Bring it back!

MustardTigerMK·1/24/2019, 5:07:29 PM·1 votes·2,522 views

Permanent chat restrictions over permanent bans. Make it so it is impossible to permanently ban someone over chat, restrict their chat! If they insist on physically being toxic (pings, feeding, etc.) then permanently ban them. Easy. It is harder to tell if someone is int but I mean if enough reports come in then.....common sense factors in here. Give people with the permanent chat restriction pre loaded chat "GL HF" "GG" and "Thanks" limit the amount of times they can say it though.

38 Comments

RallerenP1/24/2019, 5:46:16 PM4 votes

Give people with the permanent chat restriction pre loaded chat "GL HF" "GG" and "Thanks" limit the amount of times they can say it though.

"GL HF" he said in chat, but he had already clicked under the mid lane tower. There was no other way he could ruin to game, and he knew this was the only way.

Seriously. There is a reason Riot removed the permanent chat restrictions. They just didn't work. The people toxic enough to actually get them would just start inting instead.

MustardTigerMK1/24/2019, 5:14:14 PM2 votes

{quoted}

Give people with the permanent chat restriction pre loaded chat "GL HF" "GG" and "Thanks" limit the amount of times they can say it though.

Great idea! With preloaded chat for toxic people you essentially make it so their only option is to be friendly within chat creating a non toxic environment.

ModPrandine1/25/2019, 7:12:30 AM2 votes

First off, permanent bans have always existed, even during the days of infinitely scaling chat restrictions.

Second off, from Riot Tantram:

It really breaks down into two categories.

1.) Helping players reform 2.) Shielding others from the behavior, at a cost.

We used to issue chat restrictions that essentially scaled indefinitely.

We were able to determine that after a certain point the penalty no longer helped with reform. The 10-game and 25-game counts for chat restrictions are based on data that they were both light enough, and felt strict enough to encourage people to understand their behavior is unacceptable in game and change it.

We also saw that the players in this 'large restriction' category defaulted to gameplay altering means of harassing their team. It caused an increase in feeding and trolling.

The sample size of this population and time frame is huge. Essentially the time spanning from the introduction of chat restrictions to the introduction of IFS.

So my question for you is, would you rather have more feeders and less negative chat?

If someone isn't gonna behave properly despite being given multiple chances to do so then why shouldn't they be removed from the game?

MustardTigerMK1/25/2019, 4:24:01 AM1 votes

In a world that talks of reform, nobody is very forgiving.

The Highest Noon1/26/2019, 3:51:29 PM1 votes

The process of this debate:

"You shouldn't ban gameplay for non-gameplay offenses" "People will just be toxic in other ways" "Then ban them for that toxicity people already do it anyways" "It's difficult and unfair"

Telephone Booth1/25/2019, 11:11:41 PM1 votes

I guess they tried it years ago. If it worked to their satisfaction, we would still have it today. So no. Theyre not gonna make backwards decisions.

Ritoslostfkboy1/26/2019, 12:25:11 AM1 votes

wouldn't be a problem if the league community wasn't a pile of dog feces but they have never worked on in game community .

PH451/24/2019, 6:40:07 PM1 votes

No. No need to give toxic players any more room to ruin games. They already tried permamuting and it didn't obviously work since it wasn't implemented.