Boards›Player Behavior

Genius Implementation Idea

Radiant Wukong·12/3/2018, 10:26:06 AM·3 votes·2,055 views

I present with you the new report option after game. TROLLED: Intentional effort to hinder team's chances to achieve victory. This report will have a required 300 character minimum description to detail the behavior warranting the report.

I present to you the new gameplay feature. REPORT TIMESTAMP This will function the exact same way as pings, except only you will be aware of it. It will highlight a time of 30 seconds prior to ping and 15 seconds after ping as well as highlighting that chat in that window. This way when the person is reviewed, it'll be easier to see their offenses.

03DEC18 0545 CT Update Example for Clarity: It's becoming more and more common for roaming mid-laners like Talon and roaming supports like Bard to take summoner 11 and counter jungle. Some even use it to farm allied camps when the wave is pushed. Former is always ok, but if you're doing the latter without your junglers consent and continue to do so after they inform you not to, then you're trolling. The same person that persists, will also have a smite battle with their own jungler over scuttle crab, then spam ping jungler to stay away from their lane minions.

This is what the extra report option is for. Why? Because that mid laner may have hard carried the game and been positive and chat even though he was being toxic to his teammates. This doesn't fall under griefing.

Note: Before you make assumptions and attack me assuming I'm the victim of these crimes, I never jungle nor do I take smite on my top lane Wukong. Though I have witnessed it in many games and it creates discord in the team with the smite roamer. That cause of discord is toxic and should be punished.

47 Comments

rujitra12/3/2018, 10:35:34 AM4 votes

And how would this be different from the current report feature?

You're taking a Kia, changing the logo on it and the name of it, raising the price 20k, and calling it a Mercedes.

Silly Neeko12/3/2018, 10:33:19 AM3 votes

[deleted]

Kei14312/3/2018, 10:34:33 AM2 votes

That would certainly make manual reviews a little easier and take less time, so the backlog will be less.

The main problem still lies with how the system is so not visible, that people don't know it's working.

Bettnachleger12/3/2018, 10:29:58 AM1 votes

And who is reviewing all this stuff?

ModJikker12/3/2018, 3:21:18 PM1 votes

Hey guys,

Let's keep the conversation civil in here and avoid bringing in topics such as race or political opinions. I've done a bit of editing to clean things up. It's fine to debate the idea presented in this thread, but when we start to go into problematic topics or insults, then it's starts violating the Board Universal Rules.

If anyone has questions, feel free to stop by the Moderation Discord or post on Discuss the Boards.

Thanks

[poppy-wink]

Modi12/3/2018, 3:47:25 PM1 votes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_delayed_is_justice_denied

The slower a system is, the less justice it serves. Waiting to punish a toxic player after making several, if not many, games unpleasant serves no justice. Just because game play behavioral issues are punished more slowly than chat-related issues, does not mean we should slow down chat punishments. It means that we need to find ways to speed up game play issues.

While the Tribunal could increase the speed of punishment, in practice it was far too slow. The other problem with the Tribunal, is that there was no way to actually watch a game, to detect game play behavior issues. The tribunal almost exclusively focused on chat-related issues.

There is also another fact: the Tribunal did not reduce the workload on Rioters. Employees at Riot still reviewed nearly every single result that came out of the Tribunal. Adding a Tribunal in front of Rioter review of games just slows down the process, by adding another review barrier.