Skip to content

Should one feel good about getting others punished?

MustardTigerMK··7 votes·6,239 views

yes or no?..

within the last five days I've gotten two messages saying that I assisted in getting someone punished. This most recent message actually brought me the type of joy I might get from a reward. Strange to feel good about knowing someone got punished, who who we to judge? All I know is there shouldn't be a system that brings people joy when others get punished it creates a want to punish people and that is TOXIC!

48 Comments

Hotarµ3 votes

There's nothing wrong with reporting someone who's being a jerk (or breaking the rules in general) and feeling joy when they receive their just desserts. :p

It's not really toxic, it shows that the system is working and rulebreakers are being punished.

MustardTigerMK3 votes

Of course there shouldn't be any quilt bestowed upon me for feeling joy.

Do you agree with a system that rewards players with joy at the expense of other players misery?

A hungry horse would give a lot for a carrot, imagine what a rabbit would do for a field full of cabbage.....

Hotarµ6 votes

It would be different if the people being punished didn't do anything wrong, but they're actively breaking the rules. I understand what you're trying to say, that we shouldn't take solace in the fact that others are suffering, but these people usually troll or berate others for no reason.

There's nothing wrong with relishing in a little karmic justice.

Edit: Not really sure why I got downvoted. I assume it's because someone took it the wrong way. I'm not saying you should pine over the message and feel like a god, letting the power trip go to your head or anything. I'm simply saying that if someone gave you a hard time, there's nothing wrong with feeling a little relief or joy that they've been punished for their actions. :p

MustardTigerMK2 votes

You're missing the point good sir.

Why does a player need to know that his/her/their report got someone punished?

I move to re-move the notification that tells you your report punished someone, what purpose does it serve? Consensus is it serves up plenty of joy off the back of others misery.

Hotarµ3 votes

Because even if you may dislike it, others take solace in the fact that the people who have wronged them got bit by karma. Also, it shows that the report system takes action against rulebreakers.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

Because even if you may dislike it, others take solace in the fact that the people who have wronged them got bit by karma. Also, it shows that the report system takes action against rulebreakers.

It's like people purposely ignore points I try to make.

We agree reporting and seeing someone punished brings joy, like a loot capsule brings me joy and we've established that's okay... you even went sadistic and seem to be uncomfortably okay with it.

My point is that riot shouldn't reward people for getting others banned because it creates incentive to report which is wrong. Forget the morality of reporting or the fact that people deserve the punishment, riot should remove the notification as nobody needs to know about people getting punished.

Sirsir2 votes

Because people complained that they didn't know if anything was actually happening to improve the quality of their games, so they give feedback. Its not 'Look what you did', it's 'see, we ARE listening'

Vreivai1 votes

You're getting downvoted because of the way it's implied that you view those who have been punished. It appears from your post that you view them as the throwaways of the community, players we should just get rid of rather than make any attempt to reform.

Hotarµ1 votes

I don't think that to be the case and my post history supports that.

Also, yeah. I think that is a fair way to look at it even though that's not my perspective on the matter. These people broke rules and don't deserve to be welcomed back into the community without a little bit of effort and reformation.

ZackTheWaffleMan1 votes

{quoted}

Of course there shouldn't be any quilt bestowed upon me for feeling joy.

why not? quilts are great

MustardTigerMK1 votes

they suck that's why

Eedat3 votes

Not sure why this is getting downvoted. This is a pretty classic debate around corrections vs punishment or an eye for an eye. Essentially it boils down to you hurt me so I want to see you get hurt. It's pretty obvious looking at history that the majority of humans prefer seeing people punished rather than attempting to correct the problem. So I wouldn't feel too bad about it.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

Not sure why this is getting downvoted. This is a pretty classic debate around corrections vs punishment or an eye for an eye. Essentially it boils down to you hurt me so I want to see you get hurt. It's pretty obvious looking at history that the majority of humans prefer seeing people punished rather than attempting to correct the problem. So I wouldn't feel too bad about it.

I love lamp brother, I love lamp!

Madjack011 votes

{quoted}

Not sure why this is getting downvoted. This is a pretty classic debate around corrections vs punishment or an eye for an eye. Essentially it boils down to you hurt me so I want to see you get hurt. It's pretty obvious looking at history that the majority of humans prefer seeing people punished rather than attempting to correct the problem. So I wouldn't feel too bad about it.

Not sure how things are in NA, but according to my own research (which was certified by a belgian university) on the matter in Belgium it is actually more common now to opt for correctional punishments over hard punishments for minor to medium offenses.

Fun fact, the more people know the context of the offender, the less are they inclined to opt for a hard punishment. It is shown that the level of education also plays a significant role where higher educated people are less punitive in general. That ties in with the use of low quality media, where people who often frequent gossip tabloids are also more punitive. Funnily enough recent victimisation has not shown to be a significant variable.

There is a whole lot more that comes into it but it's been a while since I conducted that research and I would have to dig it up again for more info.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

Not sure how things are in NA, but according to my own research (which was certified by a belgian university) on the matter in Belgium it is actually more common now to opt for correctional punishments over hard punishments for minor to medium offenses.

Fun fact, the more people know the context of the offender, the less are they inclined to opt for a hard punishment. It is shown that the level of education also plays a significant role where higher educated people are less punitive in general. That ties in with the use of low quality media, where people who often frequent gossip tabloids are also more punitive. Funnily enough recent victimisation has not shown to be a significant variable.

There is a whole lot more that comes into it but it's been a while since I conducted that research and I would have to dig it up again for more info.

Riots punishment system completely eliminates context which is interesting considering it is linked to sympathy or understanding when issuing punishments. Nobody is on board to allow context to come into play when punishing people here.

Madjack011 votes

{quoted}

Riots punishment system completely eliminates context which is interesting considering it is linked to sympathy or understanding when issuing punishments. Nobody is on board to allow context to come into play when punishing people here.

That is indeed an issue worth thinking about. I believe though that the notion of not allowing context to be an influencing variable, comes from the idea that people's personal issues and emotions that are negatively perceived by others, should stay out of the game because they hinder the prime objective of the game: to have fun. And that with the majority in mind.

It is true though that a lot of boards members are very fond of the idea of personal responsibility. I can't tell if this is the best approach or not. But given that this is just a game it seems a viable one to me. There is also a calculation of unwanted behaviour here. People want you to focus on yourself with the sentiment that you hold all the cards to improve yourself. Blaming context can be seen as an excuse (whether justified or not). Either way there is no ideal solution where everyone gets treated justly. Some people will always have to pay the price for that.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

I wouldn't say excuses should be allowed however context like the general game environment should be considered. I've been punished for games where EVERYONE on the team and even people from the other team were toxic and joking the whole game, I got punished for very mild toxicity in comparison to the environment I was put in.

So in situations where let's say 3 people or 60% of your team is toxic how is it fair that when those 3 people get reported that context gets completely taken out of the equation? It's not someone just being toxic for no reason, it's three people arguing....how can you fault someone for defending themselves from hateful chat?

Vreivai1 votes

I think a large part of why the system doesn't allow context is that it's very hard to design an algorithm that can take context into account.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

I think a large part of why the system doesn't allow context is that it's very hard to design an algorithm that can take context into account.

I talked to a blitzbot then what I was told was a human, if the report gives you a punishment at that time when you dispute it they can determine context. Right now the rules are no matter what is said you are to remain silent and report the person.

Examples of context

You go 1-2-1 and you just had your second death and you feel bad for letting the team down....

Aggressor: "Hey idiot you suck at this game and you should uninstall" Punished: "Cool it man, you're the one feeding and not playing with the team, you're 0-4! Stop talking"

I would say this is very subtle and certainly in line with the tone or context of the conversation started by someone else.

So if you take away what the aggressor said lets call him a troll the punished is clearly being toxic. If you add the fact that punished is replying to a troll then context is now clearly showing that the punished is just stating facts and actually trying to get the troll to stop talking making the game LESS toxic in the long run. I know this ONE example wouldn't get you banned however over the course of a 40 minute game with simple exchanges along with the possibility of more people becoming toxic towards you it can can add up and even though you are clearly reacting to abuse you will be punished with no remorse or sympathy. I don't know what kind of environment they are trying to create but teaching people to be abused, stay silent and report sounds like a terrible community that would get stomped on irl.

I understand one liners can disrupt a game but there is a mute option, I should be able to shut trolls down verbally when they are trying to be mean to me and you simply can't because when you take away context three people can gang up on one person and that one person is probably the most likely to be punished.

TrulyBland1 votes

Frankly, I hate the "context doesn't matter" blanket statement people use so often. But primarily because it's simply not true.

I've seen people being unbanned that were "blackmailed" into saying slurs (i.e. "say the N-word twice or I feed"), people being unbanned for saying inappropriate things and being jokingly reported by their friends, people being unbanned for telling somebody to kill themselves when they meant for them to suicide into the tower on ARAM.

I've seen people having their punishments removed or reduced based on context a lot.

The only context which does not matter at all is what other people did to "provoke" you into flaming. I've never seen a case where flaming helped with the underlying problem, and I've seen plenty of cases where somebody who "defended" themselves wound up being equally or even more annoying than the instigator.

If you do not have the self control to keep yourself from flaming other players you contribute to the toxicity problem. That is true whether you start flaming players because they are having a bad game, whether you start flaming players because they troll, or whether you start flaming players because they flame.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

Frankly, I hate the "context doesn't matter" blanket statement people use so often. But primarily because it's simply not true.

I've seen people being unbanned that were "blackmailed" into saying slurs (i.e. "say the N-word twice or I feed"), people being unbanned for saying inappropriate things and being jokingly reported by their friends, people being unbanned for telling somebody to kill themselves when they meant for them to suicide into the tower on ARAM.

I've seen people having their punishments removed or reduced based on context a lot.

The only context which does not matter at all is what other people did to "provoke" you into flaming. I've never seen a case where flaming helped with the underlying problem, and I've seen plenty of cases where somebody who "defended" themselves wound up being equally or even more annoying than the instigator.

If you do not have the self control to keep yourself from flaming other players you contribute to the toxicity problem. That is true whether you start flaming players because they are having a bad game, whether you start flaming players because they troll, or whether you start flaming players because they flame.

You just gave an example of someone forcing you to say something bad or they will troll then said that context doesn't come in to play if you're provoked into flaming. If they find that even though you were defending yourself that you were still an annoyance then sure keep the ban. I've personally have had situations where 3 people from the team bashed me like trolls and played very poorly. I nearly carried the team in these games and responded to their trash talk with "kindness" the 5th player on my team honored me for nearly winning and he felt bad i got trash talked so bad. the other three reported me and when context was taken out of the equation i was found to still only be mildly toxic, add context and I'm not toxic at all. I was told that because i was punished in the past even though my behavior was very mild and wouldn't normally be a punishment if i had a clean record, they punished.

TrulyBland1 votes

There's a significant difference between provoking and coercing.

You are also assuming the very thing your argument aims to support, that somehow the context changed your actions from mildly toxic to not toxic. But it doesn't.

If you do not have the self control to retaliate when people flame you, mute them. You have no right to retaliate when there are objectively better solutions available to you that do not add to the toxic atmosphere.

Hemulen Magi3 votes

You've realized a truth which is out of reach to most people. You are right. You should not take sadistic pleasure from others' misfortune or punishment, even if inflicting the punishment is necessary/pragmatic to prevent further harm. If you must hang someone, because you can't let them go free and you can't afford/risk keeping them imprisoned, then you should do so somberly. You shouldn't put on a show and have people gather around at a hanging as a form of public entertainment.

R107 Games3 votes

I hope those reports aren't against flamers. It's not really fair to get a flamer punished, since you could've muted them anytime.

Solving problems by ourselves without relying on other people(Riot in this case), are how we grow as people. And we have a more inclusive environment if we learn to tolerate speech we disagree with, and not ban people that are speaking their minds

Saezio1 votes

[deleted]

R107 Games1 votes

{quoted}

I enjoy the gas, but how stupid does one have to be to not be able to follow simple rules?

This is not really true for some people. They may have came from a different game that didn't have chat rules that were strict, or they didn't think things like criticising, being sarcastic, banter etc. could be something that is against the rules, because it sounds ridiculous.

MustardTigerMK2 votes

The rules also take away a lot from the freedom of speech act circa 1892. That's in violation of being American so I move to vote that the NA server loosens up chat rules and restrictions.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

Also the severity of the punishments are never realized until it was too late. Nobody reads rules or regulations, I didn't pick up a game so I could sign a contract, I picked it up to let loose and enjoy myself.

Finish this phrase

I love h_ _ _ _ _ _ and blow.

See? you're toxic too irl......just not when you're letting loose playing vids.

Light Burner1 votes

{quoted}

Well, maybe flamers shouldn't act like they are mentally challenged and pick up a game that has rules they are not planning to withhold. xD Not saying I like flamers getting punished, I enjoy the gas, but how stupid does one have to be to not be able to follow simple rules?

ikr i ban my teammates champ then take their next pick and when they flame me i report them and they get punished while i laugh i enjoyed the game watched them rage and they got punished why not just follow simple rules.

Sukishoo1 votes

I hope they are. Flamers have no place in this game. Muting stops you from seeing it, yes, but not everyone does mute them. So, reporting helps to get rid of it completely.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

Yeah ban 30% of people from your game, they'll make more accounts and make the game seem more popular. Don't you get it man? RIOT wants you banned? ahahhahahahahahahahahahhaha jk.

Light Burner1 votes

{quoted}

I hope they are. Flamers have no place in this game. Muting stops you from seeing it, yes, but not everyone does mute them. So, reporting helps to get rid of it completely.

But its okay to troll right? You cant mute that but thats not bannable lmaooo

MustardTigerMK1 votes

that's a solid point but then I wouldn't get the joy from knowing I got someone punished...muahhahaha

Sirsir3 votes

I mean you're getting them punished for a reason, right? Now that person can't ruin any more games for awhile.

Its not a 'yes, I got my revenge!' feeling, its a 'now he can't hurt anyone anymore' feeling.

Madjack012 votes

It's perfectly natural to feel good about seeing someone get punished and it's in being honest about those feelings and reflecting on them that they become ethical.

In fact feeling good about punishments is part of our judicial systems. When someone breaks the rules, rules you adhere to, it devalues those rules and inspires a sense of unfairness and diminishes the trust people have in the system. When someone gets punished, it reaffirms a spectator's/victim's believe in the rules. It gives a person confirmation that an unfairness has been corrected and that society supports them and what they believe to be right or wrong.

In that light it would actually be more rare to not feel good, especially when you are the victim.

The scales are not the same, but reporting and punishing in LoL is not that different in that regard.

JayceGatsby1 votes

YES

thats why I report everybody after every game. God... I mean riot will recognize their own.

Totally Worth It1 votes

First you have to consider how often you report players and how often they report you (this is assuming you are toxic - chances are you aren't). You report a ton of players. You might see that message once every so often - Riot only displays it for 10% of all reports submitted by you that result in punishment. This is meant to encourage you to continue reporting people because (as you saw from the message), the system caught someone because of your report.

That being said, you don't remember any of your reports, so you don't know who got punished - therefore there's no reason to feel good or bad about it. I would encourage you to not feel good about it as that can encourage you to report vengefully (which is no bueno). But you can show gratitude to them for acknowledging your efforts to help them catch a misbehaving player. That's appropriate in my book.

As for me, those messages create anxiety for me as I've been permanently banned 6 times and I'm still trying to reform. I've gotten a ton better but I'm always afraid of slipping and getting in trouble.

Vreivai1 votes

If you're deriving pleasure from the punishment of another player, you probably reported them for the wrong reason.

And in fact I think the system encouraging reporting for the schadenfreude is part of how the system got so draconian in the first place.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

{quoted}

If you're deriving pleasure from the punishment of another player, you probably reported them for the wrong reason.

And in fact I think the system encouraging reporting for the schadenfreude is part of how the system got so draconian in the first place.

Quick fix is to take away notifications to eliminate that.

If they want to keep players informed about people actually being punished then release a report on the number of reports globally compared to the number of punishments do a pie chart and release it online end season which would make it not personalized but also let people know the report system works.

Vreivai1 votes

I don't think that'd work, because it'd likely create the false impression that the punishment system is not working due to a likely abundance of frivolous reports.

Tahngarthor1 votes

The appropriate response is to feel good about doing the right thing, rather than specifically feeling good because someone was punished. I.e. if you're trying to find every oppertunity to get someone in trouble so you can go "YES, I GOT THAT GUY!" you're probably doing it for the wrong reasons. Of course, they wouldn't have been punished if the case wasn't legitimate, so regardless of how you feel, something came of it.

TrulyBland1 votes

I understand what you are trying to say, but I think it's not really fair to say that the system creates a want to punish people. Rather than that it is the toxic players which create a want to punish them, and the system merely scratches that itch.

But that's inevitable. A punishment system will always help people get their vengeance on somebody who wronged them. As long as that is not its goal, however, I'd say that it's not really a flaw in the system. Even the message that somebody has been punished doesn't aim to do that, it only aims to give people an occasional proof that the system works.

Besides, phrased like that it becomes clear why feeling happy that somebody was punished is not inherently wrong. Or would you say it's wrong to be happy that a criminal is convicted of their crimes? Those thoughts are problematic only if they focus only on that person's misery; at least in my opinion.

Pandemic Punch1 votes

I had an instance where someone called me a "hate speech" word. I replied with one of my own and it was the only insult that I typed in the entire match. Meanwhile, they continually said the hate speech word and continually kept insulting me for the duration of the match. A 2nd person also jumped in and started using the hate speech word repeatedly and insulted me repeatedly for the entire duration of the match.

I got a 2-week ban as my first punishment ever on a 7 year old account. The primary instigator who committed the same offense and repeatedly used it while insulting me for the entire duration, did NOT get punished. Their account remained active. All of the proof is in my support tickets as well as other links that I provided where my 1 insult got a more severe punishment compared to another player in a different match who insulted their entire team constantly while using words like %%%%%% and %%%%%%.

Perhaps if the system was a bit more consistent or "just", the specialists who posted in this thread might have a decent point. But when events like mine happen so regularly, their points have no leg to stand on. The only message I get from this is that I can trust in the system being on my side as long as I am MORE toxic and as long as I am the primary instigator.

You don't need to look at my story that happened two years ago. Just check out a certain bait banning discord for more evidence ;-)

MustardTigerMK1 votes

Hate speech ain't alright in my books.

Schoenberg1 votes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

We all experience it from time to time and elements of sadism aren't incredibly uncommon.

Is it... right? The act itself is very healthy for league's community. As for taking pleasure in another's suffering? I think it's fine, too, so long as you aren't intentionally trying to bring out the worst in those folks. Keep in mind that both are very human, but society is the context and the act is what matters.

You could have the urges of say, a serial killer, but so long as you don't act on them and do your best for society, I say you deserve to be treated as a human being. Or you could have the urges of say, a serial killer, and then choose to act on them. That's a different story.

MustardTigerMK1 votes

Provoke works just the same pal.

So in a game where three people are trolling(playing badly and talking trash) and the 4th person on my team feels so bad he honors me for how I handled it, you're okay with taking away that context and punishing the person. But you're not okay with someone getting punished for being coerced into saying hate speech lol.....people in league are F

ZackTheWaffleMan1 votes

It entirely depends on why you feel good.

Do you feel satisfied that there is now one less toxic player in this game, at least for a bit? Do you feel glad that they won't ruin anyone else's games (until they make another account)? If yes, then that's fine.

However, if you feel good about it because of the punishment itself, because they lost all of their skins/rank/champs/et cetera, then that's not a good thing.

Hocker1 votes

If they actually deserve it... hell ya I feel good.

More from Player Behavior

More by MustardTigerMK