It's clear that the current system can't detect bad behavior very well if it's not in the chat, so why not let us decide? This new tribunal could also be used to determine if a player is intentionally throwing the game in other ways, botting, scripting, or boosting.
Tribunal.... is dead for now If we bring it back, what would change from when it was active in the 1st place It was slow, and once the reward was taken away it was even slower
Not a bad idea (dunno where all the downvotes are coming from), but there is a risk there. Lots of folks seem willing to call noobish mistakes "inting", to the point where I'm not sure I'd trust decisions on the matter to be left to the community. It's popular to say things like "There's never a valid excuse to die X times in lane" or "Ban anybody with ten or more deaths in a game", while obviously exceptions are always going to exist.
I would love to see it done in a non-consequential fashion, though, similar to The Verdict. Show us clips of people accused of inting, let us vote, and then compare our opinions to that of the system.
There isn't really a practical way to review these things. I think the best thing to do is inform players what inting is: Did he state he was trying to lose? Did he act, even briefly, on trying to lose?
Item sets and running it down lane are very easy to detect, but the edge cases are what needs more help from the player base in accurately reporting problematic players.
