Mute for chat offenses, ban for gameplay offenses.

Veralion·8/26/2018, 10:50:29 AM·3 votes·2,420 views

If you ban a toxic player who's addicted, they're going to make a new account that they have no attachment to and toxify low level games. Riot is already having a huge problem retaining new players, and I'm willing to bet that's a big reason why. Letting very toxic people continue to play but taking away all chat privileges for several months would be better for everyone. If they act out their toxicity in game by inting, then you can perma them.

Riot needs to also have a much clearer path to reform than they currently do, with more feedback from the system and more positive reinforcement. More little popups that say hey, you're making progress, keep it up, or you were just validly reported, chill out before you get banned. I've played 80 games since being 2 week banned and I'm still checkpoint 0. No idea if I'm making any progress at all. All i type is rawr, xd, and gg.

Riot Blaustoise agrees with me before all you puritans pile onto me. :)

43 Comments

AeroWaffle8/26/2018, 11:58:32 AM9 votes

A similar punishment system was already tried and failed.

People could keep on stacking an endless amount of chat restriction games for chat related offenses, to the point where some people were walking around with 100s or even 1000s of games before they got out of them.

The issue was these people did not stop behaving poorly just because they couldn't chat. Most of them just resorted to gameplay related means to piss off their own teammates. Gameplay related poor behavior is much harder to detect and catch. So that punishment system was discontinued.

Ada Wong8/26/2018, 2:21:54 PM1 votes

They do need to take more action for game-play offenses.

I had two people go off meta bot and intentionally feed / throw earlier.

Then I had a Jungler in my last game just go to my lane and farm cs / grief multiple times.

Likely chance anything will happen nope.

The Highest Noon8/26/2018, 4:25:08 PM1 votes

I'll never understand the pushback against a policity like this.

WHY PUNISH SOMEONE'S GAMEPLAY OVER NON-GAMEPLAY OFFENSES?

"Hurrdurr they'll just feed"

THEN PUNISH THEM FOR FEEDING, OBVIOUSLY.

There's nothing at all wrong about punishing chat-related offenses with chat-related punishments.

There is no justifiable argument against that.