@Riot, a proposal on punishment?

Remnar·6/30/2016, 2:50:27 PM·1 votes·367 views

I don't care how many charts or graphs you shows us about player behavior, and how it's only a "select few" in the community who are routinely toxic.. you need to lay down the law, for the sanity of the rest of the community. Stop being an enabler and letting people do toxic things, saying you can "reform" them.. and here, I'm in the giving mood, I'll lay down some ideas to help you get better at actually punishing people. Implement the "4 strikes law." First off, clear everyone's sheet and start anew and all punishments go by on a yearly basis, meaning you only get 3 strikes against your record in a given year.

Of course, we should all hold Riot accountable for reviewing reports and making sure they are accurate, and report abusers should suffer harsh penalties themselves. A "ban review" option should be available as well for each strike a player gets, so they can try to make the case for their own defense if they feel they are being wrongly punished.

..........................................................

  1. Strike One: Player behavior was bad, but since they do not show a history of toxic behavior, they receive a written warning from Riot, spelling out why they were reported and why they are being warned.

  2. Strike Two: Player receives 7 day chat ban for behavior and another warning about potential punishment if player does not reform.

  3. Strike Three: Player receives 7 day game ban, and another warning note, stressing this is their final strike for the year and any further issues will be ban-able on a 6 month basis or, if necessary and depending on what behavior is happening, permanently.

  4. Strike Four: In extreme cases, and under intense review, players can be banned permanently. Any violation of the terms of use would indeed fall under this category as well.

..............................................................

Now, this is, in my opinion, the best way to go about punishment for a community, that frankly can be pretty damn toxic at times. Why?

Because, it gives people enough of a buffer that, if they are just having a "bad day" and are toxic for one game but otherwise are good members of the community, they don't get punished too harshly, but if they repeat behavior, then the mercy of the system runs out, and harsh punishment follows.

The reason why i think this is better than the current system: The fear of punishment is so low that, players will openly flaunt toxic behavior, believing that Riot is in essence, weak, on player punishment. You can see it in chat or on these forums plenty of times, or by asking the general community.

.............................................................

Of course, there will be those who say I am too sensitive, or thin skinned and need to deal with it. Perhaps, but that's not really what we are talking about, we're talking about the principal of respect in gaming, and following the rules of the Summoners Code as established by Riot. Common courtesy and respect is something we should all want, and get behind and those who work against that by saying I'm too sensitive are those who do not want to have respect or courtesy in their games.

So, in conclusion, I call on Riot to implement a stricter system for punishment. Make clear that toxic behavior is not tolerated, and that severe punishment can follow quickly if the player does not reform. ...............................................................

I welcome comments and will of course be open to any suggestions that anyone may want to make. Thank you for reading, and have a great day.

13 Comments

AramsAreBest6/30/2016, 4:19:04 PM1 votes

Dontt forget to use the mute button.

scazzman6/30/2016, 4:33:36 PM1 votes

in my opinion. it isnt that riot isnt punishing toxic players. it's that theyre specifically targeting verbal toxicity as opposed to gameplay toxicity

Randomonium6/30/2016, 6:15:30 PM1 votes

Riot already does this.....

They literally have a 4 strike system already in place. First two strikes are chat restrictions, third strike is a 14 day ban and the fourth strike is a permanent ban. A player must go 3 months without getting punished to go down one punishment tier.

Players receive a warning in game and an email each time they are punished. Players can appeal their punishment by submitting a support ticket. If players are punished for chat they are provided the chat logs from games where they were reported.

I don't see how your system is different from the one in place already.

iisabrina6/30/2016, 6:35:39 PM1 votes

You pretty much repeated the 4 strike system that Riot has and made it more moderate (Which I am totally fine with) because every few months I get a 10 game chat restriction filled with chats where I said "yo bitch stop feeding" and even more moderate chats..

  1. The warning is better than a 10 game chat restriction in a toxic persons eyes because any reasonable toxic person wont play a serious/ranked game if they are restricted
  2. 7 day chat ban on chat could be a little more harsh than 25 games depending on the addiction, but honestly having to play 25 games is more tedious and if I was banned for this I would rather wait 7 days than play 25 games restricted
  3. 7 day ban easier than 14 day ban
  4. Perma is still perma.