What is a vote?
######I'm really tempted to make this into a full-blown SALT, but for sake of speed I'll save it for later.
Hi, I'm Sir ArmaMalum and one may call me a major supporter of CB. Well....I am. But that doesn't mean I don't also have problems with it as a whole. While I still prefer it over vBulletin there is one major thing I don't like about the CB's voting system, the question of why you're voting.
I'm just going to answer this question for you. Voting is a decision of "Do you want this post to see more eyes?" As that's the direct result of your vote. It's NOT an "I agree/disagree" decision. Through my recent experiences I have found some of you may not be old enough (unless of course you lied on my survey :P) to truly understand the difference between those options so I'll give an example:
A post titled "Diana is OP and here's why" versus "DIANA IS OP DELETE HER NOW". Both say the same essential thing, but I'll upvote the former and downvote the latter because the first gives an explanation and the second is just whining and accomplishes nothing. Personally I disagree with both, I don't believe Diana is OP but I'll upvote anyway because the first took thought and effort to explain their opinion.
There aren't many ways to incorporate this logic into the actual voting system. In other words there are not many easy ways to have the system itself 'teach' this train of thought and go against the "I agree/disagree" logic. Feel free to post here with an idea of how to. (Taking out the voting system is not an option, if it's used right by us, the community, it can be a powerful and useful tool)
Addition 1:
But Sir, what if their explanation is long and detailed but simply wrong?
Quite simple that one, don't vote yet. Explain to them why it is wrong and your opinion. The nice thing about the CB is you can hold a 1 on 1 conversation quite easily no matter where the post is without influencing the post's visibility. Who knows? Your conversation may make him/her eventually agree with you and you can upvote the post to highlight that comment conversation. I've had civil arguments with a summoner named Mackledoge coming around to 20 some decently long replies that covered a lot of ground. And even though the OP wasn't the best I believe it should get upvotes for the good discussion it created.
Addition 2:
So only long drawn out posts are going to get your upvotes? Wtf man?
No, just the ones where I can actually see thought went into its creation. You can make a good point in a few sentences, but more often than not a better and more expanded explanation helps out. There are plenty of exceptions, it's just a normally common trait.