Just played a game where a person intentionally played a proven bad champion, specifically because they only played female champions and they had 2 rr but didn't spend them. I'm not against players playing off meta, but if that is your reason as to why...
Also I get that URF is meant to be a fun game-mode. I am more asking about this kind of thing as a general question.
ment to be a fun game mode. Player plays for fun other players want them reported for playing for fun.
Sounds about right for league.
Inting is not just about intentionally doing something that ends up lowering your team's chance to win (otherwise literally everything with a negative effect could be considered inting). It's about doing something with the specific intention of lowering your team's chance to win.
So... did that player play the champion because it is bad? According to you, the answer to that is no.
I would also love to know what you consider a "proven bad champion" in this context.
Intentionally played a bad champion in URF? Are you serious?
Just played a game where a person intentionally played a proven bad champion, specifically because they only played female champions and they had 2 rr but didn't spend them. I'm not against players playing off meta, but if that is your reason as to why...
Then you need to get over it. Other people picking a champion you don't like is not inting. We get that you are intensely against off meta picks, but that is not at all reasonable idea to come to.
If that person ended up carrying the game, would you still be asking this same question?
no
No lol. Riot aint gonna ban their players for playing things as intended that were implemented into the game. If a champ is "proven bad" then thats on Riot to balance it, not on us as players to do the research and find the proof that they're bad and in turn not play it.
Which champ was it, OP?
