With all the money that they make, they don't want to afford game admins
Considering how poorly the Tribunal went - which consisted of the entire League of Legends community - I doubt they're going to hire a modest handful of Administrators to try to do something that already failed.
Also, you can't just throw money at a problem and make it go away.
instead they put a stupid automatic system that bans you because you wrote triggered words.
It doesn't work 100% off of trigger words. Yes, there are some scant few keywords that will automatically trigger a punishment if seen in review ("kys" and various forms of hate speech), but if I recall correctly, one of the Forum Mods mentioned that the IFS works off of a pretty thorough algorithm that allows it to detect speech patterns and the meanings behind them.
So, if you're flaming - I.E., aggravatedly throwing hate at a specific player, or at any non-specific player - the IFS'll pick up on it and punish you appropriately.
The bot Doesn't care of seeing the whole game scenario and doesn't empathize. A real person would not full punish if you are counterflaming/someone else is inting. You can't treat the flame starter, and the person that's defending himself the same way.
Back in the Tribunal, people were punished for flaming regardless of whether or not they started it, or if they were flaming someone who was trolling or feeding. Because, guess what? People dislike flamers just as much as trolls and feeders. Hence why the IFS punishes flamers regardless of circumstance.
Also, empathy and context don't matter. If you flamed "because someone was inting", you flamed. The only way you can "defend yourself" is by muting the person flaming you.
And the system is completely bs, because now you know what? You can still flame people, just try not to tell them trigger words like kys, or flame using ascii's (i think bot is good enough to detect numbers but idk)
Again, the above statement is false, as (if I'm not mistaken, Prandine? Don't quote me though - and, Prandine/whoever I'm actually quoting, if I'm misattributing quotes, feel free to point it out.) the IFS can detect speech patterns, and I'm pretty sure it can understand ASCII replacements. (If we're talking printable characters, of course.)
Innocent people can still be banned coz they say "kill myself, i am so bad" "i wanna die" "i suck" because bot doesn't care about context.
The first statement is false, and the second statement doesn't matter. Read above.
I'd rather have to wait an ethernity to get people banned than this stupid istantfeedback report bot.
I'm pretty sure you mean "I want my toxicity to go under the radar longer".
With more Game Admins actually seeing the game inting people bans can become possible, and people would complain less about toxicity bans.
No. Hypothetically, it is possible to increase the chance that intentional feeding can get caught through use of human review, but again: there is no way that can be accomplished efficiently. So, you actually effectively LOWER the chance that intentional feeders get caught by replacing the IFS with human Administrators.
Second - sure, we would like less people complaining about toxicity bans, but not in this way. I'd rather toxic players be here on the boards complaining about their justified bans than out playing League of Legends and ruining the game for everyone else.
