(Follow up 2) So Tantram leaves one irrelevant comment and that's it, case closed?

Beg my pardon if the title comes out rude, but I'm honestly sick of this.

First the mandatory background explanation though:

1. I was punished earlier for trying to defend a rather innocent victim who was being verbally harassed by his teammates and even one of my teammates too.
2. Later Riot support confirmed that the punishment was correct and apparently I "spammed" too much.
3. After the thread blew up, Riot Tantram left a comment that honestly doesn't answer anything relating the actual issue, and never answered any further comments again.

So, let's tackle into the Tantram's comment, and how it relates to the whole issue and the two other threads:

> I'd have given you a chat restriction if I was hand reviewing this case (which is what the system gave you). > > The top laner said 'open top' and gives up on the team, which is not ok. Then they say to report top for giving up. Even if they got their attitude together and continued to play, of course a statement like that is going to tilt the team. Then you go on a tirade of chat (64 lines in game) .. and 42 lines in post-game where you stick around to call them morons and wish bans upon them. > > Arguing with teammates is not the purpose of chat. I would have muted you after a few comments. It would have been impossible to coordinate with the team over your chatter.

There's quite a lot of discussion about it already on the previous thread, but here are some of the things I'd like to focus on. Please read them all to get a general idea, don't just reply on the first two or three.

1. He still doesn't answer why he would've given me a chat restriction, as someone points out in the replies, the sentence should continue: "I'd have given you a chat restriction if I was hand reviewing this case, BECAUSE...". Maybe it's because of the after game lobby that he would've punished me, but more on that in point #6.
2. He mentions the enemy top laner (Darius) saying "open top" and hints at it being good enough reason for his team to tilt. Yet he completely ignores the fact that his team was not helping Darius even when I was taking his second tier turret, does that not justify Darius tilting too then?
3. The Darius never even actually opened top (other than backing off from turret or I'd dive him), he kept up in farm and did his best to not feed me more. I know this is a little far fetched, but as far as any of us are concerned, it might have been his tactic to fool me into thinking he's not trying, so he can surprise me.
4. How is the top laner's words related to my punishment or the support team saying I was punished for talking too much?
5. He talks about me "going on a tirade of chat", a total of 106 lines of text during the game and post-game lobby. I know that's a lot, but I'm a very fast typist on a keyboard, and even if I wasn't, since when is talking a lot against the summoner's code? It would be a different thing if I afked while typing, but 99% of my typing was done during rotations, farming, etc. Like I said I'm a fast typist, I don't need to sit afk in base to type.
6. He says that I called the enemies morons in the post-game lobby. This is likely true. However, it is completely irrelevant and just a decoy to de-escalate the actual thread. Riot support team never mentioned this in their original reply, they further investigated my punishment and came into the conclusion that the punishment was correct for the reason of me spamming the in-game chat. Whether I was toxic after the game or not doesn't affect the fact that support team didn't take that into account, yet handed out the punishment. This is the issue I was originally trying to tackle. I do not care for my personal punishment, it was merely a 10 game chat restriction, but I do care for the Riot's apparent policy that defending a victim by "talking a lot" is considered a bannable offense.
7. He says that he would've muted me after a few comments. And he is free to do so, as is anyone else. But that doesn't mean it should be punishable to talk a lot, as long as there's nothing breaking the summoner's code I should be allowed to talk. I wasn't spamming, I was arguing, and relatively politely may I add.
8. He says it would've been "impossible" to coordinate with the team over my chatter. Someone calculated that I said about one message every 30 seconds, I find it hard to believe that clutters the chat so much that it's impossible to coordinate. Not to mention there are pings that further assist coordinating. And hadn't he already muted me anyways?

And now I want you to forget all 8 points I just made. They're all irrelevant. Those are the minor flaws I was able to come up with by analysing his comment. The major flaws are what you don't see from the comment. The real flaws is what he is ignoring. He never tackled either of the main points of my threads:

1. It seems to be Riot's stand that you should not stand up for the victims of verbal abuse to show them that they're not alone, not even if you do it rather politely, but instead you should close your eyes and let them be bullied.
2. You can get banned for talking a lot even if you never break the summoner's code.

He may have shown I flamed someone. He may have let me know that he would've muted me. But he never tackled the real issue. Riot's policy on the issue is absolute madness. And if a further investigation of my comments concluded that talking a lot should be punished, then the system is straight out broken too. And now I'm even more baffled, their way of handling this thing seems to be "leave one comment that defames him as a flamer, and people will forget all the points he's made". This is absurd. There are literally hundreds of comments of people saying that they agree with me that you are supposed to stand up for the weak and the victims of cyber bullying, and now it's all discredited by saying "oh but he flamed someone once". That's not how this works. We want answers.