Boards›Player Behavior

The whole " x% non toxic people win more games" is bull.

BIackfox·2/2/2017, 6:04:19 PM·7 votes·3,413 views

Excluding there is no proof it's ridiculous. I am doing a full experiment as a toxic player to not say anything in chat and see if I "win more games" and so far? Not so good. 2 games today.

I had one Draven flaming the fuck out of his support which he should have since I believe he was honestly trolling because I didn't give him mid (unranked with only 5 ranked games, no chance) we somehow won that game even though he was you know toxic.

Second game, started out like shit and we were coming back and again I said nothing and didn't flame my teammates like I usually would for sucking dick. So then guess what happened? Had our jger flame the adc although it wasn't even that bad not like the Draven like last game. The adc was also flaming a bit earlier the jg as well but jg didn't say that much. So adc cries about kha zix hurt his feels and that he got no ganks and afk farmed the rest of the game and keep pushing and dying and lost us the game. Lmfao.

So yeah, total bullshit. Back to flaming

79 Comments

ModUlanopo2/2/2017, 6:21:25 PM12 votes

http://i.imgur.com/vJqzVP2.jpg[/img]

Two games is not a meaningful sample size, but I'm pretty sure you knew that.

Kalikko2/2/2017, 6:05:46 PM9 votes

Riot's data is over millions of matches of players of vastly different skill levels.

Yours is not.

AeroWaffle2/2/2017, 8:15:22 PM5 votes

Had our jger flame the adc although it wasn't even that bad not like the Draven like last game. The adc was also flaming a bit earlier the jg as well but jg didn't say that much. So adc cries about kha zix hurt his feels and that he got no ganks and afk farmed the rest of the game and keep pushing and dying and lost us the game. Lmfao.

Doesn't this prove the point of the statistic?

That game would have likely gone better if the ADC and jungle weren't at each other's throats that game. Because they were upset with each other, they likely made some choices that disregarded benefiting the team so they could spite each other, harming their chances of winning.

You not being toxic makes it so there's one less person on your team that starts or continues the shit-storm that often tears a team apart. But it doesn't prevent them from happening entirely.

TequilaZombie2/3/2017, 10:49:45 PM4 votes

Sorry to interrupt the usual shitposting with common sense, but it has to be done:

If you are tilted you are not playing as well as you would in a calm or happy scenario.

If you are flaming or being generally toxic, you are in a tilted state. This leads you to play poorly.

If you are not speaking but it's still tilted, you're still playing poorly in comparison to your non tilted state.

If you are tilted AND flaming, you're likely to be tilting your team, leading to a the already mentioned poor plays.

As a bonus point, if you're not saying anything you're failing to communicate effectively, which leads to an overall worse team coordination.

TL;DR don't tilt and communicate

EvilDustMan2/3/2017, 1:26:41 PM3 votes

Okay, come back when you have a sample of at least 10,000 games over a large sample group of at least 20, with a record of all their punishments and honors.

Dragfin2/2/2017, 8:19:01 PM1 votes

It's more propaganda for the stupid people in the world to believe and for RIOT to continue to be as passive as too much of the world continue to be. Toxicity is bred from that which RIOT will do nothing effective to destroy permanently,( AFK's/DC's, intentional feeders, trolls and those who never improve at the game imprisoning those that do.)

ItsOrval2/3/2017, 10:29:23 PM1 votes

If toxicity makes you lose game, then why was Tyler1 able to make it to challenger? :thinking: