The Concept Behind IFS
EDIT: I’m not here to argue a suspension but the system. If you would like to argue over the suspension then I will not respond any further.
After a long discussion with Skeletor last night about the system, I have decided to post on the community thread because this really bugs me - especially since I work in health care and public policy. The instant feedback system is flawed and does not take into account cultural means or aspects. Now I am on the fairly older side of the age group that still plays league of legends and believe it or not the first time I heard of the zero-tolerance policy and IFS was literally 2 days ago. Having played since season 1 on and off, I can't really blame them as I don't update my client and bother to read ToS with my schedule.
This brings us to the issue of a holistic review when coming to banning individuals. Now in my scenario, the use of the term "kys" warrants an automatic suspension of 15 days. What I do support is the idea behind helping individuals avoid bullying. However, this also does not take into the account of different cultural and societal implications of different meanings. Believe it or not, I had a whole entirely different meaning for kys because I had no clue and asked a friend what it meant. Three years later here I am - dumbfounded. The lack of approach to actually understanding the perspective and use of someones intentions are proper here. Can someone even say that to their friend - get reported later on and banned without having it intended for another individual? Yes. The game cannot account for in game behavior and external circumstances such as voice chat.
Don't get me wrong, I could hardly care less if I get suspended as I have alternate accounts I can play on if I have the time. It would however, be nice for a re-evaluation of scenarios like this.
I would love to see a better approach to this. If words warrant a ban - then they should all be filtered. To my knowledge KYS was not a filtered word and it is fairly difficult to judge what would be appropriate from Riot's standpoint as everyone has a very different culture. Upon further analysis and questioning of my peers who also play league have stated they use this to tell friends to shut up. Failure to observe someone else's culture is fairly inappropriate. For example, where I grew up the word bet means "Bet you won't do it" or "Bet I won't do it" as opposed to the concept of gambling.
To all of you the system may seem fair, but I would hate to see a kid or someone be a victim of the system. Especially when common terms for them are used to speak to their friends and are misinterpreted by the system. Looking at chat logs help, but also timing and responses from the whole chat log can play a big role. Also did the player intentionally make his/her team lose the game? These are all things to consider in scenarios such as these. I know for a fact that League of Legends is a huge portion of someone's life and by having a simple misunderstanding can lead to fatal consequences that were originally planned to avoid.
Anyways, food for thought. Before I do let the down votes pursue, I am on the older side of the age group and work heavily in mental health. I don't have time to keep up with the changing acronyms and am a heavy advocate of suicide prevention. My life is dedicated to helping depression and suicide. Kudos to Riot for taking a step, however it would be nice to at least have KYS a filtered word and a more holistic approach to banning people instead of relying on an automated system.
P.S. Thanks for the conversation Skeletor yesterday. You made me want to post this during my break.