Boards›Player Behavior

About player behaviour

gamblerforlife·11/16/2015, 6:03:38 PM·2 votes·608 views

I will make this short.I don;t agree with Riot policy to permaban people for their ingame chat.The reason is simple:it;s not because they don;t deserve it,it's because it implies that other offences are not punished as hard.Trolls,intentional feeders..if you meet someone like that,they won;t get banned.They won;t get banned even after a few games.Hell,i have a friend that trolled all his way from high diamond to plat(30 games loss streak)and he is still playing.Meanwhile if i say something offensive in a game ,you might get banned from 1 game:). Is this fair? they should get perma mute and this will solve the problem of high toxicity,will it not?

I had the pleasure to meet certain individuals that tries to tilt you ingame,simply to ban you:|..wow

This is why i don;t agree with hard punishments towards toxic people.Because it should imply that harsher "crimes" should get even worse punishments.Which is not the case,since you can get permabanned from toxicity.I don;t whant to have harsh punishments from talking in chat.Why?Because the system it's automated in most cases and it's a behaviour matter.It should be handled by humans. Also,why implement such a tough system,when you can simply reward the good players.This way the bad players will whant to reform in order to get some sort of rewards:).honey management.Not hard to do.

thx for reading

For those interested i was not banned and still have my rewards;)

7 Comments

Sky of Smiles11/16/2015, 6:13:05 PM3 votes

Needs more bans indeed.

ThePartyLeader11/16/2015, 6:13:13 PM3 votes

Let's say you are in a community park playing chess with some people. You start losing and you knock all the pieces on the ground and ruin the game. No cop will come arrest you. Now let's say same situation but now instead of knocking the peices off the board you stand up flip him off, tell him to commit suicide and that your going to sneak into his house and give his family cancer. Then sit down at a different table and ask the next guy to play chess.

Now I agree rito needs to continue to improve detection on intentional feeding and probably increase punishment on those sorts of things, but verbal abuse is a whole different thing that actually leads to emotional and physical harm of humans every day.

Zielmann11/16/2015, 6:14:37 PM3 votes

It's not that in-chat toxicity is more or less severe in a single instance, it's that these players are consistently doing it, even after several warnings that their behavior isn't acceptable. If they have no intention to fix their behavior, why should they be allowed to keep playing?

I also don't really see permanent chat restrictions as helping much. These players are out to get a response from allies in-game. if they can't do it via chat, they're going to find other ways to do it.

gamblerforlife11/16/2015, 6:25:28 PM2 votes

As long as toxicity get you banned from 1 few games and intentional feeders,trolls can get away with 30 games atleast of doing it.I think it;s safe to assume that toxicity is consider the higher threat here. And this is not fair to be honest.Last year i had a bad game,where i was chat restricted for 75 games.I did not use insults of any means.I was just arguing with someone(a player that trolled my last game and this game was doing this stuff again trying to tilt)it was not a long conversation,had only 10-15 posts.And i get 75 CR..and this guy most likely didn;t receive any sort of punishment. Basicly i am branded as toxic right?which i am not So,if you talk bad in a game and someone trolls that game.the one that get the higher punishment is the trash talker.is it fair?

SmokedAlmonds11/16/2015, 7:50:53 PM1 votes

Chat infractions get punished faster because it is much easier to detect. It does not imply that it is worse than other things. That is something you incorrectly inferred. Think of it like 1 guy robing a store that has a camera and another guy robing a store without a camera. They use the footage to find the first guy but the 2nd guy gets away.

What to focus on is more of a matter of where resources can be the most effective, not just what is the worst offense.

Trolling will likely always be under-detected. Most trolling is doing things that are sometimes ok, but just in the wrong situation. There is simply no easy way to identify that.