Riot Games: Please recognize and disavow hate speech on the basis of disability.

Tyrëll··9 votes·745 views

For context, I am autistic. I am one of MANY autistic people who play this game. I am writing today about a discrepancy I have noticed with how rules on hate speech are enforced in regards to hate speech and slurs for disability.

As should be plain to everyone, Riot is very explicit about slurs not being tolerated, even when used in an "I'm just playing" context. Use them in your games and you will probably get at least a chat ban. If an LCS pro were to go on stream today and drop the N-word or call their teammate a homophobic epithet, Riot would have something to say about that. Heck, one pro player in particular can't even use his old subscription catchphrase anymore (you know who I mean by this, and yes, I don't feel that it was a problem either, but that's not my call). Clearly, there are well defined rules on this matter.

The problem here is that when the problem speech is discriminatory on the basis of disability, the rules are not nearly as strongly enforced. The use of the word "retard" is quite common. So is "autistic" being used to refer to something a player doesn't like, or "downs" being used as an insult. For those of you who are not aware of the significance of the word to disabled people, "retard" is considered the N-word equivalent for disabled people. What players fail to recognize is that there are, in fact, autistic people and people with Down Syndrome playing this game, and quite successfully, I might add. We have the same right to play the game as any other player. We also are not keen on having players toss around these particular words. There are lots of words out there to use during times of frustration if you must do so, and I'm probably not the only one wondering why people need to use "retard" so badly. I personally have had that word used at me in the totally serious context, in the real world. There are people playing this game who have had that word used at them to mock very real disabilities. There are people playing this game who have experienced this word as a means of discrimination, not simply a joke. This word hurts people just as badly as the N-word.

Also note that when you call someone "autistic" as a means of insult, you are implying that there is something wrong with being autistic, and that autistic people shouldn't be playing the game. I am certainly allowed to be autistic and play the game. You might think "it's just a joke", but it's so much more than that to people that have experienced discrimination. That's why Riot has rules against hate speech in the first place, because they want people who experience real life discrimination to be able to have fun playing the game.

Often times when I see it happen in my games, I will tell them "hey, that's not cool to use, there are disabled people playing this game." I'll probably mute them too, but me muting them doesn't make it not a problem anymore. Riot NEEDS to make it clear that using the word "retard" is equally in poor taste as using the N-word, along with calling people "autistic" and "downs". For example, I noticed that the board rules don't explicitly prohibit hate speech on the basis of disability. It is my opinion that disabled people deserve the same level of hate speech protections as any other group Riot disallows hate speech for. I would like to request that Riot broaden their hate speech definitions to include hate speech on the basis of disability, and enforce those rules to the same degree as other hate speech is enforced.

An additional problem I see with the rule enforcement is this: LCS pros are expected to uphold a certain standard of behavior on stream and on social media by Riot. This includes expecting that these players not casually drop the N-word or things to that effect. We certainly saw Riot actively enforcing this during MSI. However, every single LCS pro (but one) whose stream I've watched has repeatedly used "retarded" or "autistic" on stream. That tells me that Riot doesn't see a problem with the usage of these words. Since LCS pros are held to a higher standard of behavior than the average player, if they are allowed to use "retard" whenever they want, the average player isn't going to see a problem either. To be clear, I don't blame pro players or think they are intentionally trying to degrade disabled people, I simply believe that they just aren't aware and that Riot has a role in making them aware.

To conclude my appeal (and congrats on reading this whole thing, by the way), I call upon Riot to officially recognize "retard" and inappropriate uses of "autistic" and "downs" as hate speech, and enforce the rules equally in regards to this matter, including with LCS pros.

tl;dr: Riot should officially declare "retard" and certain uses of "autistic" and "downs" as hate speech and enforce the hate speech rules equally.

19 Comments

Lauchmelder5 votes

Not everything insulting is hate speech.

sheldonbunny3 votes

[{quoted}](name=MadKnife IV,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=E5G130Q4,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-06-19T11:51:47.923+0000)

Not everything insulting is hate speech.

Discriminating against a certain group of individuals can be though, which I believe was OP's point.

Lauchmelder3 votes

I actually don't see how those words are discriminating.

Offensive yes, but considering the majority of players won't know if someone actually is "retarded" (it's a medical term) or an autist they aren't using it to discriminate others. They just want to be an ass.

Damagefox2 votes

actions have consequences. So yeah, they want to be an ass on a team game. Good for them. Still think they should be punished for it.. People come onto this game to play a team game, not be told how much of a "trash retard" you are because someone wants to score internet points. "oooh how edgy am I?"

He can be an ass, but if thats the case why should we be forced to play with him..Oh wait, we have to or else we get hit with leaverbuster, potentially banned.

Lauchmelder1 votes

Hey, cool down.

I've never said that I agree with being toxic nor did I say that they shouldn't get punished.

All I was saying is that the word "hatespeech" is used for every minor insult lately, it has lost it's meaning.

EvilDustMan2 votes

[{quoted}](name=MadKnife IV,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=E5G130Q4,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2017-06-19T12:25:43.146+0000)

I actually don't see how those words are discriminating.

Offensive yes, but considering the majority of players won't know if someone actually is "retarded" (it's a medical term) or an autist they aren't using it to discriminate others. They just want to be an ass.

It's the same as using "gay" as an insult.

Lauchmelder2 votes

It's offensive if you want, yes.

But it's definitely not discriminating the person or even hate-speech.

Mecha MaIphite2 votes

(it's a medical term)

The meaning of words isn't just in their definition, it's also affected by their connotation and how people use them informally. The word "retardation" was used to replace other words like "idiocy" because those had become insults, and is now currently being replaced for the same reason.

Lauchmelder2 votes

Yes, but you missed the point.

Unless I know the OP has a medical condition it's not discriminating. It's just being an ass by throwing insults all over the place.

Concerning my OP: I think that racism, islamophobia, homophobia and the likes are hate speech.

Insults like "retard", "Fa**ot" or "autist" are rude, negative behavior but don't fall under hate-speech.

Mecha MaIphite2 votes

Hate speech is targeted against specific groups, which includes people with disabilities and different sexual orientations. It also shouldn't matter what context it's used in; using a term for a group as an insult implies that there is something inherently wrong with belonging to that group.

Lauchmelder1 votes

But if I don't know if that person belongs to a group it's a personal insult and therefor not hate speech. I don't target the entire group but the person him/herself.

Mecha MaIphite5 votes

When you say something like "you're autistic" to insult someone, just the fact that you used the word implies that you think that there is something so fundamentally wrong with being autistic that it's horrible to call someone that. Even if you aren't trying to insult autistic people, you are inadvertently doing so by normalizing "autistic" as an insult.

Lauchmelder1 votes

Well, let's just stop there.

I deem anything negative report worthy. So there's no need to really fight about terminology.

With that: You win.

TrulyBland2 votes

Thank you for making a point I found difficult to put in words. That said, this very explanation also explains why I personally wouldn't deem all kind of insults based on disability to be hate speech or discriminatory.

As an extreme example, if I used "half brained" or something along those lines as an insult, then that is obviously incredibly insensitive. But even the sister of a good friend of mine, who literally has only half a working brain, would probably agree that there very much is something fundamentally wrong about only having half a brain and would most likely prefer having a full brain herself.

I will admit, though, that generally with any sorts of mental conditions the lines get very blurry, as the effect they have on the personality as a whole cannot be really properly assessed, and as such it isn't really possible to say whether autism for example is an inherently bad thing.

Tyrëll3 votes

The push to have autism recognized as "not inherently bad" is a newer movement. I would like to think I have the right to be alive and also autistic. I wouldn't be me without autism. That is why I came here, because people haven't been made aware of this yet. Autistic people don't necessarily want to be cured.

"retard" specifically is pretty bad because it's the n-word equivalent and no longer used as a medical term by most places.

Tyrëll2 votes

[{quoted}](name=MadKnife IV,realm=EUW,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=E5G130Q4,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2017-06-19T12:25:43.146+0000)

I actually don't see how those words are discriminating.

Offensive yes, but considering the majority of players won't know if someone actually is "retarded" (it's a medical term) or an autist they aren't using it to discriminate others. They just want to be an ass.

Riot doesn't allow you to call someone the N-word at all. But hey, you don't know if the other player is actually black, so it's just an insult, right? /s

Damagefox3 votes

I had a recent match where our jungler (Nidalee) spent the entire game flaming and degrading the team. near the end the insult was rather disgusting "Nidalee: Did you all get your vaccines recently, you play like you have autism" "Me: I actually DO have autism" "Nidalee: Good" "Nidalee: Kill yourself"

But hey, the defenders will say not to be so "sensitive" when a player says to kill yourself for having a particular disability.

Tyrëll2 votes

Yeah I'm getting real tired of that noise. I do have the right to be alive and autistic.

EvilDustMan1 votes

Uh, no, it totally is.

More from Player Behavior