cigam - the affinity mage

2000boxes·3/17/2015, 3:34:41 AM·1 votes·390 views

cigam can focus his magical talent to certain nature affinities (basically he has different forms like udyr) passive- every time cigam changes his affinity he gets a 10 bonus ap for 5 seconds this passive can stack up to 5 times all affinity cooldowns are 7/6/5/4/3 all affinity mana costs are 45/50/55/60/65 q- affinity: fire cigam's auto attacks gain 50 range and deal 100/150/200/250/300 + (.25 ap) magic over 4 seconds every auto attack refreshes the affect w- affinity: earth cigam's auto attacks will deal .4 ap and stun for 1 second every 3 autos and he also gains 10/15/20/25/30 armor and magic resist e: affinity: water cigam's auto attacks will slow for 5/5/10/10/15% and deal .4 ap per hit r: Arcane Mastery when activated cigam will unleash a burst of magic damage dealing 200/250/300 + (.8ap) to all enemies within 500 units of cigam and his autos will deal an additional .3 ap

auto attack range: 500 base health: 400 health regen: 7 every 5 seconds health per level: 25 base attack speed: .6 base ap: 10 base ad: 60 base movement speed: 350 ad per level: 4 armor: 40 magic resist: 30 armor per level: 2 magic resist per level: 2 base mana: 300 mana per level: 20 mana regen: 6 every 5 seconds

3 Comments

2000boxes3/17/2015, 4:28:32 AM1 votes

why did i get downvoted? it's just a champion concept if you are going to downvote atleast explain why

Godhri3/17/2015, 4:56:13 AM1 votes

Since no one is doing you the favor, I will.

First, the structure of your concept is messy and unpleasant to look at. It's like looking at the first draft of an essay where the writer did not bother to structure anything at all. If you want to know how to properly write one, check out the popular concepts on the board here and try to simulate their structure and how they present their concepts. I mean really; they have to be popular for a reason and it can't simply be only the concept that got it there.

Second, your concept and the clear writing errors in them show that you didn't give this very much time, thought or effort.

Third, people like reading things that are pleasant to look at and well structured which goes hand in hand. Furthermore, people will be more likely to up vote your concept if it seems like you did your due diligence; that is, you read up on the current standard of champion concept writing and adjusted your concept accordingly.

Fourth, it is clear that you did not achieve any of the points I made in my third point.

Fifth, I have no further suggestions and this looks a lot like the Invoker from Dota 2 which would be plagiarism if you did not give credit where it is due.