Opinion: Do players think 'Just a bad game' needs revision?
First off, not a toxic rant. I couldn't give a rats ass if people suck and we lose because they died a lot. They won't win their next few, I will, I will see less of them. I get the theory.
I also get that people do have bad games. Albeit rarely, a first blood that goes badly can lead to you never catching up and getting snowballed on, you end up 0-6. There has to be a protection for players on these bad games.
However, there is a point that their deaths per minute reach a point that they can no longer cling to 'just a bad game'.
The PB&M forums are really 'unskilled friendly' when it comes to players and punishments, so where do you guys draw the line?