Can we PLEASE punish inters (including soft inters) the same way or worse than toxic writers???

Sergeant Wea·4/11/2019, 6:33:52 PM·2 votes·2,196 views

It's a God damn fucking travesty that people can int, lightly flame, stay in base while still typing, and get an equal punishment as someone who flames back. ON WHAT FUCKING PLANET IS THIS FAIR.

I woudln't flame if people int-- that's the root of the problem!!!!! Under zero circumstances should the person who retaliates get pushed more sever than the person who initiates it- it's a buck of fucking cock-and-bull and NEEDS to be looked at.

14 Comments

TheUrbanKitsune4/11/2019, 6:41:49 PM4 votes

It's harder for Riot's system to detect inting vs having a bad game, otherwise to my knowledge THEY ARE punished in the same way as people who are toxic in chat. Also, reminder that YOU are the only person responsible for YOUR actions. If you decide to flame someone-- trolling or not, you better be prepared to face the consequences.

Umbral Regent4/11/2019, 8:45:18 PM3 votes

Can we PLEASE punish inters (including soft inters) the same way or worse than toxic writers???

Okay, first of all, take a moment to think about what it is exactly that you're asking for here.

You're asking for people who troll and intentionally feed to be punished in the same capacity as chat toxicity...Which is more lenient in comparison to gameplay toxicity right now.

And you're essentially asking that trolls/intentional feeders be given punishments that are generally ineffectual in relation to the offense - because the first two punishment tiers for chat toxicity are chat restrictions, which would mean literally nothing to trolls and intentional feeders.

Of course, I am focusing primarily on the part where you say "the same way" here, since gameplay toxicity is already punished more harshly than chat toxicity, so the latter statement is a moot point.

It's a God damn fucking travesty that people can int, lightly flame, stay in base while still typing, and get an equal punishment as someone who flames back.

I'm not sure you're playing the same game here. Intentionally feeding is punished with a 14-day ban on the first offense, whereas flaming is punished with a 10-game Chat Restriction on the first offense, exempting hate speech.

They don't get equal punishments; intentional feeders and trolls get harsher punishments than chat offenses. It is (unfortunately) a pretty common misconception to say that trolls are punished equally or more leniently than chat toxicity; the truth is that it's less frequent due to difficulty in ascertaining the offense, not that they're treated equally.

Under zero circumstances should the person who retaliates get pushed more sever than the person who initiates it...

Again, that isn't the case. Assuming both Player A and Player B flame each other, with Player A instigating and Player B retaliating, if both players get reported, both players will get equal punishment. (And, this is assuming that they both flame but don't use hate speech.)

The only cases where one player will get a more severe punishment than another is if they committed a more severe offense; for example, hate speech, encouragements of self-harm, trolling, and intentionally feeding are all punished harsher than chat toxicity and flame.

Xidphel4/11/2019, 9:52:50 PM2 votes

Can we PLEASE punish inters (including soft inters) the same way or worse than toxic writers???

Sure. Here's my idea:

Inters get instant 14-day ban. Make sure they're actual inters, though. They could be hard to identify (I'm no pro but I do my best to win every game I'm in despite my horrid K:D ratio).

Have those who abuse chat to flame get their chat muted for a couple of games (I'm thinking 10). If they continue after a while, remove their chat for a bit longer (25 maybe?) THEN you can ban them for 2 weeks. However, while suicide and hate speech are a problem, Riot should probably instantly ban those. 14 day should be a good enough time to make sure that kind of shit is not wanted here.

So what do you think?

Telephone Booth4/12/2019, 2:07:28 AM2 votes

Soft intentional feeding is intentional feeding. Idk why you specify like that. You can get banned for inting once, or ten times. Granted, its rare, since intent is harder to prove than chat offenses.

Also im pretty sure the minimum punishment for inting is a 14 day ban, whereas the minimum punishment for chat offenses is a 10 game chat restrict. So already, objectively, inters are punished more severely.

Kei1434/11/2019, 6:51:27 PM1 votes

I just got a punishment notification for unsportsmanlike conduct today. I've now gotten a total of 4 in the past 30 days.

Ph03n1xb1rd4/12/2019, 12:04:45 PM1 votes

No, we cant, because it is always just a "bad game".