Skip to content

Why I'm Toxic

Caretaker Jack··30 votes·10,310 views

Short Version: I hate people who make games unwinnable and then drag you along for 40 minutes.

Long Version:

These people might not even be toxic, but they're far worse than any toxic player in the game. And I wanna be clear, its not because they suck it's because they can't move on. Like, there are bad games you can bounce back from, but i'm not talking about those. I mean the real bad games where these fuckers play so poorly that you don't have a chance without the right comp or 2/5 people doing well enough to carry. I'm talking about those games.

If you're "learning" and you put someone in a game like that, then you shouldn't be so try hard that you're willing to waste 40 minutes of someone else's time to change those low odds (which you caused in the first place.) If that's you, then you don't deserve any more than 15 minutes of that persons time. You have no excuse. If you fucked up early, then you don't need to learn late game, you need to practice early game again and stop dragging your allies through the mud.

If you fail, then do what you can and then accept the loss at 15. How bad is that? You get to play another game and give it another go till you got it down. Its that fucking simple. NA needs to start taking notes from Korea. A region where you need to prove you're worth anything beyond that 15 minute mark or they will _ALL _ go mid. There is no leaver buster over there and computer cafe's $charge$ by the hour. If you're goofing off and having fun at other peoples expense, that's fine. Just be a considerate human being and accept that your "fun" is done at 15... Then you can be someone else's problem.

It really pisses me off that someone can ruin a game and the person that wants to ff is, somehow, the bad guy because he hurt their feelings. Like, really? Weren't you the one who caused the situation? If so, then you're the problem. You don't really deserve a say on who is and isn't toxic. You don't get to talk about your feelings. What you get to do, is stfu and agree to surrender. Otherwise, you're the problem.

I fail to understand the audacity of these people who feel justified in demanding someone else waste their time, beyond 15 minutes, and pour everything they have into that one game that they ruined... Why does that person deserve all this? They didn't put any effort into looking up what they needed or enough into learning from it, but you're supposed to be on your grind and hard carry them? Last I checked, teamwork required everyone to play a part. So, if you want people to stick around, then you should earn it. Its stupid to say that people who put in the effort should be banned because they don't wanna linger longer than 15 in a pointless game.

Dear Riot. make the 15 minute ff the same as the others... Or so fucking help me. -__- (You may down vote now)

93 Comments

disregardable14 votes

the person going 2/8 has no control over your feelings, only you do. whether a game is ruined or not is subjective. lots of other people would continue playing where you keep giving up, and that's a problem.

but as long as you keep it out of chat, Riot won't care.

Caretaker Jack3 votes

{quoted}

the person going 2/8 has no control over your feelings, only you do. whether a game is ruined or not is subjective. lots of other people would continue playing where you keep giving up, and that's a problem.

but as long as you keep it out of chat, Riot won't care.

How you feel about a game is subjective. Weather the game is un-winnable or not is objective... It would do you good to know the difference.

disregardable9 votes

a game is objectively winnable until the enemy team kills your nexus, though.

Caretaker Jack2 votes

{quoted}

a game is objectively winnable until the enemy team kills your nexus, though.

You're being captious and you know it.

disregardable11 votes

no dude, you give up before the game is over, that is your problem. if you gave up when the game was actually over, nobody would report you, because they'd agree with you.

but again, that's fine, as long as you keep it out of chat.

TheSingularity2 votes

tbh If we were before season 6, I'd agree with you. But trying to come back is so futile these days there's so little point. And even if you do, and yes this is subjective, did it feel worth it? Worth all the deaths, all the irritation, all the stupid mistakes you witness and perform when all you want to do is FF and move on? The moment there's a 3/2 vote, 60% of the team has given up and have little to no cares about the outcome.

Long games, as few as they may be like one I had last night (the most recent one in history), both teams were even from the get go. Half our team did good, one of their players did great and it evened out for like 45 minutes. But remove the 3 people who did alright and replace with 3 people who did average. That's a majority of the game people experience and it isn't fun for me or my mates. And statistically speaking, for every 1 there're 100's more who agree and likely just as many who disagree. It's a problem either way

ActualPain2 votes

{quoted}

the person going 2/8 has no control over your feelings, only you do. whether a game is ruined or not is subjective. lots of other people would continue playing where you keep giving up, and that's a problem.

but as long as you keep it out of chat, Riot won't care.

In ranked, a game is ruined if you lose. That's the point of ranked; that's how it works. If you don't see it this way, please don't queue up for ranked.

sir d wreck10 votes

When you enter a game, you enter it with the knowledge that there is a surrender option and people may choose to surrender or not. You have to accept that. If you lose your temper because others don't want to surrender, that should be your problem, not your teammates that now have to deal with someone who can't keep their emotions in check because they don't give up as easy as you do.

I don't like surrendering because I want to learn how to play from behind because anyone can mess up late game and throw it... but it definitely doesn't happen as much as I'd like. Also, if the game dragged out 40+ minutes doesn't that kind of justify the surrender vote failing? If the game is that over, as you say it is, the enemy should win it before 30 minutes.

Kokua6 votes

I've won games where literally everyone else had a negative score at one point in the game, from 5 to 10+ deaths in the negative. We were behind as a team by over 30 deaths. We were playing as a party of 5, so it's not like we were dragging randoms in the match with us. Everyone else wanted to surrender. I told them if they surrendered, I wouldn't play with them anymore, because I don't want to play with people who decide it's time to give up long before the match has been decided. 3 of them pressed yes, one of them decided to press no with me. We split all lanes and just farmed up to make up for past losses, because we knew that grouping at that point wouldn't have worked for us. I started getting kills in bot lane. Jungle started ganking top and making progress up there. Eventually, it got to a point where I was able to 1v3 any of them with ease. We grouped up, won a team fight, pushed 4 turrets, inhib and nexus, and won the game.

You are wasting your own time when you decide to give up early. The longer a game goes on, the more equal your chances of winning or losing become. You got stomped earlier in the game because someone was able to get an upper hand. When they use that advantage, they're able to build 1, 2 or even more full items than other players, depending on how bad they snowballed you. But you know what? Later on in the game, eventually everyone will have a full build. They no longer have the multiple item advantage over you. A single team fight can determine the match, regardless of how behind you were earlier in the game.

The Highest Noon5 votes

I wish that Riot, who's on multiple occassions admitted that their game is frustrating, would stop punishing players who are frustrated by their game. I don't know what they expect when there's a number of players who cannot play this game without insulting everyone forever and at the same time makes the most blatant mistakes. I've lost most of my games today because of players who tilt themselves, tilt the team, tell everyone to kill themselves, using all sorts of hate speech, then proceed to blame everyone when we in fact lose. The other losses were because of selfish players who spend all game split pushing or jungling instead of playing for the victor.

MOLTinaTOR5 votes

I mean, if you're losing that hard that you have to FF, the game won't even last 40 mins lol.

mack91124 votes

I will never surrender because I have come back from the brink of loss so many times EVEN IN SEASON 8

Caretaker Jack5 votes

{quoted}

I will never surrender because I have come back from the brink of loss so many times EVEN IN SEASON 8

I think you need to understand the difference between a game that is bad and one that is unwinnable.

mack91122 votes

[{quoted}](name=Caretaker Jack,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2018-08-12T23:20:16.601+0000)

I think you need to understand the difference between a game that is bad and one that is unwinnable.

Oh I certainly do man and I can tell you a solid 70% of early surrender votes I have seen are easily comebackable just people don't wanna put the energy in and would rather just wanna get into q again so maybe they can get into a one sided stomp in there favour...

MrDrBudd4 votes

This mindset is toxic and is becoming a common trend. Back in the day it was "never give up". Now its "im mad that someone fed so now I wanna give up and they ruined MY game". Quit trying to justify being toxic on the people playing poorly and not catering to you wanting to give up.

Them wanting to play the game out IS NOT worse than your bad attitude and toxic behaviour. It baffles me that you even would imply such a thing.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

This mindset is toxic and is becoming a common trend. Back in the day it was "never give up". Now its "im mad that someone fed so now I wanna give up and they ruined MY game". Quit trying to justify being toxic on the people playing poorly and not catering to you wanting to give up.

Them wanting to play the game out IS NOT worse than your bad attitude and toxic behaviour. It baffles me that you even would imply such a thing.

Its becoming a common trend because ppl are getting fed up with your bullshit. "I ruined your game? Boo hoo, suck it up! I'm having fun so you better stay, make me feel good, and give your all for me or ill report you." Oh, but i'm toxic? Ha. If that mindset isn't toxic then you need a dictionary.

These people are selfish and big headed. They ruined a game and don't have the decency to move on and practice on a clean slate. They'd rather force everyone to feel as shitty as they do for sucking.

Kattzy2 votes

Dude, the difference here is that you both signed up to play a game and you're the one who wants to quit early. Why are you trying to ruin a minimum of 3 other people's games with your bad attitude when they don't want to ff the game you all signed up for? You are startlingly selfish.

Also... why are you so obsessed with winning? Don't get me wrong, I always try my hardest to win, but I don't feel my time is being wasted by playing my favorite game even if I am likely to lose. Just play the game, enjoy, maybe learn something new. You need a serious attitude adjustment.

MrDrBudd2 votes

I mean if you're feeling shitty about having to play a game while losing then you should stop queing up. You putting words in my mouth doesn't make your point true.

you should ask yourself, how is you wanting to quit the game and ff because YOU arent having fun is any less selfish than someone wanting to continue playing it out?

one side is always going to lose. Behind every fed person there is an opposing person who fed them. It happens in the majority of games because the game is snowbally right now. If you cannot handle someone feeding in your game and dont want to play for more than 15-20 mins then I recommend playing the new Nexus Blitz game mode.

Otherwise you can suck it up or eventually end up with ban from being toxic to your teammates because they "ruined your games".

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

I mean if you're feeling shitty about having to play a game while losing then you should stop queing up. You putting words in my mouth doesn't make your point true.

you should ask yourself, how is you wanting to quit the game and ff because YOU arent having fun is any less selfish than someone wanting to continue playing it out?

one side is always going to lose. Behind every fed person there is an opposing person who fed them. It happens in the majority of games because the game is snowbally right now. If you cannot handle someone feeding in your game and dont want to play for more than 15-20 mins then I recommend playing the new Nexus Blitz game mode.

Otherwise you can suck it up or eventually end up with ban from being toxic to your teammates because they "ruined your games".

Whats kind of argument were you hoping to make by assuming I have bad games? In your scenario both people are selfish, but only one of them isn't using the rules to metaphorically hold anyone hostage. Learn what you're arguing against so you can make better points. In the OP, I already said that the person should be able to leave if he doesn't wanna be there.

Knowing when a game is over depends on a lot. Most games aren't hopeless, but this post is designed to talk about the ones that are... So if your whole points are focused on generalizing a topic I, specifically, stated was specific to a specific scenario, then you're going to need a better argument.

MrDrBudd1 votes

Can't argue with a brick wall I guess

hrooza dota 4 votes

normally when ppl dont surr at 15 min while losing hard the game end after 5 min if it take anylonger then that then there was a chance imo

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=hrooza dota ,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=000d,timestamp=2018-08-13T04:08:27.278+0000)

normally when ppl dont surr at 15 min while losing hard the game end after 5 min if it take anylonger then that then there was a chance imo

Yes and No. There are may times where the issue might be that the person is so scared of losing that they don't make any plays to win. So the game can, actually, drag on simply because of a combination of feeding and not knowing how to play.

hrooza dota 2 votes

what that have to do with anything of what i said? if enemy have an advantage because this person doing no play to win and feed then they will win after some time easily. if they dont have advantage at all but your player is playing so safe then you still have a good chance to win. theres no way the game drag unless the enemy dont push but then you get the chance to farm and win.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=hrooza dota ,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=000d00000000,timestamp=2018-08-13T06:05:22.089+0000)

what that have to do with anything of what i said? if enemy have an advantage because this person doing no play to win and feed then they will win after some time easily. if they dont have advantage at all but your player is playing so safe then you still have a good chance to win. theres no way the game drag unless the enemy dont push but then you get the chance to farm and win.

I'm talking about very specific games where as you're generalizing because you didn't read the OP.

I think its funny you're acting like i'm off topic because your initial point is off topic. If you had read the post, you wouldn't have been poking around with hypothetical scenarios, these past 2 posts, because you'd of known the subject.

hrooza dota 2 votes

im talking as a general view and includes you game you talk about and i read the op and all what i saw is you moaning because X or y dont want to surr while playing badly thats it and you did not say any specific games as you said those games are unwinnable and thats it.

you said ppl make you play a game of 40 min but if 40 min is what the game needed to end then the enemy was not winning at all.

if you have anything to say about my post thats off topic then point it out dont cry (you did not read the op!) because clearly im not the only one who misread your op

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=hrooza dota ,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=000d0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-08-14T02:34:10.419+0000)

im talking as a general view and includes you game you talk about and i read the op and all what i saw is you moaning because X or y dont want to surr while playing badly thats it and you did not say any specific games as you said those games are unwinnable and thats it.

you said ppl make you play a game of 40 min but if 40 min is what the game needed to end then the enemy was not winning at all.

if you have anything to say about my post thats off topic then point it out dont cry (you did not read the op!) because clearly im not the only one who misread your op

My OP is not general. This subject is not general. So it makes no sense for you to generalize. Did I make that clear enough for you?

Games depend a lot on the situation. Just because the game dragged onto 40 doesn't mean you could have of won it. If your allies play terribly, you might be good enough stall the game and give them a chance. But that's only on paper and even Communism looks great on paper. See, I actually play the game. My KDA is good and I win more than I lose. I've never been banned and I'm good on honor, but seeing as you didn't bother to understand my argument, i'm not surprised you wouldn't understand me.

I fully understand that, even from behind, the scenario I gave is winnable. BUT I also know that things don't go the way the print claims they do. You can't know if someone is a bad player or just bad at what they're doing through print. For all we know they might just be having a bad game. It's only until you're in the game that you can put the pieces together. If they're terrible enough, then it's very much possible you're stalling the game for nothing. Usually it's not a waste, but in the op I specifically said _"I'm not talking about those games." _

hrooza dota 1 votes

i played games where we had bad allys and we won or almost won post the 30 min mark (or even ppl went afk)

besides even if someone had a bad start they can recover and if they stay bad why the enemy never end? why the game is dragged so long? thats my whole point can you explain on how those subjects of yours drag while the enemy is winning? unless the enemy is dragging the game on propose the game wont drag at all if allys are playing so poorly (and if the enemy is draging then theres a chance to win by spliting/farming)

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=hrooza dota ,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=000d000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-08-15T19:29:52.254+0000)

i played games where we had bad allys and we won or almost won post the 30 min mark (or even ppl went afk)

besides even if someone had a bad start they can recover and if they stay bad why the enemy never end? why the game is dragged so long? thats my whole point can you explain on how those subjects of yours drag while the enemy is winning? unless the enemy is dragging the game on propose the game wont drag at all if allys are playing so poorly (and if the enemy is draging then theres a chance to win by spliting/farming)

If you read the OP you would know I was talking about games that are very few and far between. In that OP, I even made a disclaimer to cover the stall argument so I wouldn't have to hear it from you now.

Your whole point is making a situation I said was uncommon in my op and assuming it's general. Now, if you're assuming every game is winnable then I already discussed that point on the 4th page in depth since nobody seemed to get it before. Till then.

hrooza dota 1 votes

if it is so fucking rare as you claim why make a thread with the title (why im toxic) ... its pretty mis loading tbh

but if theres really anygame where someone make you lose but somehow manage to drag the game till 40 min i would be really surprised if the enemy team was not the one who stalled the game.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=hrooza dota ,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=000d00000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-08-15T19:51:44.447+0000)

if it is so fucking rare as you claim why make a thread with the title (why im toxic) ... its pretty mis loading tbh

but if theres really anygame where someone make you lose but somehow manage to drag the game till 40 min i would be really surprised if the enemy team was not the one who stalled the game.

I admit it's misleading, but it still doesn't change the fact half of you are arguing blind.

hrooza dota 1 votes

everyone become blind when they misload something

The Spicy Crit2 votes

Wow, you aren't downvoted to oblivion. Strange. People on these boards are liberal snowflakes. And yes, you're right, i just don't know why the one that went 0/8 on laning phase ALWAYS HAS TO press "NO" and follow it with a "don't worry, we outscale" and then you play for 40 minutes, having ups and downs and at the and you lose. If you were to flame, by flame i mean to say ANYTHING BAD (excluded phrases like 'kys' and stuff) you will be the bad one and that snowflake that went 0/9 will press a 'report' button and you gonna get banned, meanwhille they will happily feed their next games.

FUCK THIS COMMUNITY'S LOGIC.

Not exaggerating, i think that league has the worst community i've ever seen. Not even minecraft kids are this toxic and snowflaky.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Spicy Crit,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=0011,timestamp=2018-08-13T08:40:06.742+0000)

Wow, you aren't downvoted to oblivion. Strange. People on these boards are liberal snowflakes. And yes, you're right, i just don't know why the one that went 0/8 on laning phase ALWAYS HAS TO press "NO" and follow it with a "don't worry, we outscale" and then you play for 40 minutes, having ups and downs and at the and you lose. If you were to flame, by flame i mean to say ANYTHING BAD (excluded phrases like 'kys' and stuff) you will be the bad one and that snowflake that went 0/9 will press a 'report' button and you gonna get banned, meanwhille they will happily feed their next games.

FUCK THIS COMMUNITY'S LOGIC.

Not exaggerating, i think that league has the worst community i've ever seen. Not even minecraft kids are this toxic and snowflaky.

Hmm, you call me a snowflake and then you agree with all of my points? That's pretty crazy, not gonna lie.

The Spicy Crit2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Caretaker Jack,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=00110000,timestamp=2018-08-13T22:13:02.294+0000)

Hmm, you call me a snowflake and then you agree with all of my points? That's pretty crazy, not gonna lie.

What? Im literally supporting you and calling the people who go 0/9 and complain for being flamed snowflakes. U got something wrong my g

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Spicy Crit,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=001100000000,timestamp=2018-08-14T20:40:23.566+0000)

What? Im literally supporting you and calling the people who go 0/9 and complain for being flamed snowflakes. U got something wrong my g

ok, mb then.

Honeydew Zekling2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Caretaker Jack,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=,timestamp=2018-08-12T21:55:29.920+0000)

Short Version: I hate people who make games unwinnable and then drag you along for 40 minutes.

Long Version:

These people might not even be toxic, but they're far worse than any toxic player in the game. And I wanna be clear, its not because they suck it's because they can't move on. Like, there are bad games you can bounce back from, but i'm not talking about those. I mean the real bad games where these fuckers play so poorly that you don't have a chance without the right comp or 2/5 people doing well enough to carry. I'm talking about those games.

If you're "learning" and you put someone in a game like that, then you shouldn't be so try hard that you're willing to waste 40 minutes of someone else's time to change those low odds (which you caused in the first place.) If that's you, then you don't deserve any more than 15 minutes of that persons time. You have no excuse. If you fucked up early, then you don't need to learn late game, you need to practice early game again and stop dragging your allies through the mud.

If you fail, then do what you can and then accept the loss at 15. How bad is that? You get to play another game and give it another go till you got it down. Its that fucking simple. NA needs to start taking notes from Korea. A region where you need to prove you're worth anything beyond that 15 minute mark or they will _ALL _ go mid. There is no leaver buster over there and computer cafe's $charge$ by the hour. If you're goofing off and having fun at other peoples expense, that's fine. Just be a considerate human being and accept that your "fun" is done at 15... Then you can be someone else's problem.

It really pisses me off that someone can ruin a game and the person that wants to ff is, somehow, the bad guy because he hurt their feelings. Like, really? Weren't you the one who caused the situation? If so, then you're the problem. You don't really deserve a say on who is and isn't toxic. You don't get to talk about your feelings. What you get to do, is stfu and agree to surrender. Otherwise, you're the problem.

I fail to understand the audacity of these people who feel justified in demanding someone else waste their time, beyond 15 minutes, and pour everything they have into that one game that they ruined... Why does that person deserve all this? They didn't put any effort into looking up what they needed or enough into learning from it, but you're supposed to be on your grind and hard carry them? Last I checked, teamwork required everyone to play a part. So, if you want people to stick around, then you should earn it. Its stupid to say that people who put in the effort should be banned because they don't wanna linger longer than 15 in a pointless game.

Dear Riot. make the 15 minute ff the same as the others... Or so fucking help me. -__- (You may down vote now)

I can understand being frustrated and feeling held hostage in a league game. I've had a few games here and there where I'm no longer having fun (usually as ADC when i spend most of my time walking to lane and watching a grey screen) and a few where a group is trolling and just delaying a game.

These types of situations are frustrating! But... while it may be frustrating, you are in charge of how you deal with your emotions.

Me? I usually silently fume or just put up with it until the game is done. I usually stop playing league afterwards because I need a mental break and refresh myself.

If the way you deal with it is to be toxic, that's on you. Nobody else but you. You can feel angry, frustrated, pissed off, etc. because others are not voting to surrender. That's totally fine. But lashing out at them because they won't do what you want (ie. click surrender)? That is not the type of behaviour Riot wants in this game.

To be honest, I used to be toxic as well. Not so much in league chat, but over voicechat with friends. Not to the point of personal attacks, but I'd constantly point out misplays, sigh when my friends made poor plays, or get upset when we were losing badly. People stopped wanting to play with me because of this. I just wasn't fun to play games with. A few years back, someone sat me down an pointed out how I was toxic which really helped me curve me behaviour into something more positive (People like playing with me and I've made a few online friends through league because of it!).

I'd urge you to take a good look at yourself. You don't need to spit your poisonous words at others, no matter how infuriating they are. There are more positive and constructive ways to deal with the emotions. Even AFK'ing instead is a start (still receive a penalty but I'd say it's better than the current approach).

On a different note, your points about changing up the FF system and leavebuster are totally valid and worth exploring. I'm sure these things could be updated to help reduce player frustration and make league a more enjoyable experience.

Kattzy2 votes

Who do you think you are, unilaterally deciding that a game is over when the rest of your team does not want to ff? It's a vote. You do not get all 5 votes. You entered the game that has these rules for ff, and if your team votes to stick it out, suck it up and try until the game is actually over. You don't get to decide for the other 4 people on your team.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

Who do you think you are, unilaterally deciding that a game is over when the rest of your team does not want to ff? It's a vote. You do not get all 5 votes. You entered the game that has these rules for ff, and if your team votes to stick it out, suck it up and try until the game is actually over. You don't get to decide for the other 4 people on your team.

I'm not the control freak here, that would be you... If they want to stay then they can stay, but if others want to leave, then they should be able to. In other words, who do you think YOU are? You don't get to decide who should "stick it out."

You should have fun with your 3v5. Which should be fine because you're not there to win anyways, right? You'll be fine. The game should still be winnable long as the nexus is up.

Elite4Runner2 votes

You started the game to play it. .. Your intention was obviously to win it, and you're frustrated that you THINK it is unwinnable.

It may actually BE unwinnable, and it may not be your fault, .. but by concluding that it is unwinnable grieving your own teammates, and essentially abandoning them because you can't be bothered to continue to try, you become part of the reason.

When games go to 40+ minutes, KDA means less and less, and an ace can cause a massive swing in either direction because death timers are so long.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

You started the game to play it. .. Your intention was obviously to win it, and you're frustrated that you THINK it is unwinnable.

It may actually BE unwinnable, and it may not be your fault, .. but by concluding that it is unwinnable grieving your own teammates, and essentially abandoning them because you can't be bothered to continue to try, you become part of the reason.

When games go to 40+ minutes, KDA means less and less, and an ace can cause a massive swing in either direction because death timers are so long.

Well, Dr. Phil, if you read the OP you would know I was talking about games that are very few and far between. I even made a disclaimer to prevent the very off topic point you're making. But here we are.

I already explain the 40 minute thing, but if you didn't read the OP... It's unlikely you'll read that either. So i'm moving on until you can bring something new to the table.

Elite4Runner2 votes

Just because you already acknowledge where your logic is flawed, it doesn't make it less flawed.

You are still the one who is giving up prematurely because you believe it is over.

My point was, if you continue to play to the best of your ability despite the loss being inevitable, you are not contributing to the loss.

If your team collectively agrees to surrender, then there is no problem. Otherwise, so long as the game is in play, .. play the game.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

Just because you already acknowledge where your logic is flawed, it doesn't make it less flawed.

You are still the one who is giving up prematurely because you believe it is over.

My point was, if you continue to play to the best of your ability despite the loss being inevitable, you are not contributing to the loss.

If your team collectively agrees to surrender, then there is no problem. Otherwise, so long as the game is in play, .. play the game.

Acknowledge what? A misleading title? Dude, you're arguing against a straw man. Like, you're not even talking to me.

The JigSAW2 votes

The easy answer and solution is to make the FF 3 out of 5 at 25 minutes and beyond. I really do not understand how they can say "not a majority" when 60% said yes. Perhaps just apply the lower threshold to blind and draft normal modes at first? Nobody should have to stretch a 20 minute game out 50-55 minutes and then lose stupidly.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

[{quoted}](name=The JigSAW,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=O0q3ZYLr,comment-id=001b,timestamp=2018-08-14T17:14:51.134+0000)

The easy answer and solution is to make the FF 3 out of 5 at 25 minutes and beyond. I really do not understand how they can say "not a majority" when 60% said yes. Perhaps just apply the lower threshold to blind and draft normal modes at first? Nobody should have to stretch a 20 minute game out 50-55 minutes and then lose stupidly.

YES. that would solve it tbh.

HalcyonDweller1 votes

Whoah 28 to 22 on the vote counter, seems this is a controversial topic.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

Whoah 28 to 22 on the vote counter, seems this is a controversial topic.

It is. Nobody wants to waste their time.

HalcyonDweller2 votes

I think there's legitimate reasoning on both sides of the issue. Wasting someone's time is not okay, but taking frustration out on others isn't either.

Caretaker Jack1 votes

{quoted}

I think there's legitimate reasoning on both sides of the issue. Wasting someone's time is not okay, but taking frustration out on others isn't either.

Well of course it's not. You shouldn't rage. (Guess that's my fault for the title tho.) I said I was toxic in the title because of my mindset. Not because I did anything to anyone.

HalcyonDweller1 votes

Oh I see, dont mind me then. Sorry for misunderstanding!

More from Player Behavior

More by Caretaker Jack