Question about the Automated detection of verbal abuse

Generally, I have been a fan of the automated verbal abuse detection system. I understand the way neural networks work, and reporting gives the net a great training set to detect toxic language. But is the net set up such that it can recognize verbal abuse spread out over many lines of text, such as this?

If not, can this be looked into?

If not, can we have tribunal back? :/ This is obvious to a human, but hard for computers to pick up. I imagine there are other ways of obfuscating stuff from the neural net responsible for moderating toxicity reports.

((Note: last time I posted this, it got deleted because I forgot to scrub the names from the screenshot. My apologies; my intent was not to "bring attention to" the person doing this posting, but to raise a discussion on the possible avoidance of triggering the Verbal Abuse detection system.))