"We do not allow name and shame on these boards"

Dasdi96··6 votes·928 views

Meanwhile the red post is the literal textbook definition of a name and shame thread.

11 Comments

My Sea Cow11 votes

they did it because if they didn't give somewhat of a reason why Tyler1 was banned, it would just be post after post after annoying post about Tyler1....but sadly it's still happening. He deserved the ban and Riot did things correctly. Regardless if he was SLOWLY reforming, he wasn't reforming fast enough and Riot had to finally put their foot down after 18+ accounts of his being permabanned

MysticPriestess1 votes

I agree. He needed to reform a bit faster and I am all for him reforming and becoming productive in the community.

I just hate how Riot won't look at their golden children (Pro LCS players) and punish them if they are being toxic or trollish too. If Riot wants to be fair in their justice then they need to address EVERYONE not just 1 or 2 extremely toxic players, but all of them. Especially players that have streams that just go AFK while still streaming for no reasons at all. Negative attitude, Verbal Abuse, AFK, Intentional Feeding, Hate Speech, Cheating, and Offensive or inappropriate summoner name: those are the report options at the end of a game for a single player. Riot needs to look at ALL of these for EVERYONE (golden children included and well as popular ones). End of story.

Tip for Riot: You want more $$$, then make the community fair and just. The LoL peeps will love you more for it.

Sarutobi5 votes

{quoted}

I agree. He needed to reform a bit faster and I am all for him reforming and becoming productive in the community.

I just hate how Riot won't look at their golden children (Pro LCS players) and punish them if they are being toxic or trollish too. If Riot wants to be fair in their justice then they need to address EVERYONE not just 1 or 2 extremely toxic players, but all of them. Especially players that have streams that just go AFK while still streaming for no reasons at all. Negative attitude, Verbal Abuse, AFK, Intentional Feeding, Hate Speech, Cheating, and Offensive or inappropriate summoner name: those are the report options at the end of a game for a single player. Riot needs to look at ALL of these for EVERYONE (golden children included and well as popular ones). End of story.

Tip for Riot: You want more $$$, then make the community fair and just. The LoL peeps will love you more for it.

Are they actually being toxic in chat, or on their stream? There is a HUGE difference when someone is breaking the rules that Riot has place in their game, and how someone is acting in their own stream. Also note that they could be playing in a full team. If they are "trolling" with their teammates i highly doubt theyll report their own friend. it could have been just the same with Tyler HAD he played with people he knew, but he didnt. he acted like a troll/toxic towards people he didnt know, which isnt right.

Lost R1 votes

Except they have, and they did. One LCS player was banned for toxic behavior a few years ago DURING the tournament, when his team made it to the semifinals.

The Deckowner1 votes

right off the back of my head, xiaoweixiao was banned for a year for elo boosting, hai was also.punished forbpointing middle finger to febiven.

DJColdCutz2 votes

Here's an idea: they give him a private e-mail like they would do for anyone else, and then Tyler1 can choose whether or not to show it on his stream, like anyone else. socrates is a hypocrite.

dapositiveviking1 votes

socrates was the messenger. don't kill the messenger.

AzureDragoon2 votes

In this case, it falls squarely into a case of Tyler being a public figure.

Tyler by no means, hid his behavior. By not only streaming his actions, but also, taking pride in the fact that he had over a dozen and a half accounts banned, and the title of "Most Toxic Player", let alone monetizing his streaming off of those things, he has voluntarily opened himself up to public opinion regarding his actions. Especially, when it comes to displaying behavior, which Riot does not approve of in their game.

Cyst2 votes

{quoted}

Meanwhile the red post is the literal textbook definition of a name and shame thread.

You never been in a SJW safe space before?

buneter1 votes

what would be the point of it?

Agent20901 votes

Seems to me that it was a message to the community, a show of force, if you will.

A "look what we did to this popular streamer for toxicity, think we'll have a problem doing it to you?" sort of message.

More from Player Behavior

More by Dasdi96