Skip to content

Permenent bans arent the solutions to toxicty,they are the problem! (my opinion :) )

sheep1X··4 votes·730 views

I really do think that, reformed players, who play the game on their not banned account without flaming, or not even showing a tad bit of toxicty, do not deserve a PERM BAN, not saying that the punishment isnt well deserved, it sometimes is, but in some cases (and let me tell you, most of them), people reform, and change their ways... im putting this thought out there because, perm bans arent really a good solution, especially when they are able to create a new account and fully reform (me inclded), seeing their old account rot, knowing they cant go back to it, just puts salt on their wounds (even if tehy acomplish more in their new account).

so let me raise this; THERE ARE ALTERNETIVES. for example, why arent seasonal bans are a thing? a season is a well long enough time to reform (for players for players who TRULEY want to, again, me included), seasonal bans can range from 1 to a couple of seasons, not nesseccerally condeming the account to not be played again.

share your thoughts on this thread! even if you do not support it, share your thought, and even leave a solution, that might be good enough to replace the perm ban.

the community will surely appreciate reformed players, since they are more careful with their behaviour, and are certainly nicer than most averege players (again, REFORMED players). they surely do better in terms of behaviour than most people i see playing, day to day, who cant control their temper and are still out there, ruining games to people, now, im not here to say that reformed players werent toxic, some of them were active ones, some passive aggresive, and some just had a vurst of flaming that got them banned, but reformed players get their title for a reason, they are REFORMED, keep in mind that some of them (me included) will do anything within their reach to get their beloved accounts back, even if it means giving up on some things back in their old account, even though most of them get a higher rank thanks to behaviour improvement, some just miss their account, that is full of skins, and glorious, level 7's on all of their most loved champs, and even replays they had on their old account.

i know this topic is very controversial matter, so please dont comment aggresive/obvious things that will make fun of either sides.

dont be afraid though, express your thoughts to the fullest, just with a bit of subtelty.

hf discussing ideas and thoughs :) [slayer-pantheon-popcorn] i would really appreciate if you take the time to even leave you opinio on the matter.

48 Comments

ModThe Djinn11 votes

the community will surely appreciate reformed players

We do, on their new accounts.

The thing is that Riot has tried account-reforming experiments before. They found that the vast percentage of players who are permanently banned did not reform, even when given the opportunity to earn back their accounts. This is why we don't have an official "prove reform and reverse the punishment" process.

If you want to avoid losing your content, there are still many reform opportunities available -- one after every punishment prior to the permanent ban. THAT is the time to prove your dedication to reforming, and the loss of that account is the punishment for not doing so and continuing to ruin games. I don't think we need to give anything back to players who caused that much of an issue to their fellow players.

More time-bans simply means people can start account rotating. Additionally, Riot has experimented with more bans / different length bans, and shown that increasing the number of chances given or the length of temporary bans doesn't actually correlate to an increase in reform. Again, they have data on this, which is why that system isn't implemented.

Pandemic Punch2 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=r806AEwy,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2018-03-22T16:03:46.485+0000)

We do, on their new accounts.

The thing is that Riot has tried account-reforming experiments before. They found that the vast percentage of players who are permanently banned did not reform, even when given the opportunity to earn back their accounts. This is why we don't have an official "prove reform and reverse the punishment" process.

If you want to avoid losing your content, there are still many reform opportunities available -- one after every punishment prior to the permanent ban. THAT is the time to prove your dedication to reforming, and the loss of that account is the punishment for not doing so and continuing to ruin games. I don't think we need to give anything back to players who caused that much of an issue to their fellow players.

More time-bans simply means people can start account rotating. Additionally, Riot has experimented with more bans / different length bans, and shown that increasing the number of chances given or the length of temporary bans doesn't actually correlate to an increase in reform. Again, they have data on this, which is why that system isn't implemented.

It's a shame that this is how you categorize players who get banned for one response to players who repeatedly commit the same offense in the same match and DONT get put on the same category.

It's a shame when that same player with one response only did so in 1 game on a 6-7 year old account with no history of committing that offense. It's a shame when the other player and players like him will continue to commit hate speech offenses And trolling gameplay with no ban.

I believe Riot needs to be lenient until they can tell the difference between a toxic player and a player who takes up for themselves or others in a single match.

ModThe Djinn2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Pandemic Punch,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=r806AEwy,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-03-22T17:18:36.012+0000)I believe Riot needs to be lenient until they can tell the difference between a toxic player and a player who takes up for themselves or others in a single match.

This is precisely why there are multiple levels of warnings for all but the very worst behavior, and the chance to reform your own account through good behavior.

sheep1X1 votes

Yes, heard more than enough about the lvl 20 challange, i do not see a clear reason that reformed players wont get their accounts back, its not like when they will get back to flaming instantly because theres a curse on that specific account. they are called reformed for a reason. and i do not see a clear reason to not try seasonal bans, even place along perm bans. im my opinon, if perm ban will HAVE TO be kept a punishment, it should be the "ultimate punishment", so to say, not something you get after a 14 day ban, now i know its up for debate, but lets be real here; season long bans can be given out, and will do the same work, or even better (letting players know they have to reform over that period of time, which is a season, or two, depending on the level of toxicity), it will not only drive them to reform, it will reward them for reforming and becoming a good, loving and friendly member of the league community, perm bans, from personal experience, do half of that, they make you care less about being flame, and make you completley (in my case) a non flamer, and a passive player (applies to most of the permed players ive came across), BUT it keeps gives you that chill when you see flaming, toxicty, and the word report, last game i played i had a 14 day banned guy and i litterally coached him to control himself just so he wont get banned, just like i and many others did.

these are just my thoughts on it, in short ofc, but you should consider the efficincy of letting someone get a new account and be that guy whose reformed because he had no reason, or doing the same thing (with a long period of time mind you, seasons dont go by like weeks) with encouragement to reform, thats what im trying to spark in reforming the reforming of a player (not pawn intended :) ), that feel of actually wanting to reform, and the feeling of actually doing, makes you feel so good about yourself, that you know you werent forced to do it (by getting a new account and doing it all over again). its an acomplishment most people will use in life, me for example, knowing im reformed (and actually really cool, and not short- tempered) helps me think about situations with a certain POV that helps me keep cool and positive, when i go through them, knowing itll be for the best at the end (or atleast that what im thinking XD).

so what im saying essencially is that reformed players learned their lesson pretty well from their ban, and will, wether itll be from a perm ban or a seasonal/ two seasonal ban.

anyways thanks for replaying djinn, its an honor to get your answer and opinon for my disscussion!

[galio-happy]

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}so what im saying essencially is that reformed players learned their lesson pretty well from their ban, and will, wether itll be from a perm ban or a seasonal/ two seasonal ban.

That sort of goes against the data though -- again, Riot opted for the permanent ban because the found that more/longer bans didn't show increases in reform, and they opted to remove options to regain accounts because they found that that didn't result in enough people reforming either.

Believe me -- I'm with you that these seem like easy/good solutions. But Riot has tried them, and that's why I can't say I'm in favor of them -- they don't do enough to address the issues that similar experiments have had in the past.

anyways thanks for replaying djinn, its an honor to get your answer and opinon for my disscussion!

My pleasure!

[slayer-jinx-catface]

Mordius2 votes

Riot's previous experiment everyone references was to get to level 20 without any infractions. The problem I have with that, is getting to level 20 is fairly easy, and fairly quick if you use exp boosts, So I don't feel those people could have really reformed or even taken it serious to reform, because it was simply too easy.

I initiated a challenge at the start of the season for permabanned players to reach level 100 and honor 5, without any infractions by the end of the season. This to me is far more challenging, and time consuming. Only genuine players interested in reform would actually be able to complete this challenge.

You can get more info here

sheep1X1 votes

{quoted}

Riot's previous experiment everyone references was to get to level 20 without any infractions. The problem I have with that, is getting to level 20 is fairly easy, and fairly quick if you use exp boosts, So I don't feel those people could have really reformed or even taken it serious to reform, because it was simply too easy.

I initiated a challenge at the start of the season for permabanned players to reach level 100 and honor 5, without any infractions by the end of the season. This to me is far more challenging, and time consuming. Only genuine players interested in reform would actually be able to complete this challenge.

You can get more info here

I would really like to to test me, only problem is that my new account is in euw now, and its level 10 :/ whatdyaa say you try me? i would gladly accept the challange, ill even try helping you with getting the chat logs and such, so that you will be able to truley see that im going through the challange without cheating :).

i know this currentley has no reward (my old account) but i still would very much like to try it, so please, reach out to me with the details, and ill take on it.

you can send all the details to my discord, which is: sheepIX #8983.

[slayer-jinx-catface]

Awf Meta1 votes

Seasonal suspensions is a new idea to me. At first glance, I kind of like it. It is long enough to be a severe punishment.

I still like the idea of regaining accounts after showing reform. Riot will say they tried it with their level 20 challenge. They will say not a lot of people reformed. I don't care. Those people that DID reform, earned their accounts back. It's not about how many people earned their accounts back. It's about that any people earned their accounts back.

ModThe Djinn4 votes

{quoted}It's not about how many people earned their accounts back. It's about that any people earned their accounts back.

The problem is that the downside of pivoting from their official "if you are permanently banned, we'd prefer you not continue to play League" to "you're welcome to play League over and over until you can show us a reformed account" is that it becomes an invitation to the larger percentage of players that, statistically, will not show reform and will continue to ruin games in their attempts to regain the account.

Riot would, frankly, prefer to discourage that.

Awf Meta1 votes

Are accounts not free?

Riot is doing jack shit to prevent people from rejoining after a permanent ban.

ModThe Djinn2 votes

{quoted}Riot is doing jack shit to prevent people from rejoining after a permanent ban.

I never said they had processes in places to block it. Merely that they want to discourage it, and giving people a chance to earn back content by playing the game is actually an encouragement to keep playing.

Awf Meta1 votes

An encouragement to play the game WITHOUT breaking the rules.

Continuing to break the rules will not get content back. Thus, not actually different than what we have now with people freely making new accounts.

ModThe Djinn3 votes

{quoted}An encouragement to play the game WITHOUT breaking the rules.

Again, their statistics have shown that even with this encouragement most returning players continue to break the rules. The different between the current system and this suggested addition is that the suggested addition encourages continued play with the possible promise of a reward at the end, which might encourage toxic players to keep trying.

The current model doesn't encourage them to try again. That's really the main difference. If the statistics showed that all toxic players play on new accounts anyway or that most toxic players would reform if given their account back at the end of it, I'd agree with you 100%. From what we've heard from Riot both of those things are, statistically, untrue. Until we see accurate evidence that these situations have changed (and no, "I think this is the case" or "it's obvious from the boards/Reddit" don't really count as accurate evidence), I can't support such a policy shift.

Awf Meta1 votes

Again, their statistics have shown that even with this encouragement most returning players continue to break the rules.

And again, I don't give a fuck. Let me put it to you this way: 1 reformed player getting their account back is worth 10000 toxic players attempting and failing to get their accounts back.

The current model doesn't encourage them to try again. That's really the main difference.

It doesn't prevent them from trying again. Creating a new account is not discouraged in any way. No prevention, no discouragement, no encouragement.

Adding an encouragement to play the game WITHOUT breaking the rules is not a negative no matter how you try to spin it.

ModThe Djinn4 votes

{quoted}And again, I don't give a fuck. Let me put it to you this way: 1 reformed player getting their account back is worth 10000 toxic players attempting and failing to get their accounts back.

Which is a fine opinion, but one that is definitely subjective, and one that Riot, at least, seems to firmly disagree with. C'est la vie.

Awf Meta1 votes

And the rest of my response?

Ready to admit Riot is vindictive?

LordofStone1 votes

{quoted}

And the rest of my response?

Ready to admit Riot is vindictive?

It is not really that they are vindictive, their code is lol ;) Go back up and read my post, it most likely is not a game you want to play all the time anymore.

Awf Meta1 votes

I'm about to rant sorry.

I've always been one that values game play over graphics. Todays video game industry does not agree with me.

I also have come to value money differently as I got older. I can not justify spending $60+ on a game I don't even know if I like. I'd rather buy food and water for a month. Which ends up pissing me off when I think about it. Take the billions of dollars these video games make and we could easily supply the entire world population with free electricity. Greed is bull shit.

League in particular, I don't know if I like the game. I rarely get to play the game as it was intended to be played. I am constantly dealing with people that seem to want to make others suffer. I can't remember the last time anyone talked about team composition in champion select. Just yesterday, I remember 3 remakes and 3 games with afks. I had to ask a Nunu to use blood boil 4 fucking times while he was on full mana. I had a team mate Teemo build attack speed and was farming the jungle while we were hitting the nexus. Just yesterday, at least 8 games where I had to put up with bull shit.

LordofStone1 votes

{quoted}

I'm about to rant sorry.

I've always been one that values game play over graphics. Todays video game industry does not agree with me.

I also have come to value money differently as I got older. I can not justify spending $60+ on a game I don't even know if I like. I'd rather buy food and water for a month. Which ends up pissing me off when I think about it. Take the billions of dollars these video games make and we could easily supply the entire world population with free electricity. Greed is bull shit.

League in particular, I don't know if I like the game. I rarely get to play the game as it was intended to be played. I am constantly dealing with people that seem to want to make others suffer. I can't remember the last time anyone talked about team composition in champion select. Just yesterday, I remember 3 remakes and 3 games with afks. I had to ask a Nunu to use blood boil 4 fucking times while he was on full mana. I had a team mate Teemo build attack speed and was farming the jungle while we were hitting the nexus. Just yesterday, at least 8 games where I had to put up with bull shit.

Your just human my man, no need to apologize. I just got off restriction for 14 days and found i really do not miss this game much. There are better games out there that will not punish you for the occasional mishap. This game has an automated system now that does not take into context. Just do yourself a favor and mute everyone at the get go. I have found that there is not much of a need to log in anymore. I just play one game a day and have not thought about it. Once you get away from the game for awhile, you will laugh about how silly you were about it. Peace my friend.

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}

And the rest of my response?

Ready to admit Riot is vindictive?

I simply disagree that there is NO possible negative outcome from that situation, and, since we disagree on that fundamental element, did not see a benefit to continuing further.

Awf Meta1 votes

So ignoring the part about there being no prevention, no encouragement, and no discouragement?

Not even going to provide an example of these so called negative outcomes?

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}So ignoring the part about there being no prevention, no encouragement, and no discouragement?

This is accurate. Aside from a lost account with no way to regain it, there is no prevention, encouragement, or discouragement to make a new account.

Not even going to provide an example of these so called negative outcomes?

As you said: "1 reformed player getting their account back is worth 10000 toxic players attempting and failing to get their accounts back."

I would rather not give those 10,000 toxic players a hope of a reward, as, per Riot's data, at least some of them would simply stop playing completely. If even 10% of them to, that's 1,000 less toxic players in the community. My personal thoughts are that encouraging all of them to try again by offering a light at the end of the tunnel just makes more of them stick around.

You may disagree. That's fine. This is my opinion, not a debate I wish to continue.

sheep1X1 votes

If riot would want to put some time and a little bit of effort into this, im sure that they will figure a way to filter those 1203910 toxic players. i mean, reformed players who are really reformed, you would see them, and you would know they are real reformed players, i know this sounds kinda stupid, but moving on, let me propose this;

a system can be implamented , that will run alongside the current tribunal, where reformed players could submit their newley created account (not really new, but you know what i mean), and using their chat logs to determine if they are reformed or not. and even give something like the monthley card, after they have been/ been not qualified.

trust me if riot will want to do this, they will, its not like they are a team of 10 people who cant do this with their current manpower, they branches all around the world, full of employees that are dedicating their time just to make this game better and better as the days go on.

and it might even not be that complex to do, if the system (tribunal) can determine if youre toxic or not, then the reform system can determine if youre reformed.

[slayer-jinx-wink]

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}a system can be implamented , that will run alongside the current tribunal, where reformed players could submit their newley created account (not really new, but you know what i mean), and using their chat logs to determine if they are reformed or not. and even give something like the monthley card, after they have been/ been not qualified.

The issue is that if a player is permanently banned, it's because they've shown an unwillingness to reform. Riot's official policy is that they don't want that player playing League, and, although they're aware they can't really stop them, the high failure rate of the reform experiments has left them unwilling to implement any system to ENCOURAGE banned players to keep playing, which this does (by offering a reward at the end -- your old account back).

sheep1X1 votes

Let me tell you, im not exaggerating, i wasnt that toxic before i got banned, thing is, when i play the game now, im not only keeping an eye on myself, im even watching out for players who flame, whether they are on my team or not, i ask them to stop, and even warn them of whats coming for them if they keep going down that road, but who am i to judge myself right?

now i know its a bit cocky to say that im 100% reform, and even a better player, after i got the ban, but if you look at my new chat logs/honors youll see that im doing pretty well in terms of making everybodys game feel a little bit more fun (or atleast im trying to).

thats my case, and my new account is "GP Barrel boy", and even though its fairly new, i think (again hard to judge myself in that aspecy, meaning its only opinion of how i conceve and play the game, which is probably is not far from the truth, i feel bad when i lie, trust me, had that since i was little XD, just couldnt lie, only tell the truth partially AT MOST.

im sure that the reformed players are out there and there are some who do deserve their accounts back, dont you agree? but they are a few compared to the truley toxic. thats the only problem i see really, but i dont see why cant a system that permanently bans you from the game can determine the opposite, or even better, be more accurate and harsh at times if needed, and even make the current tribunal more efficent (if theyll work on the whole behaviour system as a whole).

again, my opinion, and i get your side dont get me wrong. [vlad-salute]

Awf Meta1 votes

My personal thoughts are that encouraging all of them to try again by offering a light at the end of the tunnel just makes more of them stick around.

I just wish you would realize that it is not an encouragement to "stick around and continue to be negative". It is an encouragement to "stick around and reform". The "and reform" is so important. They go into the "system" knowing they must reform or they will simply be punished again. The same exact thing is happening in the current "system". They make a new account knowing they must reform or they will simply be punished again. There is no "gaming the system".

ModThe Djinn3 votes

{quoted}I just wish you would realize that it is not an encouragement to "stick around and continue to be negative". It is an encouragement to "stick around and reform". The "and reform" is so important. They go into the "system" knowing they must reform or they will simply be punished again.

This is what the level 20 challenge did as well. It specifically hand-selected players who wished to reform their behavior. It had over a 95% failure rate.

I cannot support any program that encourages toxic players to rejoin when the previous program that did exact this thing (encouraged players to play again and reform to earn back their accounts) had such a high rate of reversion to toxicity.

shrugs

We will just have to agree to disagree.

Awf Meta1 votes

What is the current rate of reform?

You expect me to believe offering a reward for reforming has a higher failure rate than offering no reward for reforming?

AeroWaffle1 votes

It doesn't prevent them from trying again. Creating a new account is not discouraged in any way. No prevention, no discouragement, no encouragement.

What, exactly, could Riot realistically do to prevent someone from creating an account in a F2P game?

The Highest Noon1 votes

{quoted}

What, exactly, could Riot realistically do to prevent someone from creating an account in a F2P game?

The same thing they do when you're ID Banned: ban you when they know it's you.

AeroWaffle1 votes

The ID ban worked for Tyler because he streams.

I don't doubt that he likely had an un-banned account that he played on, just never showed it during streams.

For everyone else, to find out that one account is a certain player that was previously banned is much more difficult and not worth the effort or the risk of falsely banning someone. If they create a new account and not be an asshole Riot has no reason to ban them. If they join back in and behave just as rude the system will clean them up once again.

The Highest Noon1 votes

I was just saying lol you asked what Riot could realistically do and that's literally all they could do--ID Ban. It's difficult to know but not wholly impossible, just insanely improbable without anything to witness such as, as you said, streams.

AeroWaffle1 votes

It being insanely improbable seems to contradict it being a realistic solution.

The Highest Noon1 votes

{quoted}

It being insanely improbable seems to contradict it being a realistic solution.

It's not unrealistic until it's completely impossible.

AeroWaffle1 votes

Not impossible on an individual basis.

Impossible as a solution for the problem as a whole.

The Highest Noon1 votes

{quoted}

Not impossible on an individual basis.

Impossible as a solution for the problem as a whole.

No problem has a whole solution, so that's not really relevant here. It's the only solution that's possible, despite how difficult it is.

LordofStone1 votes

{quoted}

I really do think that, reformed players, who play the game on their not banned account without flaming, or not even showing a tad bit of toxicty, do not deserve a PERM BAN, not saying that the punishment isnt well deserved, it sometimes is, but in some cases (and let me tell you, most of them), people reform, and change their ways... im putting this thought out there because, perm bans arent really a good solution, especially when they are able to create a new account and fully reform (me inclded), seeing their old account rot, knowing they cant go back to it, just puts salt on their wounds (even if tehy acomplish more in their new account).

so let me raise this; THERE ARE ALTERNETIVES. for example, why arent seasonal bans are a thing? a season is a well long enough time to reform (for players for players who TRULEY want to, again, me included), seasonal bans can range from 1 to a couple of seasons, not nesseccerally condeming the account to not be played again.

share your thoughts on this thread! even if you do not support it, share your thought, and even leave a solution, that might be good enough to replace the perm ban.

the community will surely appreciate reformed players, since they are more careful with their behaviour, and are certainly nicer than most averege players (again, REFORMED players). they surely do better in terms of behaviour than most people i see playing, day to day, who cant control their temper and are still out there, ruining games to people, now, im not here to say that reformed players werent toxic, some of them were active ones, some passive aggresive, and some just had a vurst of flaming that got them banned, but reformed players get their title for a reason, they are REFORMED, keep in mind that some of them (me included) will do anything within their reach to get their beloved accounts back, even if it means giving up on some things back in their old account, even though most of them get a higher rank thanks to behaviour improvement, some just miss their account, that is full of skins, and glorious, level 7's on all of their most loved champs, and even replays they had on their old account.

i know this topic is very controversial matter, so please dont comment aggresive/obvious things that will make fun of either sides.

dont be afraid though, express your thoughts to the fullest, just with a bit of subtelty.

hf discussing ideas and thoughs :) [slayer-pantheon-popcorn] i would really appreciate if you take the time to even leave you opinio on the matter.

The bans have gotten silly this year. I have never been chat restricted or banned till this year. I have played this since it came out as it was time for a break from dota What is said in joking or in anger, is pretty much the same. Your average player will get angry at least 1 game out of 100. This is very low as it is more 30 times out of a 100 games. If your chat gets out of line it is easy to get banned very quickly.

I know some of my fellow banned players are reading this so take some advice from someone that just got through a recent ban. Now I was going to quit the game, but I did spend real money for skins. My first advice, find a different game to play most of the time. I play games to blow off steam and have fun after a long stressful week at work. In this current system, just think of it like going to work. You do not joke around or say things that are "culturally insensitive" or "racist" or "homophobic". This relates to what is acceptable as political philosophy is deeply entrenched in this game.

So if you want to continue to play league do this. Do not get drawn into conversations at all. Just tell your team during selection that you have been banned previously or chat restricted, just ping you where you are needed. DO NOT GET DRAWN INTO CONVERSATIONS. You may find as I am, the game is just not enjoyable. I already compete in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, so my need to have to "compete" in something else is just not there. If you find you can not take the tantrums from other players and dream about choking the stupid out of them, probably not the game to play.

I play one game a day, that is it. I went back to playing Eve Online in my off time which is more enjoyable as I can be myself. This means I can joke, rant and rave without getting banned. Most people there are around 30-40 years old, so its a different crowd. I was a bit angry a few days ago about my ban and chat restriction here, until I thought about why I played games.

The Highest Noon1 votes

Tbh I see no reason as to why permanent bans exist specifically because Riot does not care about alternate accounts. Why set up a rule punishing access to their game if you wholly allowed to bypass the punishment and play on a different account?

Especially when it comes to bans based on chat. It'd be more sensible to just remove their chat access altogether instead of banning them from gameplay, since gameplay isn't actually the problem it's chat. Kill the chat and I doubt people will make new accounts for the sake of talking in-game.

zPOOPz4 votes

Because you lose all levels, skins, champs, rank, account statistics, account name, honor etc. on the new account

The Highest Noon1 votes

{quoted}

Because you lose all levels, skins, champs, rank, account statistics, account name, honor etc. on the new account

And how many banned players do you think actually cares about that, though? If they did, they wouldn't be getting permanently banned in the first place, nor would they have multiple accounts. What you pay for aside, most of that stuff you get from general gameplay anyway so it's not that big a deal to lose.

zPOOPz2 votes

How many players care about having a very big champ pool, able to play all game modes including ranked, a lot of emotes and wards, victorious skins in some case TO having NOTHING but the free champ rotation and locked out of most game modes for quite a while being forced to play in the toxic pool that is Blind Pick?

I don't know. I don't know how many people would care to go from their main to a level 1 account....

The Highest Noon1 votes

TBH, I'unno. But considering people already do that on alternate accounts...I'm assuming not many. Considering PBE has a dedicated playerbase, it's still not very many.

Those said, it doesn't take that long to get to level 30 and play ranked. Less than a month with average effort, far less if you dedicate your time to it. The rest don't actually matter because, again, it all comes with gameplay.

sheep1X1 votes

Let me tell you, its partially right, but you get attached to your account at times. no matter what you have, and what you had, meaning, i feel good playing my main account, having comfidence, know how old it is, and how much ive gone thourgh with itm makes me feel good about me playing the game, wasting hours and hours of my life on it. just knowing the fact that i get rewards (which are essencially just things displayed on a computer monitor which runs programs with code that tell it to do that), it makes me happy, makes me feel full of joy and satisfaction. starting it all over again is not the same. let me tell you, going adc with ghost heal not knowing what youre doing (even not knowing whats adc, doesnt feel like the first time i played with my banned account, going ap yi bot, or something whacky like that.

The Highest Noon1 votes

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned that some people actually have alt accounts dedicated to being toxic. Something I've had to see and deal with. Sure they get reported, and punished, but with the way punishments work they just go some games without being toxic then go right back to being toxic because it's an alt account dedicated to toxicity.

sheep1X1 votes

wow, good thought there, but let me tell you, the alternate accounts ive came across are more for trolling, and less flaming which is still a severe issue, but is less related to players getting their mindset completley redone, reformed, to fit the behaviour of the game, those are problems which the commmunity can report on, people who are banned and reformed can express their thoughts on perm bans, because is you scroll around the page and look at it, every comment regarding the good side of what i said, got a vote down, and the same applies to the oopsite.

Yummy Sashimi1 votes

In my opinion, seasonal ban could be a good thing where as the previous ban system turns a two week ban straight into perma ban. I wish riot will implement a ban system like this: normal 2 week->seasonal ban(1 year) instead of permanent ban->perma ban. This way, people will feel more obligated to reform after they stop playing for a year. Right now I feel like two week ban is too short for people to realize oh crap, I'm toxic, I will lose my account if I keep being toxic. If a player gets banned for a year and come back, they may value their account more and hopefully to reform. I'm not saying to completely remove perma ban but to add a seasonal ban in between can be a good thing.

sheep1X1 votes

Just some food for thought, look at the whole behaviour thread, there are so much players asking for advice of being not toxic, or reformed, meaning even those who arent reformed, want to be, deep down, they want to change and will put any effort needed to stop being toxic, or reformed.

talking about ethics, humans are capble of changing their behaviour as a whole, only if they want to, and you can clearly see that there are alot of those who are trying, and there are some who did change their mindset of the game and how it should be player, in a good way (or atleast i hope so :/).

keep that in mind, as thats the thing that seperates good, behaving, well set on how to play the game and use the chat properley,and those who are the opposite.

kushinshin1 votes

Djinn keeps screaming about the statistics and data but can only reference one poorly executed experiment by Riot. Requesting sources for all the data and statistics of which the entire community, excluding yourself, is lacking.

More from Player Behavior