TIL: Inting is not inting if you (accidentally or not) do something in the match

Chimpanzzi··2 votes·3,017 views

So, I got a 0 mastery Singed in my team. There were some events in the champion select that led to this (mainly him being autofilled into a role he didn't pick and nobody wanting to flex for him) but we were optimistic. Surely it can't be that bad? If he would feed intentionally, he would get punished, right?

https://prnt.sc/mp092w https://prnt.sc/mp09et

The guy got a couple assists by diving headfirst into the enemy team which caused us to follow him and get us a couple kills. However, this was nowhere near enough to stop a 10/2 Yasuo and a 7/3 Lucian.

We reported him, of course. He didn't get punished. This might be because he did some damage before inevitably dying, and got some farm while "proxying" in the enemy base.

I was the support of the losing team in this game. Huge thanks to the three other players who managed to keep a positive attitude even though the loss was almost certain.

16 Comments

Voldymort3 votes

Im curious why you're only showing the singed stats and not everyone else's

Got something to hide?

Chimpanzzi2 votes
Voldymort1 votes

the op.gg would be more useful. stats aren't everything

Chimpanzzi1 votes

[deleted]

GreenKnight1 votes

{quoted}

honestly should just replace the previous links with this

He just provoked you to break the naming and shaming rule.

Edit: Since OP changed his post, i edited mine too.

Voldymort1 votes

technically, the naming and shaming rule would not have been broken if he simply linked his own op.gg, instead of singed's

GreenKnight2 votes

{quoted}

technically, the naming and shaming rule would not have been broken if he simply linked his own op.gg, instead of singed's

Maybe. But mods recently have no idea what to do with their own rules, so...

Jennifer4204 votes

the nameshame rule is total garbage anyways. hey guys i had a inter in my game. my history is public you all can see who im talking about by just clicking on my name and then on history. BUT IM NOT ALLOWED TO GIVE OUT HIS NAME!!!

its so stupid.

Syrile1 votes

{quoted}

the nameshame rule is total garbage anyways. hey guys i had a inter in my game. my history is public you all can see who im talking about by just clicking on my name and then on history. BUT IM NOT ALLOWED TO GIVE OUT HIS NAME!!!

its so stupid.

It goes with the mentality that is covering the modern day...

fatherdarius2 votes

I mean, he's playing singed.

His goal is to run behind enemy lines and cause confusion, right?

Or is that only on ARAM?

Chimpanzzi1 votes

I mean, playing Singed is not an excuse to go 0/20?

HavokDash2 votes

It is if: A) Team is too self-centered to actually try and HELP him.

or B) the enemy team is smart enough to know to FOCUS him. Thus keeping him in respawn.

Alot of the season 9 players are Snowflakes who are only concerned with "bubble-wrapping" thier kda. Their team doesnt even register to them unless they want someone to throw under the bus. This season its getting to where EVERYTHING is inting. Had a game where a jungler Ignored the enemy kha-zix, let him free roam. Then started claiming the players were "inting" when the enemy Kha got fed to the point they could 1-shot us instantly. And what did our jungler do? Nothing, just resorted to calling for reports on players for "inting"

So I ignore claims of "inting" because these players are too self-centered and snowflake-oriented to actually think, they just call everything "inting" and wash thier hands of it like its some sort of catch-all label.

Chimpanzzi1 votes

That's 20 deaths, for God's sake. 20 deaths. Without communication and without any reason whatsoever. It doesn't fit A and it certainly doesn't fit B. It's a Singed.

Jo0o1 votes

Int feeding often takes a manual review to turn into a ban, which takes time due to the backlog of inting reports they're handling.

Chimpanzzi1 votes

Could be. After reviewing the boards rules, I also found out that not all punishments hand out the "thank you for reporting" message. Or so the legend says.

Infernape1 votes

Then again when it comes to banning for inting, the first punishment is a 14 day ban and is obvious to notice if someone's been punished or not (as they stop playing games suddenly).

More from Player Behavior

More by Chimpanzzi