20 Comments
Remaking your thread isn't gonna give you a different answer.
You made 3 threads about the same thing? It is a chat restriction it's nothing major mate, why are you so upset? Yeah you might not have been toxic, but supposedly all you can say in chat is either productive strategies and calls, encouraging your team and healthy banter towards the enemy. Wouldn't you say that some of your logs would not fit in any of those 3 categories? It is just a chat ban i repeat. Just take it like a slap to the wrist as to not become toxic in the future. I find the whole definition of "toxicity" by riot to be very flawed but those are the rules and we can't do much about it. I would rather if none was banned for toxicity since there is a mute button.
i just dont get why venting to an intentional feeder who tried to ruin my game is considered punishable i asked multiple rioters a couple said that game wasnt toxic and one said that game was half toxic and he never specified where when i posted the chat logs.
game two i was a little toxic. i lagged and bitched about it to warn my team about my condition. lagging while being the only one ahead is very stressful. having someone flame you while having the game on your shoulders and lagging is even more stressful im sorry to everyone who may disagree with how ive put my information forward. but theres alot more under the surface than just the immediate chat logs you see.
if you were to put yourselves in my shoes and have this happen to you this frequently because once you hit d5 mmr its the most boosted area of league by far. you have nothing but toxicity every game intentional feeders and flaming one tricks every game. its not fair that even how minor my offense is that its punishable. i get why it may be punishable. but only punishable thing was my 3 minutes of afking i feel, but that wasnt the reason. the reason that ive come up with through riot is for acknowledging toxicity and speaking up about it. 2 rioters said i didnt break article 5 of tos, 2 said i broke article 5 and 1 said i didnt really break article 5 but i was objectionable which in itself is contradictory to what 2 other rioters said. since at the start i was restricted for obscene abhorrent chat flagged by players. but ive been told by 3/5 rioters that it wasnt for that.