Boards›Player Behavior

Can't Ban Toxicity

Doc Strange·8/18/2018, 4:48:03 PM·2 votes·1,766 views

I see threads talking about trying to ban all forms of toxicity, and its a very illogical thing to do.

It wouldn't make sense at all, I'm not with toxicity but chances are that everyone has been salty during their games.

It wouldn't actually work either, The AI in the report system is flawed to only capture certain words and leave out others.( Experience Players who have been banned know how to flame without getting caught.) This would have to be a job for an riot employee and too many reports are going through and so that leaves out this option.

Atleast 75% Of all players would probably get banned in NA since its the most toxic region in LoL.

Think of something else you edgelords and don't boycott this game, its the players fault in this kind of category

21 Comments

Imperial Pandaa8/18/2018, 4:54:29 PM12 votes

I feel like you have zero idea how the IFS functions.

The only word list would be the zero tolerance phrases. Everything else works with a Machine Learning set up.

EvilDustMan8/18/2018, 4:56:11 PM4 votes

5% was the punishment rate they last cited, with .006% ban rate for toxicity

Shukr4n8/18/2018, 5:03:39 PM3 votes

Ibelieve that if that 75% community could be.banned and.never come back, community itseld would regain that missing players fast since lol would be known as having non toxic community.

Win win

Eleshakai8/18/2018, 6:36:29 PM2 votes

There's a difference between 'upset' and 'toxic'. The fact that you can't recognize this is why you feel it wouldn't work.

Zombie Gerbil8/18/2018, 8:12:32 PM1 votes

Another individual who doesn't know squat about the IFS. Not surprising.