"He lost us the game" ( REPOST ) [ Simplified for little kids like YOU to understand ]

YOU LOST LMAO·1/25/2017, 9:59:58 PM·1 votes·1,093 views

Funny thing is that he did good enough to make a team of 4 brilliant human beings to fail at a game. It's like I'm getting reported for enemy team taking the ball away from me at basketball... and that I can be good enough to make a team of 4 lose so hard without handing them the ball intent to the enemy or afking (standing around)

Simplified for your tiny brains: He lost us the game = team is blaming one person for the loss "funny thing is that he did good enough to make a team of 4 brilliant human beings to fail at a game" = that lone person was able to put down an entire team of 4.
brilliant human beings = because they think they are higher than the lone feeder. brilliant = sarcasm

"its like I'm getting reported for enemy team taking the ball away from me at basketball" analogy starts "i can be good enough to make a team of 4 lose so hard without handing them the ball intent to the enemy for afking (standing around) = I was able to put down a team of 4 without int'ing, or afking, yet still being kicked from the team (analogy)

. . . .

Ending statement: Come on kids, do we really not understand how to dig deep in the meaning of words and phrases? So many negative feedback because you guys had no idea what the above statement meant. Keep telling me to stay in English class, because to me it seems like you're the one that needs to. Oh i'm sorry, did I mean your the one? Because that makes no sense since it's the wrong word you have used.

9 Comments

Serevas1/25/2017, 10:12:44 PM7 votes

The reason people are irritated by your post and are telling you to go back to English class is as follows.

He did good enough to make a team of 4 fail at a game.

Unless there's some play at sarcasm here, I fail to understand how you can do good enough to make a team of 4 fail, assuming this is your 4 teammates, without it having been intentional.

You then go on to say

and that I can be good enough to make a team of 4 lose so hard without handing them the ball intent to the enemy or afking

First these two statements actually contradict one another, let alone the second contradicting itself.

Next intent isn't the word you're looking for, you're looking for intentionally. Intent is a noun, while intentionally is an adverb, utilizing the proper word form is important.

Furthermore "without handing them the ball intent to the enemy", has such screwed up and horrific syntax that I can't even begin to understand how you don't get why people are telling you to go back to English class.

It's hard for people to understand the points you're trying to get across when they weren't written with proper syntax, nor word usage. That's why you got so much negative feedback about it.

warpenguin5551/25/2017, 10:15:25 PM3 votes

Do you do anything other than get banned and come on here to bitch about it?

Kei1431/26/2017, 12:14:54 AM2 votes

Wut. You sense do not make.