared within the concepting community. To bring like-minded people together through their interests, fleeting or no. (I mentioned earlier it as akin to a mosh-pit of ideas)

The MCCC (again, my personal interpretation) looks to be more challenge based. A test, if you will, to have designers tackle a given set of hurdles in creative ways to show off ingenuity and flexibility. This highlights more of a competition or contest than the CCC imho.

Both are great things, but I'm curious as to whether my interpretation of the two sits well with everyone. The best I can do is 'skim' the archives for past MCCC's, I was never there in the moment, so obviously my viewpoint of the MCCC is blurred at best. What do you all think?

ElphrihaimNov 1, 20141 votes

Time of Day

Well, to be honest, most of the people that care enough about a contest like this to participate in it fully... actually would look for it. So I don't think that matters.

Entry posts

excuse me while I make an off-site method to format my concepts because I bloody hate Boards. Not that I'm bad with formatting at all (I'd like to think I'm good with it), I just... refuse to use it when I can.

Difference between MCCC and CCC

I agree with your interpretation of the MCCC. But I was never here for the CCC, so I've got quite the foggy set of lenses ;)

The MCCC to me always felt like a way to restrict us, and then force us to add dimension to our character to make them very unique.

######That said, I have like fifty concepts that I should get around to posting, since the character limit will prevent me from actually posting everything I want to about them anyway... Like Elphrihaim, Elikia, Tayhine, Zelos, Kaikori, Enaeva, Enior, Zaichenrel, Nahel... I should probably do a few touchups on Nalwei so I can repost him here to the Boards, write up some lore for Kyogia, Lucia Reis, Alenda, Iava, and Marcul... I should probably also reformat Eliwan for the Boards, redo Cona with lore, Falchae, Celira, Phenix, Kaloth, do a Neku Sakuraba expy, make Urbiel's entropy mastery make sense, Isium Talinard, Kauto, Rimzel, Mellris, Eilia, the Skayle, do a Face-Rolling-All-Passives character for League, Zakul, Lukaz, a Cereberus... Okay, so it's not 50 that I actually want to redo, just 33.

ElphrihaimNov 1, 20141 votes

The above post, in chronological view is one of my favorites. There can be no substitute for the sheer awesome it has.

dialMARK4acti0nNov 1, 20141 votes

I think it's really cool that you two will be merging! And I'm also really proud for you Sir Arma ^^ What you do for the community is awesome, and to be humble enough to try and improve the CCC experience is really something to behold :D

What I want out of a CCC, honestly, is to showcase the talent of the community. Honestly, I think getting more attention all around would be great, because you'd be giving the community more exposure. I think that's what makes the CCC core to me. It's the fact that it's community-made and it shows what the community is capable of, when it comes to creativity.

Also, it's really cool to just chill out and do a concept that get feedback from other concepteers and than have your work and effort be recognized by others. I don't want any prizes or anything in a CCC (although I wouldn't complain if I ever got one xP), I just want to share things with the rest of the community and have things be shared to me BY the community

LilStacey87Dec 8, 20141 votes

When is the December CCC?

Sir ArmaMalumDec 8, 20141 votes

http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/skin-champion-concepts/dzUx2Ukw-lets-talk-about-the-mccc-part-2

Tl;dr Through a combination of workload on my personal end (finals and the like, #collegelife) and the fact that I want to change around the CCC's schedule and format a bit I'm making this an interim month. Between that linked post and the few I'm planning on dropping later in the month I'm hoping on making the CCC the contest the concept community wants and the one it needs :P