Ive been thinking a bit about player banning system
So I have lot of friends that I know are not bad people, but in competitive enviroment, when things get heated, they once every few days turn into a really mean person :D. Some of them even piling up impressive permabanned acc numbers.
I dont think permabanning is a fair solution to verbal harassment and here is why.
I know people get lot of chances to reform, but in 2K17 where "being negative" is a legit report reason, its literally impossible for a bit more temperament players to not sooner or later get banned. Who doesnt get angry sometimes? Who doesnt say something negative sometimes?
I have an analogy for this.
So lets imagine a society where there are only 2 crimes, the lesser crime - lets say theft(verbal toxicity), and the bigger crime - lets say murder(Griefing, Using Hacks, Being toxic through gameplay). Murderers are notoriously hard to catch in this society, because its forensics concerning muderer catching are very unevolved. On the other hand, the society figured out a way to easily catch even thieves that stole a grain of salt from someone else.
Now, lets say that in this imaginary society, cutting off your hands (permamute punishment) completely removes your ability to steal, but does not remove your ability to murder. Death sentence (permanent ban) removes your ability to either steal or murder. Also if a person steals from you once, you can forever tag them to be never able to steal from you again in this imaginary world (mute button).
Riot is saying that because murderers are notoriously hard to catch, its fair to punish thieves with the death sentence.
How does that make any fucking sense at all? Why overkill because of mine incompetence to punish people that do the worse crime? How did riot manage to convince the massess that this is somehow fair and just?
I didnt mean to offend anyone, if I did Im sorry :D
Also, yes, I just got my first chat restriction in 4 years for saying "stfu alrdy plz" and calling someone dumb.