Your peers judged your behavior, but your peers are trolls, so...
This was in an email from my 14 day ban following my supposedly ban worthy chat towards an ally. Just to give some context, I said nothing all game except ff 20 after a clear loss at 15 minutes, and my ally says, "go play normals," which started an interesting conversation between us. I considered it nothing more than bickering. No homophobia, no racism, and nothing too offensive from either of us. Just the usual, "ur bad," "lol you're gold," "and get a brain" type stuff. I get reported and a 14 day ban with an email from Riot reading:
- Your peers judged your behavior to be far below the standards of the League of Legends community.
I mean, this is a joke right? The very guy trash talking me first and reports me is a peer fit to judge my behavior? Sorry Riot, he is not my peer. He is a troll who happened to get me banned because he said some things that pressed my buttons. I'm already losing a game and to have this guy flame me is awesome. Good for him. Also want to point out how troll Riot is for dishing this punishment out via "machine that learns." It takes in no consideration of the context of my chat, nor considers what the other guy says to me. It only reproduces what I've typed, which would obviously look bad by itself. Such injustice is the epitome of fascism. Like going to court, hearing one edited tape, and then making a decision based on nothing else. Just thought it was funny that the email starts off with that statement. Oh, and it also says 0.2% of players get suspended. With about 70 million players per month, isn't banning 140,000 people sort of excessive? I know the US justice system isn't perfect, but at least they're not dishing out death penalties for people arguing with each other.