What about good behavior?
Why is only negative behavior considered when deciding a punishment? Shouldn't all the good behavior that the person has displayed also be taken into account?
Why is only negative behavior considered when deciding a punishment? Shouldn't all the good behavior that the person has displayed also be taken into account?
The analogy I have:
"but sir, what about all the times I drove and didn't swerve into another lane" - someone trying to avoid a ticket for a punishment.
It doesn't matter how many times you're good. It matters that you were negative, and ruined the game for others.
I agree.
It should also be applied to our criminal justice system. So if someone commits a major crime, it can be offset by previous "good behavior".
So Mr. Smith you robbed a bank and that was bad. But you spend a lot of weekends volunteering at the homeless shelter so we're gonna let you go this time.
-Check OP.GG- LUL. Okay, I respect your opinions, you obviously are VERY well-versed at knowing what it's like to 'Have someone RUINING "Your" GAMES' xD