Inting/AFK ranked penalties

PharoahJerah·4/3/2019, 8:47:17 PM·1 votes·1,774 views

I think if you have a player that Int's or AFK's purposely on either team then their lp loss should be significantly higher than those on his or her team. Possibly less lp loss for the teammates that have to put up with players like that.

4 Comments

Imperial Pandaa4/3/2019, 8:49:30 PM1 votes

Design a system that can detect 100% accurate real time and market it.

zPOOPz4/3/2019, 8:51:57 PM1 votes

int, when detected, already received escalated punishment of 14 days on first offense ON TOP of the LP loss. Problem comes when normal players cannot tell the difference between UNINTentionally feeding and INTentionally feeding.

Legitimate afk reasons exist (internet company pooped, power outage in your area pooped, your mom accidentally cut herself while cooking your dinner, etc.). Should these people get significant penalty for doing the right thing and leave game to put bandage on mom's hand? Also, it be open season to flame and abuse teammate so he will afk just so people can selfishly take less lp loss.

GatekeeperTDS4/3/2019, 9:00:48 PM1 votes

The only thing LP can be tied to 100% is winning or losing the game. Destroying the Nexus is the measure of whether a team "deserves" LP or not.

Possibly less lp loss for the teammates that have to put up with players like that.

Having LP affected by anything else but a destroyed Nexus affects the accuracy of the ranking system. As I've said in other threads, whether you've lost OR won LP due to an AFK player on your team or the opponent's team, the gain or loss of LP from that instance is not enough to affect your ability to climb in any significant manner.

Telephone Booth4/6/2019, 5:19:09 AM1 votes

Yeah, that'd be great. But its not very realistic.