Don't DO =/= Don't SAY

The Ecdysiast·10/10/2017, 3:19:31 AM·1 votes·337 views

You probably agree that the worst detriments to the community are those players who do one or all of the following:

  • Rage Quit (leave because they are doing poorly or don't like the match-up)
  • Intentionally Feed (hand kills to the enemy because they're doing poorly or don't like the match-up but don't want to get automatically leaver-busted)
  • Cheat (use scripts or other third party software in order to give themselves an unfair advantage)

These are the worst offenses because, try as you might, there is nothing you can do to fix the situation when someone does these things. And because there is nothing players can do when another player does any of those three things, it is-- and should be-- left up to Riot to ban said players from playing the game.

However, there's another reason players get banned for which no punishment should be enacted by Riot: casual gaming speech. What inexperienced gamers may refer to as "toxicity." Whether a player is being toxic is completely subjective, and made even more so by the lack of a voice chat in this game. Knowing this, Riot implemented one simple function that completely removes the subjectively perceived toxicity without any effect on gameplay whatsoever-- the mute button. It takes a grand total of 1.5 seconds to hold TAB and press the little speaker icon next to someone's name, or the little "!" icon if you feel they're incorrectly using pings.

Yet still, Riot will ban players for using their chat function in a way that another person disagrees with, even if said player was the biggest contributor to the team's victory. This isn't right or fair to either party. The one who speaks should not be punished simply because someone else disagrees with them, and the one who disagrees should not be rewarded for refusing to use the mute function.

For now though, Riot takes the stance that the feelings of those most prone to having their feelings hurt are justice. Maybe eventually they'll realize that a competitive, team-based game such as this will always create negative feelings when allies mess up and switch their stance. Or just outright remove the chat function, like they did for the public chatrooms years ago.

It must feel really nice, knowing you can basically steal and burn upwards of hundreds of dollars worth of content from another player just because they said something you don't like. Think about how you'd feel if someone hacked into your account and changed the password next time you're a little upset that someone pointed out the fact you're building Sunfire Cape against Rumble.

18 Comments

ModThe Djinn10/10/2017, 3:25:09 AM7 votes

{quoted}...casual gaming speech. What inexperienced gamers may refer to as "toxicity."

I've been gaming seriously for nearly twenty years. That doesn't mean I'm happy with (or have to put up with) people using hate speech against me, insulting/abusing me during my leisure time, or telling me to harm myself. It's far from a matter of "experience."

Whether a player is being toxic is completely subjective, and made even more so by the lack of a voice chat in this game.

Not really. Toxicity is insulting/harassing/hate speech/abusing someone without the buy-in of every team member.

The one who speaks should not be punished simply because someone else disagrees with them, and the one who disagrees should not be rewarded for refusing to use the mute function.

You're misunderstanding the reason for the mute button. It is included as a shield against toxicity with the understanding that Riot's community will never be PERFECT, and thus innocent players should have a way to avoid abuse. It is NOT included to ENABLE toxicity by making the default be harassing, abusive behavior with the only escape being the mute button. The fact that it technically can do either is immaterial to the intended goal.

If you do not want to be a part of the community Riot is trying to build, there are many other games out there where you can abuse other players to your heart's desire. That inclination of yours, however, does not mean that Riot is somehow wrong in deciding to go another direction -- merely that their direction may not suit your personal tastes or habits.

Jo0o10/10/2017, 3:44:19 AM5 votes

"Gaming speech", as you put it, doesn't have the rep for negative comments due to that being a requirement for competitive video games. It has that reputation because immature and cowardly individuals feel empowered to say hateful shit from behind a keyboard that they wouldn't dare say in the real world.

Your teammate built a sunfire cape vs. a Rumble? Sorry to hear that. Maybe try pointing out their error to them in a constructed manner, rather than making it your mission to make them suffer for their transgression. Effective communication in League doesn't require flaming, and I utterly reject your insinuation that it's somehow helpful. I sincerely hope you don't think that hammering somebody with slurs somehow makes them better teammates.

Chermorg10/10/2017, 3:22:47 AM1 votes

[deleted]

Nik Nikerson10/10/2017, 6:57:13 AM1 votes

I much prefer a rage-quitter to someone that's just going to fight with everyone on the team and act like a dick. I may lose with a rage quitter, but I'm probably going to lose with the other person as well, and at least the rage quitter gets the game over with more quickly and quietly.