Just So I'm Clear About Chat Bans
Just so I'm clear:
I can have 2 AFKers, 1 feeder and one bot on my team (Four games in a row, but let's focus on the one that I got a 5 game ban for) and in addition, have the entire other team rip on me/my "team" as we get steam rolled into a 22 minute loss. That's cool.
But me explaining what was going on with my team, without cursing, nets me a chat ban? Again, keep in mind the other team was ripping on my the whole time.
Who judges these chat bans, and are the circumstances considered in totality? What qualifies the reviewers to pass judgement?
This seems like a very arbitrary process (not to be confused with arbitration, in which a person listens to both sides and then makes a bind decision) and I suspect the whole thing is automated. What protection is there from someone just being a sore loser and then reporting the entire team that beat him?
Are the standards of what are considered "appropriate" totally G-Rated? That's an honest question because going back through my cited chat ban, the worst I can find is a few references I made to "my retarded team" (trust me, they were) as well as a few WTF abbreviations thrown in.
Please. Enlighten me, so that I know whether or not I just should play an inherently-social game with absolutely zero social interaction (to avoid another dreaded chat ban) outside of dialog seen in the movie Bambi, or if there can be expected to be a bit of "real talk." I mean c'mon, the game is about killing other players as energetically as possible. How can that concept be so juxtaposed with such quick hammer-felling when chat crests into the PG-13 zone?
in b4 salty comments - I'm honestly curious how these decisions are made.