why is a "bad game" not grounds for a slap on the wrist if it the person does it regularly?

xelaker·12/1/2016, 7:12:59 AM·2 votes·498 views

currently for someone to get any punishment for intentional feeding they have to have some crazy 0/40/0 game where they say, "I am intentionally feeding" every 2 minutes builds 6 tears, and takes as top (take note of the exaggeration there...) and little Timmy who routinely goes something like 0/9/3 in 8 of out 10 games is just "having a bag game, man". the other 4 people still loose lp or have to waste time on an unlikely won game in both scenarios. I'm not talking account bans or anything crazy, just a light slap on the wrist that says, "hey maybe run a intermediate bot match and figure out what's wrong"

2 Comments

Pantheon Forever12/1/2016, 7:24:29 AM1 votes

Some people are just bad at video games, they want a large audience to support the free to play model. grandpa or little Timmy are advertised too get $ from skins even if they never get good enough for a serious player. If you are truly better than the bad players you will climb faster than them and see fewer over time as your rank increases. Being bad a t a video game shouldn't be ban worthy only keep them at a low rank. In order for the integridy of rank to be preserved everyone regardless of skill should get a chance to compete. The logic is if you and another player who is worse than you both play 10 games together and 10 games apart you will win more than they do when apart and you climb to a point where a slightly better bad player becomes your new goal. For just a second imagine how faker, doublelift, or bjergson must feel.

Bloodmorne12/1/2016, 7:28:50 AM1 votes

because people baby them . so they continue to do it. passive aggressive generation