🔒 "But he called me toxic first!" An essay on behavior featuring a unique solution

QuiverMeTimbers·5/24/2017, 6:34:30 PM·0 votes·1,728 views

In light of ethics it becomes painfully obvious that Riot has some serious work to do if they want to retain players. You would be surprised how many people quit for their own reasons. The problem resides in players quitting due to Riots actions. It takes an adult to admit wrongdoing. Quite frankly Riot is a child, scratch that. Riot is like a children's choir singing together for the very first time.

So i aced the intro, but more about me. I am a gaming critic, tester, and all around talkative person. lets get straight into it. When you create any environment that has an ethics code there will always be some descent, i mean new players walk right into that wall every time they join LoL. Even if you disagree with everything I am saying right now, remember the first time you encountered the word "toxic". The first time i ran into this LABEL i certainly did not deserve the title. Simply by outlining sportsmanship as criteria for being toxic, Riot has implicated every current player take a moral high ground. This has completely disrupted many real discussions and thus stunted the evolution of this game. I have been playing LoL for a very long time now, yet i play 1 game a day if at all these days. IMO the top reason for players giving the game up are firstly the player community, secondly the moderator community, thirdly and finally abusive behavior.

Firstly the player community is a joke. There are tons of kids playing who feature a lack of respect. Yet some of the older players are even worse, crying out about toxicity at the very first hint of dissent. I mean what is this game now Riot? Lets count the countries where dissent is a punishable offense... This game is very literally a dictatorship in many players eyes. First example; you decide to bring up a very real issue in the community while you are in game (one time i said), "why do i always get the bad team?" The answer (directly from my fellow man), "You are being toxic." I do not have to explain what is wrong with this because everyone will draw their own conclusions. However in that game i intended to get a very simple point across. I was on a losing streak and i felt it was simply less enjoyable (not unfair). How is this toxicity? At that moment it dawned on me how much of the discussion dies to the spear of toxicity, so to speak.

Secondly the moderator community, based on the first reason for dissent that i have listed it is quite clear that there is disagreement about what is toxic in the mod community (singed bot lane roam case). This can only mean one thing in matters pertaining to persona non grata. There is a power struggle and the status quo is struggling, what exactly is toxic? It would appear that the word toxic applies to far too many things at this moment. I am talking science Riot. It is clear to many players that the word toxic is half enigma and half truth, at this juncture toxicity is false. IMO this game is so old in fact that the "toxicity" may be the exact feedback that was to grow this game into something better. Something more valuable to the human condition. Instead of rising to the occasion and trying to meet player needs i feel moderators may have done more harm than good redefining toxicity on a case to case basis. The real question is how many players did not even speak about the matter. How many people left without a real word regarding what does and does not exist in the game, what they want in the game, what made them leave, and i could go on and on. This is where the record breaks and i ask for players in ranked to speak up because i do not play ranked and never will. To the ranked players, Why did you think about quitting? Do you think moderators need to have more check and balances? What is a short, or long (clear, concise) definition for toxicity?

Thirdly lets talk abusive behavior. Where does it begin and where does it end? It began for me very realistically on my first LoL account several years ago, a random stranger said the f word in chat (not that f word, the other less allowable homophobic f word) and i was taken aback. I had not said anything out of the ordinary to the person. The fact is i got mad about it like we all do. But then i had wonder what kind of damn horrors this player was exposed to before he decided to simply blurt the f word at all other players in chat. At that moment i knew it was certainly not the non-toxic game it proposed to be. Over the string of three years of gameplay i ran into so much garbage that i felt i like i was tied to a chair in a wind tunnel with a garbage truck (not the small garbage truck but those giant semi truck sized ones) dumping trash in my face. Try not to imagine that. Result, i play like one game a day (unless the client bugs out, again). Personally i think LoL is in need of a drastic combat ranking overhaul, see < that is how "abusive" i have become XD

Enough about leavers, forget those guys (for real next game sorry). Lets revert the discussion to sportsmanship and toxicity (skip to the end of the essay for my solution). There are way to many problems to count when you want to talk real ethics among this forum community. IMO toxicity is far too broad a label, i think toxicity should be removed as a label and there should be tenants in place of the broad term toxicity. Not even summoners code goes into detail enough. Seriously how long has this game been out and everyone is still talking about what not to do. I think the discussion needs to be guided towards actual positive guidelines.

Take my statement for example. I once said "why do i get the bad team", ironically one the players called me toxic. Is it not perfectly clear that labeling people is rude and power greedy. Lets face it the person could have been positive and its likely in turn that would yield more positive thoughts for me. Instead now we have this power struggle wherein i am accused of being this broad (moronic) term. If being critical of a game that is constantly updating and improving is toxic, what is not toxic?

I feel i was not toxic in any way as i said "why do i always get the bad team" in passing. I have instead spotted a serious case of poor player behavior en masse. If educating players to report a people as toxic is productive lets me know please as i continue to laugh at people who walk up to me and write toxic on a label and subsequently stick it to my forehead... Makes total sense to me, because i am the person with the plan. I am the one actually speaking up about player behavior and player quality. Of course all the toxic players can now simply hide behind the giant spear of toxicity provided by Riot and try to flay me alive. Not sure if any other gamers out there know who Fox McCloud is, but he has a certain ability that happens to be quite comically equivocal to my very predicament.

(solution) Hereby i denounce players who consistently accuse others of toxicity as complete frauds, i propose a simple and easy change to leaver buster system wherein player actions result in direct upvotes and downvotes to an averaged player scorecard. It could be so simple as to vote players down everytime they send consecutive chat messages (we all know the spammers and flamers). Equally the system could issue a downvote whenever the player stands still. i.e. stopping and flaming is now VERY punishable. waiting in the store is now VERY punishable. Flaming and spamming are TOTALLY punished (people i mean those who send two to three messages in a row)

Lets talk theoretical values. like sending a message while moving is -1 point (there will be justice for that one time you stopped to send a message and missed lane by one second). stopping is -1 point a second (while not attacking). stopping and chatting is -2 points a second. keep in mind that was just a very very rough draft. and the real thing would be a whole lot more calculated and calibrated to ensure you at least get a player that participates. or if you are of lower caliber you get stuck with more and more toxic players.

Think about the realtime consequences of this system. We all know the toxic players will make an attempt to downvote this post, after all they are crawling all over these forums(destroying the game and tenants). If we had passive ranking in a smart playerscore card like this we would be faced with people more of our own character. I am not saying this is a perfect solution but at least the best players would shine through: The player who is always moving and issues only quick pings because they are so focused on gameplay. The player who never chats because it takes up too much time. The player who is so clockwork that they buy and move every time they get to the shop. need i say more? You decide because i gave up on your game a long time and could honestly care less at this point, save your community with my simple idea or be my guest. Go deal with the bronze community without my system. Go binge ARAM (my personal favorite) and deal with the trolls. Because guess what i firmly believe that a larger portion of the community is more toxic than ever and i refuse to play.

50 Comments

Umbral Regent5/24/2017, 9:33:44 PM9 votes

So, since you're considering this an essay, I may as well grade it as though it were one. First, let's talk grammar, spelling, and overall readability:

  1. A vast majority of your post consists of unbroken paragraphs, making all the content you wrote up extremely hard to digest.
  2. You had a number of misspellings, homonyms, and typos, which, just to list a small few: "descent" (in Paragraph 2, when you likely meant "dissent"), "implicated" (also Paragraph 2, not sure what you meant here, but I assume you mean "insisted"), "tenant(s)" (Paragraphs 6 and 11, you likely meant to say "tenets", as in a principle), and so on.
  3. More a crime than not breaking up your paragraphs, you misused full-stops/periods a number of times, creating sentences that shouldn't be there. Consider using colons and semicolons ( : and ; respectively) or hyphens ( - [the minus-key]) to separate your sentences.
  4. You also had several solitary lower-case I's - personal pronouns need to be capitalized.

Though, that's only a rough look at readability, GUM (Grammar, Usage, & Mechanics) and spelling; were I to go over the entirety of it, I would be wasting time that could be used moving forward.

Though, that brings me to the next part: How does this "essay" serve as an essay? While it does serve the textbook definition of an essay (an article on a given subject), this post in particular is meant to be an essay whose goal is to convince readers about a certain viewpoint or proposition. Let's judge on that front, shall we?

  1. First and foremost, the best indicator for a bad or poorly written essay is the first paragraph, or the hook; yours, as it is, is less than amazing. If you want to persuade people into seeing from your viewpoint, calling them (or in a neutral case, Riot in specific) children or "a children's choir" will only further separate people's viewpoints from your own. In short: calling people children makes you yourself look childish.
  2. Second, be humble. You lose even more credibility with your poor hook by saying "I aced the intro" - you aced nothing, and only made yourself look worse.
  3. You mentioned a "reason for dissent" in the fourth paragraph, but I don't see one in the second paragraph. Is your "reason for dissent" the fact that there are rules? If so, you lost points for having no reliable reason for dissent (as there will always be someone who wants to break rules) - and if not, you lost points for having no reason for dissent in the first place, and then off-handedly mentioning it.
  4. Using similes like your wind-tunnel/garbage truck imagery in Paragraph 5 and then warning against imagining it both defeats the purpose of the simile entirely, and also does nothing to share your viewpoint.
  5. Also in Paragraph 5, you broke any semblance of seriousness by using the emoticon "XD" - if you want to write an essay, take the subject seriously.
  6. If you want to use people leaving the game as a point of reference, you need to do two things: Talk to them, and also cite them. Talking to them allows you to better understand their viewpoints as to why they left, rather than just claiming they left because of poor moderation on the part of Riot and their Moderators.

You will also need to talk to them so you can get their permission to have them cited as reference for your essay. Claiming people's viewpoints without actually having links or citations of their viewpoints (such as searchable quotes) makes you much, much less credible, which again defeats the purpose of the essay to get your viewpoint across to other people.

Moving on, we come to the last thing to look at in terms of criticism: Your proposal - or in your words, your "solution".

  1. If part of your solution is to simply denounce anyone who uses the term "toxic", then part of your solution will effectively accomplish nothing.
  2. If your solution involves currently-existing systems, it would probably serve you well to actually understand what the system does. Leaver-Buster penalizes players who disconnect from games in-progress, hence the name "Leaver-Buster". It's not a system that monitors every single action in a game, it monitors player connection status throughout.
  3. Whenever you come up with an idea, please, for your own sake if not everyone else's, think it through. Your proposed player scorecard system is completely inane, requiring that players - even in Normals - be exclusively playing the game from the moment they spawn in, and nothing else. This would effectively ruin the chat systems and also penalize players for actually making in-game decisions, such as waiting out the last few seconds of radiant gold before they can purchase a B.F. Sword. You criticize Riot for being a "dictatorship", and yet your idea is equally as bad as you portray Riot to be.

Ultimately, your essay is poorly-written, fails in its intent, and the proposal you make as your "solution" is nothing more than an elitist's half-baked fantasy that is completely infeasible in any state, rough draft or fully-developed.

Your grade is 0/100, and you've earned an F.

Kei1435/24/2017, 7:52:58 PM8 votes

So... Essentially prisoner's island but from a gameplay perspective?

That's not going to solve toxicity, it's just moving the toxicity pieces around and making it super hard for people to improve their game play and behavior.

ModAttysu The Poro5/25/2017, 3:29:44 AM4 votes

Hereby i denounce players who consistently accuse others of toxicity as complete frauds, i propose a simple and easy change to leaver buster system wherein player actions result in direct upvotes and downvotes to an averaged player scorecard. It could be so simple as to vote players down everytime they send consecutive chat messages (we all know the spammers and flamers). Equally the system could issue a downvote whenever the player stands still. i.e. stopping and flaming is now VERY punishable. waiting in the store is now VERY punishable. Flaming and spamming are TOTALLY punished (people i mean those who send two to three messages in a row)

Lets talk theoretical values. like sending a message while moving is -1 point (there will be justice for that one time you stopped to send a message and missed lane by one second). stopping is -1 point a second (while not attacking). stopping and chatting is -2 points a second. keep in mind that was just a very very rough draft. and the real thing would be a whole lot more calculated and calibrated to ensure you at least get a player that participates. or if you are of lower caliber you get stuck with more and more toxic players.

I don't know if you realize, but this would basically make it so anyone who wants to talk at all can't. It punishes players who do nothing wrong other than typing a message. What if they type something like "Lets rotate mid" and miss a minion, would that count as a -2 a second? That took me 3 seconds to type so -6 points immediately.

Sending a message while autorunning to lane in the beginning of the match -1, stopping moving is -1 (which is crazy, considering people can pause in a game for like a second, what if they're in a bush or waiting or something.) Waiting for that extra 15 gold for BF Sword in fountain is now punishable, etc.

You're punishing almost everyone, not just toxic people at this point, which is why Riot would never implement such a system.

Tract5/26/2017, 5:56:33 PM2 votes

In light of ethics it becomes painfully obvious that Riot has some serious work to do if they want to retain players. You would be surprised how many people quit for their own reasons.

I actually am quite surprised, as I would love evidence of this.

Quite frankly Riot is a child, scratch that. Riot is like a children&#039;s choir singing together for the very first time.

Why bother with scratch that when you can just backspace ._.

So i aced the intro

Objection!

but more about me. I am a gaming critic, tester, and all around talkative person.

Is this what you mean by critic? And PBE tester? I am confuse.

Even if you disagree with everything I am saying right now, remember the first time you encountered the word &quot;toxic&quot;. The first time i ran into this LABEL i certainly did not deserve the title.

First time I ran into the word toxic was when Twitch was free, or was it Singed? I forget, sorry! Also because you are so vague, I am going to infer from this posts existance, and the forum it is in, that you have been banned for toxicity and are complaining? You are way too vague but that's the assumption I'm going with, feel free to correct me.

This has completely disrupted many real discussions

Where?

and thus stunted the evolution of this game.

When?

IMO the top reason for players giving the game up are firstly the player community, secondly the moderator community, thirdly and finally abusive behavior.

Ahh the evidence. Based off my previous inference, the people giving the game up are firstly those banned, because secondly the moderators banned them for toxicity and third, it was all because of that players toxic behavior.

Firstly the player community is a joke.

Thanks :C

Lets count the countries where dissent is a punishable offense...

Let's count the dictionaries in which flaming someone is the entry defining the word "dissent".

This game is very literally a dictatorship in many players eyes.

Again, where?

First example; you decide to bring up a very real issue in the community while you are in game (one time i said), &quot;why do i always get the bad team?&

Let me get this straight. You are calling the community toxic for not being appreciative of toxic behavior? You are out right admitting that you consider an issue very real in the community to be "bad teams"? Ok.

The answer (directly from my fellow man), &quot;You are being toxic.&quot; I do not have to explain what is wrong with this because everyone will draw their own conclusions.

I would love an explanation, as for myself, based upon what I hve read so far, have drawn a diametrically opposed conclusion....

However in that game i intended to get a very simple point across. I was on a losing streak and i felt it was simply less enjoyable (not unfair). How is this toxicity?

Ok now I see what you mean. You had an inclination to insult your teammates because...you intended to call them bad? Legally, intent is defined as the conscious object to, aside other things, take a substantial step towards commission. You intended to flame them. Just because you were not enjoying yourself, you intentionally made the game less fun for others.

what exactly is toxic? It would appear that the word toxic applies to far too many things at this moment.

Toxic, in this context, is defined as insulting teammates or acting in a manner which intentionally or consequentially damages the experience for others. I.e., flaming them.

I am talking science Riot. It is clear to many players that the word toxic is half enigma and half truth, at this juncture toxicity is false.

Where are the many players? How on earth is it an enigma? What juncture? I genuinely don't know what you mean. Toxicity is easily defined, its not rocket science.

Instead of rising to the occasion and trying to meet player needs i feel moderators may have done more harm than good redefining toxicity on a case to case basis.

Again, would you prefer an automated system which is far FAR more likely to mess up than a human? Case by case is far more effective at preventing conclusions based on exingent circumstances, or maniplulation of the system by a bunch of dickheads to get some random guy banned

To the ranked players, Why did you think about quitting?

Nope, although I play kinda on and off depending on if I have time.

Do you think moderators need to have more check and balances?

No.

What is a short, or long (clear, concise) definition for toxicity?

I think I've paraphrased this more than once now. Toxicity is intentionally flaming, insulting, trolling, etc; with the intent, circumstantially clear intent, or recklessly resulting through obvious language; to cause the unhappiness of other players.

But then i had wonder what kind of damn horrors this player was exposed to before he decided to simply blurt the f word at all other players in chat. At that moment i knew it was certainly not the non-toxic game it proposed to be.

Dude...the player probably was exposed to the horror of facechecking some Shaco box filled bush. A swear word is not inherently toxic, especially when not directed at others. And are you kidding me....that's when? And when was it proposed to be specifically non-toxic...

Enough about leavers, forget those guys (for real next game sorry).

Ok I'm 100% with you here, leavers suck, we all hate them.

IMO toxicity is far too broad a label, i think toxicity should be removed as a label and there should be tenants in place of the broad term toxicity. Not even summoners code goes into detail enough.

You don't need that detailed of a standard. Will saying it make you a dick? Don't say it! Would you want someone saying to you? Don't say it! Could it offend someone? Don't say it...if you are unsure of your judgement, just don't say it.

Take my statement for example. I once said &quot;why do i get the bad team&quot;, ironically one the players called me toxic.

That players actions are not ironic, that you believe it is wrong of them is the irony here.

I feel i was not toxic in any way as i said &quot;why do i always get the bad team&quot; in passing. I have instead spotted a serious case of poor player behavior en masse.

If you don't see that as even a little toxic then it's clear why you were issued a punishment. Also, there is not chance that's all you said to get banned. Please post your full logs if you wish an accurate judgement.

Not sure if any other gamers out there know who Fox McCloud is, but he has a certain ability that happens to be quite comically equivocal to my very predicament.

Do a barrel roll! Sorry you kinda waked into that one :P

Hereby i denounce players who consistently accuse others of toxicity as complete frauds, i propose a simple and easy change to leaver buster system wherein player actions result in direct upvotes and downvotes to an averaged player scorecard.

Leaver buster only, and I mean ONLY coveres leaving and disconnecting, not toxicity, what's the point in voting? People won't bother wasting time to do it anyway. There's already a similar system, honoring someone or reporting them....

i.e. stopping and flaming is now VERY punishable. waiting in the store is now VERY punishable. Flaming and spamming are TOTALLY punished (people i mean those who send two to three messages in a row)

The amount of messages is entirely irrelevant. For example,(I am NOT accusing you of this is ENTIRELY a made up example) calling someone a racial/homophobic slur and then telling them to kill themselves can be done in a single sentence.

Lets talk theoretical values. like sending a message while moving is -1 point (there will be justice for that one time you stopped to send a message and missed lane by one second). stopping is -1 point a second (while not attacking). stopping and chatting is -2 points a second. keep in mind that was just a very very rough draft.

I am sorry I am completely confused. This is so excessive, I think I can see what you are implying but I'm still confused. If someone is good, toss me an honor. If their a toxic prick, report them. Otherwise, nothing.

and the real thing would be a whole lot more calculated and calibrated to ensure you at least get a player that participates. or if you are of lower caliber you get stuck with more and more toxic players.

This is actually a real theory, sometimes called criminals island. In other words, just take all the bad people and throw them into their own ecosystem with all the other bad people, so they can all be bad to each other and stay isolated from others.

You decide because i gave up on your game a long time and could honestly care less at this point, save your community with my simple idea or be my guest.

The current system, while imperfect, is perfectly fine....

Go deal with the bronze community without my system. Go binge ARAM (my personal favorite) and deal with the trolls. Because guess what i firmly believe that a larger portion of the community is more toxic than ever and i refuse to play.

I have been going off the assumption that you were punished, and are unable to play, not simply unwilling, if I am wrong, let me know asap. Also, for the record, I didn't downvote, or upvote. Also if you write up your system i reccomend sending it as feedback/suggestion, because we players cannot do a single thing to implement anything. Also I've gotten gold ._. not bronze.

Hope you have a better day then yesterday(or whenever since Idk if you will ever even read/notice). I hope you realize the error in thinking this way about the community(although some can be pompous pricks), if you ever want to add me and chat or play feel free ^_^ I promise I won't flame you, and maybe point out what most people perceive to be toxicity.

QuiverMeTimbers5/26/2017, 6:18:29 PM1 votes

{quoted}

yes, precisely. why the hell would i put detail into a rough copy of a behavior system? i knew the forums whould rip this apart and see it the wrong way anyway.

obviously you missed the part where i suggest that every player be faced with an average overall player score. here is funniest thing about my super long original post. the only people the post is targeting is those who literally stand and chat for much more time than others. its a simple penalty system! what about an AVERAGE NORMAL MIDDLEGROUND score did you miss. its just a simple method to truly penalize toxic players. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS? the summoners code is now a lie. the LoL community is clearly fake. toxicity is now not punishable once the fine line is understood. WHY IS AUTOMATIC MODERATION SUCH A HARD THING TO GRASP? because you must all be terrified of facing your arrogant self in the player "hell" i want created.

with this i leave this post, i do not have words for this community any longer. unless the next message i get is from a riot employee who wants the entire discourse. as it would have appeared before i got TROLLED BY TOXIC PLAYER. i refuse to speak on this subject. good day. enjoy having the right to stand and talk shit in chat when i pummel your face with my tank :P

Aptest5/26/2017, 6:24:27 PM1 votes

So i aced the intro

No mate. You flung some shit. You didn't show anything you said had merit.

So far, this is how I see you, based on your post:

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-comedy/monkey.jpg

Aaaaaaanyway...

honestly I CBA to go through the rest of your post. I see a lot of bad arguments one after the other with the principle culprit being your tendency to present your idea of what causes what as a proven concept again and again and always without any supporting argument or merit.

Tract said everything I wanted to say with acceptable facsimile (one or two caveats). Can you, instead of reading my post, go read his a second time?

As for toxicity: as with every technical term, there is always a bunch of people who don't understand it and use it wrong. Toxicity is a very specific and well understood concept - don't let their existence make it appear to you that the situation is different.

DarkLooN5/24/2017, 6:45:41 PM1 votes

This game, nor the rules will ever change because 1: Riot thinks their current rules are always right, absolute. 2: They enforce TAKING abuse, not combating it or even defending yourself, or you suffer the same punishment as the abuser (No other game i have ever played does this....) 3: Refer to 1 and 2.

Thus, LoL.

Deep Terror Nami5/26/2017, 7:48:28 PM1 votes

I'm locking this thread now, as it's been not much more than flaming and nonconstructive posts. If anyone would like to continue a discussion here in a constructive and respectful manner they can create a new thread.

If you have questions or concerns about this action please visit us in the PB&M channel of the Moderation Discord here.

-DTN

https://i.gyazo.com/865d2bc6092141bd4137c073f7bc4ba2.gif

KORGtuners5/24/2017, 7:55:30 PM1 votes

An* unique solution. Poor grammar nerds. Extra salt because you used an correctly in the same sentence.

QuiverMeTimbers5/25/2017, 3:04:04 AM1 votes

Ya i am just going for blog style at this point. I did thinking on my rough draft, it would be quite challenging do develop a changing player average score. In regards to

{quoted}

So... Essentially prisoner's island but from a gameplay perspective?

That's not going to solve toxicity, it's just moving the toxicity pieces around and making it super hard for people to improve their game play and behavior.

no its not going to be like Alcatraz or anything. More like an equation. there would be a simple and solid state of normality. The LoL meta would not change my only intention is to put trolls in the correct place while having a holistic friendly setting for players with a "normal" or "average" scorecard. Essentially what we are saying here is that people who breach the summoners code aggressively would be penalized. In emulation of the current system my system would only feature temporary punishment.

My system would penalize toxic player before the almighty temp ban is issued.

Look i have to try and appeal here, have you ever been in a game and asked yourself why you have to play with the one guy that is boosted and stops to flame chat every 5 seconds? I am trying to imply that that person should be in a league of their own. Meanwhile the majority of players are in the league of normies (you, me, and everyone else that likes to stop for that split second to say something important). If you think about this strategy you might see the evil genius behind it. If we could recognize a bots exact behavior we could put them in their own league even!

You must see reason, why the hell would i want to play with somebody that does not pace in the shop, somebody who stops to chat for too long while the enemy takes a turret. Think about the course of a month of play. What if the scorecard reset every month? I bet one week into a rotation the same slightly more positive meta would emerge from the same player base. You do not understand there should be no purgatory here i do not want to play with people who cannot auto move, chat, and fight. It is that simple for me. I know player behavior by now, sometimes i just see dazed people in lane not moving or participating. how is even acceptable in accord with the summoners code? Please up vote this post for me everyone who reads this, i want more discussion into this.[slayer-pantheon-popcorn]

YerroFever5/25/2017, 7:10:27 PM1 votes

I'm going to leave the first and last sentences of the sections I'm referencing and just put "..." between them because the paragraphs are long.

{quoted} (edited out intro)

Firstly the player community is a joke.**...**At that moment it dawned on me how much of the discussion dies to the spear of toxicity, so to speak.

Dissent is not punished. I do not understand how you equate "lack of respect" to dissent. A player's lack of respect for another player is not dissent. Dissent is an opinion that isn't common or the majority.

Dissent is actually fine to have as long as it is well reasoned and thought out.

Secondly the moderator community, based on the first reason for dissent that i have listed it is quite clear that there is disagreement about what is toxic in the mod community (singed bot lane roam case). .... What is a short, or long (clear, concise) definition for toxicity? (edited for convenience)

If you're referencing the singed support case (and also indirectly referencing the nunu counter jungle/support case which also referenced back to the singed support case), the community spoke out very strongly against banning someone because they go off meta. The reds came back and said that the person was not punished for playing off meta but not communicating their intent and making sure the team was comfortable with the different tactic and fully communicated what the ADC should be doing and making sure if the ADC was OK with it.

Toxicity is only an enigma to those who don't follow the red posts and just presume what the definition is and then get corrected by the reds or the community because there are people who have actually followed the posts to get a better sense of what Riot considers toxic.

Thirdly lets talk abusive behavior. ... Personally i think LoL is in need of a drastic combat ranking overhaul, see &lt; that is how &quot;abusive&quot; i have become XD

I don't know what you mean by combat ranking. Are you talking about elo/mmr? People have had problems with matchmaking for a while and the end result is that this is the most efficient way of getting matchmaking done. Your elo is similar to your team's average elo and the enemy team's average elo is similar to your team's average elo.

Enough about leavers, forget those guys (for real next game sorry). ... If being critical of a game that is constantly updating and improving is toxic, what is not toxic?

What Riot tends to say is toxic behavior is behavior that negatively affects the community as a whole and creates a bad gaming environment. The specific examples are far too many but they have been discussed quite a bit and some things have changed, like recently, ping spamming. That's a new example of behavior that has been added to the list of behaviors that are toxic. This isn't because it wasn't toxic before, but always was toxic but people had not used it on such a massive scale that it became such a problem that it had to be addressed on a large scale.

The list is ever growing because people find new ways of negatively affecting the community and to create a bad gaming environment.

What isn't toxic is human decency. Recognizing the person on the other side of the screen is a person and is imperfect and deserves to be treated with respect.

If you don't know how to be decent and respectful to another person, then I think the problem isn't with the definition Riot sets out as toxic behavior, but your definition of what human decency and respect are.

I feel i was not toxic in any way as i said &quot;why do i always get the bad team&quot; in passing. ... Not sure if any other gamers out there know who Fox McCloud is, but he has a certain ability that happens to be quite comically equivocal to my very predicament.

What Riot likes to see is players self regulating. By that I mean not only players regulating their behavior but also players who see other people's negative behavior and try to stop it.

If someone is raging about losing their lane and saying they don't know how to win their lane anymore, Riot likes to see players step up and give constructive suggestions. "Have you tried to give up a few CS to let the wave push and just farm under your tower and wait until mid game for team fights?"

If someone is calling their teammate the N word or the F word, Riot likes to see someone step up and say, "hey, don't call someone that"

You're so focused on reporting and asking Riot to fix the problems for you instead of leading by example. If you want a good community, you have to be the kind of person you want to see in games. It's been happening in league, you just have to be patient and wait it through.

I've played league for many years and I didn't play ranked for the first few because I kept hearing the toxicity was so much more intense in ranked.

(solution) Hereby i denounce players who consistently accuse others of toxicity as complete frauds, i propose a simple and easy change to leaver buster system wherein player actions result in direct upvotes and downvotes to an averaged player scorecard. ... Because guess what i firmly believe that a larger portion of the community is more toxic than ever and i refuse to play.

There is too much room for abuse in your system.