Hire Even One Human to Handle Chat Restrictions

Tsuyo·9/3/2017, 6:44:53 AM·2 votes·540 views

Stealing people's ability to talk in game as well as their honor and the key fragments that gives access to is a pretty pathetic thing to do to people who get trolled. When someone ruins your game and you tell them the objective fact that they did the bot Riot uses to penalize people should not deem someone who has already been punished to be the one who gets more punishment. You would think after all the money they have made they could hire at least a single person to replace the bot they use for punishing people for 'toxic behavior' since its obvious they have no real humans dealing with this. No human could ever be such a disgrace that they would not once but twice but four times make the mistake of chat restricting someone who already had to suffer through the torture of the game the griefers created before falsely reporting you to do whatever they can to spite you.

21 Comments

Chermorg9/3/2017, 6:49:21 AM4 votes

Post your chat logs please.

zPOOPz9/3/2017, 6:50:22 AM4 votes

steal stēl/ verb

1.
take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it.
"thieves stole her bicycle"
synonyms:	purloin, thieve, take, take for oneself, help oneself to, loot, pilfer, run off with, abscond with, carry off, shoplift;

SnyperWulff9/3/2017, 11:15:27 AM3 votes

The dude would never sleep, imagine if youwil how many people play League (about 100 million) a month. Now imagine how many play every day (guesstimate of around 3 million per day). And out of that imagine if a quarter of those players are reported. Say around 600,000.

Stay with me, even if he did 1 review per minute, with no breaks, for a straight eight hours every day, that's ONLY 840 a day. It would be impossible for the person to get anything meaningful done.

On the other hand a bot can do it 24/7/365 at a much faster pace.

It's simple, don't reply, mute, and report. You are responsible for your words and actions.

Subdue9/4/2017, 2:12:07 PM2 votes

The first step in convincing anyone that the bot is incorrectly assessing penalties on players is to show an instance of such an error. So far you have not done this very important step.

TLDR: Logs?

Tsuyo9/3/2017, 7:40:05 AM1 votes

It's hilarious that you would make mistake of thinking I don't know what steal means and tells me all i need to know about you.

Tsuyo9/4/2017, 5:15:28 AM1 votes

I'll just restate the main idea which is that Riot really should have actually people dishing out punishment rather than bots that have been proven time and time again to be flawed. If they can't enforce their system correctly, they shouldn't have a lazy attempt at it in place.

Reket DeAlk9/4/2017, 5:27:44 AM1 votes

When the IFS was first put into place, they were watching it. They checked most of, if not all, the bans that it issued. (That could just be for permabans, not 100% sure if it was for everything) They had gotten it down to I think 1 in 1000 cases were falsely punished? Again my facts could be off.

Also the whole reason the made the IFS in the first place was because back when the Tribunal was a thing, the amount of cases were FAR exceeding the amount of people that were voting. It would take a long amount of time for anyone to see a punishment. With how big League is as a game and how many people play it and how many reports come flooding in, there's no realistic way humans can keep up with it all. They needed something that could handle these cases at a better rate. Hence, the Instant Feedback System.