Skip to content

i think the "inting sion" strategy causes more harm than it does good

Jennifer420··26 votes·14,447 views

as someone who loves to splitpush (because i suck at 5v5) this strat is literally what i always wanted. you are tanky, you waste the enemys time, you destroy their base.

but: the person who did this "first" is a diamond player. diamond players tend to do drake or bot towers when they see 3-4 enemys in top. low elo players tend to spam pings more than they do damage to minions.

inting is still hard to detect: im sure in 99% of int bans it comes down to a manual review. and so far it happened twice to me that i saw a sion walk into tower range, die and dance in his passive and not even try to damage the tower and then says "check reddit guys im doing the 'inting sion' strat" so yeah it is a legit excuse that will only get banned if manual reviews happen. and they are rare to come by.

and last: this player tries to not die until he has his item 3748 done. if you just push the first wave and then go like "idc if i die, i attack tower" then you cause more harm once again. not only will you fall behind way too fast, you also will take forever to get to that itempoint where you are unkillable AND have the godlike push power.

i have to be honest. i dont want to be riot in this situation. it reminds me of the "ascension - pacifist strat" where players didnt kill a single enemy and kept them hostage until they surrenderd. at first riot punished these players. then i read posts saying they got unbanned and now riot allows recalling in ascension so this strat doesnt work anymore (btw it still does. you can still use item 3751 burn to cancel a recall and pretty much every champ has enough lifereg to not die from it)

but in my opinion, this strategy should be banned. sadly. as i used it myself and it was super fun and i won 4 out of 4 games where i tried it.

also i have to question the balance team here. you have a champion who goes like 1,5 dmg items first (titanic + steraks counts as 0.5 as it gives also tankyness) who goes like 0/10 and you need 3+ players to kill him because he is too tanky and destroys your paper i mean your tower. maybe you should rethink how tanks work in general? idk. going 0/10 and being able to keep 3 or more players busy? sounds a bit broken.

40 Comments

Kei14327 votes

Inting sion is similar to proxy singed strategy. It requires everyone to know what to do from a macro perspective.

If you are going to run in circles to waste enemey's time, you better dam be making sure your team is actually on the map and in position to take objectives, NOT recalling or coming out from base. If they are in base, the sion should play it safe and not run into the enemy's unknown territory.

That actually is the basics of split pushing, and applies to any split pushing strategy, including inting Sion and proxy support smite singed.

Jennifer4202 votes

but proxy singed usually results in him getting executed. and in the enemy actually losing farm if they come for you

Kei1431 votes

Yea, that's part of the results of proxy singed's strat.

Inting sion would have a different result on the strat (result is more turret dmg), but the macro side of "pressure other things while they are hunting Sion down" is still the same as proxy singed.

mosdeadly2 votes

too bad shutdown gold is bullshit right now. Inting sion works because if hes 0/20 then he fed about 2k gold. Meanwhile if you get three kills youre worth 600 gold. So at 9+ deaths you will be worth 50 gold 3 deaths is 150 gold and the enemy feeds 600. This is why this strategy is bullshit. You could literally destroy this strategy by just making the game not garbage. Make towers stronger and make shutdowns less opressive.

AugustHeatHaze1 votes

did they recently increase the amount of shutdown gold you get? it feels like its even more of a swing now...

mosdeadly1 votes

no thats how they reworked it players just started to abuse it recently.

AugustHeatHaze1 votes

oh so mabe its just placebo cause i doubt people are good enough to abuse it in my games

when was the rework?

mosdeadly1 votes

patch 8.8 was the rework.

woodvsmurph7 votes

You forgot to mention the build and strat only really works most effectively vs tank toplaners. Bruisers will contain you for much of the game and you'll have to play hide-n-seek to dodge them later and push tower or they can probably kill you and the minion wave mostly negating your strat. And fighters? They'll do what bruisers do only better later in the game.

People use literally everything as an excuse. The majority of people just watch a vid or google crap and run it because they think it's good. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't; regardless, they tend to have no clue WHY it works and so they fail with it miserably or play it very sub-par. Because we defend these people and admonish any form of negative feedback - even if done so respectfully - (like bot, you can't win 2v2 right now, please just farm by your tower for now) these players never learn. It's one thing to make a mistake here and there - we all do. It is another when you see someone making the same mistake 3,4,5...10+ times in ONE match. Like does someone have to tell them every damn time they cross the street to look both ways? I'd like to think not. So neither should they need someone to point out it's a bad idea if they fail the same thing 3x or more. Learn... because it's no longer a mistake - you know better. But we excuse these people and punish anyone who dare point out that they need to stop no matter how nicely they explain/ask. And this only serves further to hide people who are hard inting like you mention above and excuse it because we've created a community where pointing out anything bad someone has done (even politely in the interest of helping them improve for next time) is considered toxic. As much as people claim nobody understands what inting is... nobody understands what toxic is.

I'm amazed how many players can have things explained to them very clearly and logically - backed up by facts and examples - and appear to have 0 understanding of what was just said to them. And how freaking blind people are. The perfect example I run into way too often? I'll warn my team several times with pings, type in chat, and go to clear a giant side wave so they know not to get too close and get caught out 4v5 or engage a potential 4v5 fight. As soon as I get wave cleared and building up to slow push to enemy tower? I'll look to group. Only... my teammates ignored everything I said and pinged, forced a 4v5, and died before I could even finish tp - even when I start it before touching the wave cuz I saw they went in anyways. Team all dies, team blames me, team loses game. Utter stupidity. But it gets better. Adc or support runs off without warning as we are about to fight because we NEED to force to defend a game-ending baron or elder? Team (me included cuz I'm prioritizing objective and TEAM over selfish farm) engages 4v5 or gets engaged on, team gets wiped, someone from the 4 man is an "idiot" who cost the game - not the adc or support who ran off to afk farm when we HAVE to teamfight in 3 sec or basically hand the enemy the game for free. Now there's logic lol.

I swear the intelligence level of the typical gold elo player is now where it used to be in bronze... when I started 4+ years ago. There's far too many players who are hella boosted... probably across the board (all elo's). People need to stop excusing this crap as "bad game". If my micro skills and champ mechanics are far below par, my macro is abyssmal for my elo, I refuse to work with team or adjust from making the same bad play(s) over and over again all match long... I'm clearly not just having a bad game. Bad kda does not equal inting, but underperforming by a landslide in every measurable aspect of the game while refusing or proving incapable of adjusting my poor play would prove that I'm highly boosted. These people should be punished. And monitored. If they keep doing it even if it's just a few games here and there... but consistently, they should be insta-demoted a tier or two to the elo that matches their play. I know people are gonna downvote this because they'll think I'm saying a bad game here or there is going to drop them from silver to bronze or something. But that's not what I'm saying at all. I've had teammates start 1/7/0 in laning phase, but they listened to their teammates, worked with them, and ADJUSTED/IMPROVED their play throughout the game. They made an obvious effort to work with their team, make SMARTER plays, and TRY to win. You do that? You aren't repeating the same "mistake" over and over, you aren't intentionally sandbagging or playing boosted all game long. So you shouldn't face any punishment for that. If you were to go 1/7/0 in lane, keep making the same bad plays, refuse to listen to teammates, never adjust your play, have terrible mechanics for your elo... that's a different story.

So in summary: there are massive problems with boosted players (or intentionally sandbagging players) ruining games for other people, inting sion strat can be an excuse to hide this - which is furthered in it's effectiveness due to the overprotective culture we've created, and sion strat is most effective vs tank toplaners.

Råkån ßøt6 votes

Even riot doesn't want to be riot in this situation, nor in any situation since as you said "manual reviews are hard to come by". They leave their work to robots because they're too lazy to do anything themselves.

Samflash31 votes

[{quoted}](name=Råkån ßøt,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=tzMdZKHP,comment-id=0005,timestamp=2018-10-15T19:33:12.884+0000)

Even riot doesn't want to be riot in this situation, nor in any situation since as you said "manual reviews are hard to come by". They leave their work to robots because they're too lazy to do anything themselves.

Do you expect Riot to spectate every single game?

Vreivai5 votes

{quoted}

im sure in 99% of int bans it comes down to a manual review. and so far it happened twice to me that i saw a sion walk into tower range, die and dance in his passive and not even try to damage the tower and then says "check reddit guys im doing the 'inting sion' strat"

There was a thread a week or so ago on here where a guy just inted in the middle of the lane as Sion, claimed he was doing the Inting Sion strat, got a couple of red posts and got his ban reversed. So even in the case you described, it seems as long as someone claims they're doing the Inting Sion strat, they can intentionally feed however they want with impunity.

Resolution1 votes

{quoted}

There was a thread a week or so ago on here where a guy just inted in the middle of the lane as Sion, claimed he was doing the Inting Sion strat, got a couple of red posts and got his ban reversed. So even in the case you described, it seems as long as someone claims they're doing the Inting Sion strat, they can do intentionally feed however they want with impunity.

Yep, can go 0-30 as Sion, but as long as your getting towers - its ok apparently.

Vreivai3 votes

You don't even need to get towers. The one I'm referring to he'd just go back top after dying, where Irelia already was, run straight down the lane, then get killed by her in about 2 seconds before he got anywhere near a tower.

Spank the Fox3 votes

This is what happens when a community complains about Riot being too ban happy and “hates off meta”

Now they’re going to err on the side of caution.

3TWarrior1 votes

not really. the off meta thing is perfectly legit and riot needs to expand on their rules to say that the strategy you use can not force your allies to play in a manner you deem acceptable (such as forcing a 1 v 2 situation bot, which although it can be handled, is annoying as all get out and not even viable this season)

compared to games where if you watch the player running in mid or another lane or just sitting in base or something

3TWarrior1 votes

0/30 is technically 2775 gold as they never reset their bounty

Vreivai1 votes

It's also a fuckload of xp, and you're not counting any assist gold.

SaltyToplaneGoat4 votes

It's a cheese startegy that barely works against a team that knows of it. I had to deal with it, so I sat together with the jungler and the roaming mid and we set out a rule of priority: first of all we kill Sion, then we take an objective. Bot was tasked with stalling until we got him down - and that was quite fast, even with Soraka top and Shaco jungle. If that level of coordination between five strangers is possible in Platinum 1 (where I play), then I doubt this will be a very long lived strategy.

SonicAF3 votes

Being effective should never be about kills.

Vreivai3 votes

From some of what I've seen, the strategy needs a different name. Not that idiotic "strategically minded Sion" that Riot posited, because it doesn't describe the strategy at all. Maybe "single-minded split pushing Sion."

My point is that calling it Inting Sion gives many people the false impression that intentionally feeding is how the strategy is accomplished, rather than deaths that look like intentional feeding being the byproduct of employing this strategy. And as a result you get people that just go and intentionally feed in the middle of the lane during the laning phase because they think they're doing Inting Sion.

Dasdi963 votes

{quoted}

From some of what I've seen, the strategy needs a different name. Not that idiotic "strategically minded Sion" that Riot posited, because it doesn't describe the strategy at all. Maybe "single-minded split pushing Sion."

My point is that calling it Inting Sion gives many people the false impression that intentionally feeding is how the strategy is accomplished, rather than deaths that look like intentional feeding being the byproduct of employing this strategy. And as a result you get people that just go and intentionally feed in the middle of the lane during the laning phase because they think they're doing Inting Sion.

You are right, this "strategy" is anything but "strategically minded" because it just involves mindlessly ramming into towers and trying to kill them. Furthermore, you get players that think they can do this "strategy" on any champion. For example, someone can claim that "inting lux" is a better strategy and just end up being of negative use.

3TWarrior1 votes

pretty sure that someone who can not understand how Sion's passive works would be of negative use anyway

zilean, aatrox and several others could do this strategy as well if they figured out a build path

3TWarrior2 votes

how about Raging Sion or Crash Sion , Smashing Sion, Unstoppable Sion, Crazy Sion, Construction Worker Sion, Tower-buster Sion

lots of names

Aseraan1 votes

How about Feeder Sion?

3TWarrior1 votes

the concept is not that bad, especially if there are minions against an opponent without much wave clear

TrulyBland1 votes

How has nobody come up with "Tunnel Vi-Sion" yet?

MegaLobunny2 votes

I heard that Riot plans to buff towers defenses (though honestly I don’t think that shield is enough and scaling might be needed as well). I haven’t heard anything about Sion and I’ve heard people of all ranks comment on how ridiculously Tammy he gets.

Korijenkins1 votes

{quoted}

I heard that Riot plans to buff towers defenses (though honestly I don’t think that shield is enough and scaling might be needed as well). I haven’t heard anything about Sion and I’ve heard people of all ranks comment on how ridiculously Tammy he gets.

I don't think tower buffs are whats needed to repair the meta. Adding new items every patch and buffing items has created a mad power creep that was never addressed.

3TWarrior1 votes

wasn't even the items, it was the runes and masteries stuff that got it started while they decreased tower health, defenses, etc while increasing passive gold generation

previously it took excellent CS'ing and maybe a kill to have a full item by 6. it's normal and even has more to offer now

Resolution2 votes

Riot's already stated that this strategy is allowed. Apparently, as long as a player intends to win, they can play anything.

I'm so playing Nami Jungle and ill just roam healing people instead of ganking. Permission was granted :).

3TWarrior1 votes

if you could gain XP somehow, a roaming nami "could" work but you'd be counterjungled very easily

not very effective compared to some of the other supports that could roam though

bard is a better choice as it's part of his design and he can do the same things XD

Aseraan1 votes

I can only agree whit you on this sadly whit this logic anythign is allowed as long as you yourself claiming you do it to win. cuz what else you want whit going 0 20 0?????

xxxDogmanxxx1 votes

Int Sion works only if the rest of the team aren't complete idiots. I tried it in Normals, and my team literally just kept dying 4v3 while 2 people killed me. Then they have the nerve to flame me when I literally was the only one who took all three towers that my team had.

ZerglingOne1 votes

Which is why, imo.

Sion soft rework.

Passive: soul furnace. Gains HP for killing shit.

Q: Same

W: Same, but obviously the passive component is gone.

E: same.

R: same, but after the charge the ASPD and life steal of his current passive for a few seconds.

His passive has always been the dumbest part of the rework.

OHminus1 votes

I welcome any new strat for mah boi Sion

Tank, AP, lethality, crit, support, bruiser and now int

What's next? 5000 MS Sion? (Riot make this happen)

ZaFishbone1 votes

I think the Roit support team should be doing their damn jobs and manually reviewing reports of inting to ban ppl who really do it. I thing the LoL playerbase should be doing their jobs and report inters instead of raging in all chat and not reporting anyone afterwards. I think it is wrong to discourage a clever strat just because ppl are using it as an excuse to int for real. Adding some counterplay is ok, but not trying to shut down a strategy because of trolls. And funny how the best way to add counterplay to this strat would be to do what the playerbase has been asking for years: BUFF TOWERS!!!

WAZZZUP5001 votes

Pretty sure sion is a juggarnaut, so is garen, illaoi, yorick, darius, nasus, and mundo. They are all supposed to do damage and be tanky; they're designed to be a big threat that draws attention. I will admit, they are overtuned, but they work the way they are intended to. Actual tanks are champs like nautilus, maokai, amumu, and leona. Honestly, they are completely fine balance-wise, but they suffer from the amount of true damage that is in the game atm.

Danksley1 votes

Preseason will fix it since cs and towers create shutdown

Faneseeker1 votes

You also need a team of players that has a reasonable league experience to know what's up when this occurs. Even that is true they have to be in the position to capitalize it. So yeah it works, but it will take many loss games to get a win..suicidal sion basically has an extra 5 sec to hit the turret after he dies, any pusher can accomplish the same without dying. Ask a Garen.

More from Player Behavior

More by Jennifer420