Suspensions percentages.

Nowadays, more than 90% of bans come from chat.

According to what, exactly? Where are you getting your data from? It would make sense that a majority of punishments come from chat though, because 1, chat is significantly easier to catch than anything gameplay related, and 2, the number of players that flame is significantly higher than the number of players that troll. I'm confused why you want one group or the other to be the majority of punishments though. Just punish both of them, but find a better way to detect both.

This is not a "one is punished more than the other" thing.

This is a "one happens more than the other" thing.

Intentionally feeding, when detected and punished, is given an escalated 14-day suspension.

Riot and their systems aren't avoiding punishing intentional feeders just because they succeed at punishing people who abuse chat. This is not a zero-sum game where resources are being pulled away from punishing the inters.

You really need to read some of the posts on these boards.

Nowadays, more than 90% of bans come from chat. Would you rather 90 of bans be for inting or for flaming?

Flaming. Definitely. Why? Because more chat based offenses are committed. If 90% of bans were for inting, that would mean the system that detects flaming would suck, badly, regardless of how good the system was at detecting inting. Given how well it works currently, the only way that statistic could be achieved would be by actively downgrading the system. [Edit: Or of course, by banning a lot of people for inting that aren't actually inting]

Which shows exactly what the problem with exaggerated demands of this kind.

I mean it really depends on what people mean by "inters." Most of the time, it's just people having a rough time in the game and not performing so well, which is fine, it happens to everyone. People who flame though, yes, they should have some sort of punishment, however a mute would suffice better than a full on ban, what is the point of making people act better if they lose everything they paid for, and have no reason to improve once everything they had is gone. Now... I never gotten banned once, but from hearing people, flaming does deserve a punishment yes, but at least they aren't usually trying to force their team to lose the game or troll, if they were doing that, then yea they should be banned if it keeps going on and on.

Who you would rather get banned?

No preference there, for me. Its both.

The feedbuster wont magically improve if Riot bans less people for flaming. So this whole question is really quite pointless.