Response Topic :: Dominick Destine
I'm actually enjoying this discussion and wish for it to continue. I have my second job (away from a computer) soon, but I would like for this to persist. This is the last post by Dominick, not mine. I'm responding in kind in a below post.
> Yet, you're dedicating the time and effort to write it out.
What's your point? one would need to literally "go out of their way" to not be at their keyboard while being on their computer.
> It's okay to think that people are scum of the earth and shouldn't be playing the game.
And who decides what the criteria for "scum of the earth" is?
I have very specific criteria for it but I am sure that the authority here does not agree.
> further spiral negatively in that person's experience.
Once again, nonsense.
"Hurt Feelings" is not an argument.
> I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic there, but there has definitely been improvement.
Nope. I follow the rules 100% of the time.
Except in rare cases where it is a failing of mine that is unintentional (Rule change for ex).
> To be perfectly honest, I follow most of what you're saying. Authority should let the society deal with societal issues unless they directly infringe on the rights of the person.
Something like that.
Basically it is the intelligent man's/libertarian stance which is diametrically opposed to feminism/leftism that advocates for 1984 style thought control, thought policing , violation of basic human rights, censorship, erosion of liberty of expression, newspeak, etc.
> Riot prescribes to a different philosophy
Of course and I specifically stated that.
Riot is leftist/feminist leaning... that's fine, although I disagree with their stance I still support them 100% of the way.
> we should look at what benefits our experiences
"Experiences" is meaningless.
> and our ability to win the game.
Which is determined by something called Skill, not by "Words".
> Talking trash and playful banter is one thing, but attacking a person's decision-making is not conducive toward getting to that goal of victory.
Who cares.
"Hurt Feelings" is not an argument (Once again reiterating; I never violate Riot's rules). Play League of Legends, not the "Who is more offended" game.
> more tactical like a chess player.
... have you ever played Chess?
Emotions cloud one's judgment and the tactical ability of chess players is greatly derived specifically from not being "offended" but rather focusing entirely on the game which is exactly what libertarian/intelligent men always advocate.
"Words" are irrelevant. Skill is what matters. Karpov took this stance and he was the greatest of his time. Kasparov was a diva but even he also pushed it.
> You can have both scenarios.
No you cannot. Either liberty is the core or it is not. If "Hurt Feelings" becomes an argument, then there are no valid arguments after that point because "I am 1% more offended than you" is the greatest argument of all time with no possible refutation.
> beneficial to your experience.
"Experience" is meaningless.
> Yes, survival of the fittest as you stated earlier is more raw and based on individual talent
That is correct and, in my opinion, the only method worth pursuing.
> but make it about the game, not about the words people may speak.
That's exactly my point.
> Don't devolve the game into a fight over team chat
Who cares.... "Hurt Feelings" is not an argument. How many times must I remind you of this?
> I could personally care less if people call me scum of the earth or wishing my family would drop dead.
Then you would be against the draconian system which you are not. You seem to be in full support of the ultra authoritarian/leftist/feminist stance... I support it but only because I support Riot, I am strongly libertarian leaning, survival of the fittest, meritocracy, etc.
"Feelz before reelz" is not something I can co-sign.
> What I do care about is the mental states of my current allies and my future allies; if their mental states are healthier and better, then I stand
Irrelevant.
Skill is what matters, not "Emotions". Skill is absolute. The skilled will triumph, the skill-less that cannot hack it will (once again) fall into a long slumber down in the bronze brackets. There is nothing else.
Skill 100%.
Though in a way, the collectivist leftist arguments you make have some merit.... I consider myself to be mechanically superior than 99% of the player base, but I strongly dislike the fact that it is a team game and I am forced to rely on others.
So I tend to do my own thing which makes it difficult to win. Regardless of this I will make my way to Diamond through skill alone, everything else is irrelevant and does not matter. The childish notions that "Feelings" are relevant have no place in a competitive arena... and so on and so forth.
In any case, I believe we are at an impasse but it doesn't matter, Riot ultimately sides with you and thus, I have lost this one by default before it even began, gg.