Not surrendering to piss off teammates

Great Muta·10/22/2016, 6:36:24 PM·2 votes·522 views

I think that not surrendering, not because you think you can win, but because you are trying to piss off teammates should be a reportable option. I see this a lot in stompings. In my last game, our mid went 0-10. We were down about 17 kills with all lanes lost and a massively fed opponent. The teammate refused to surrender citing that he wanted to extend the misery of the games as the reason. We were at a 9k gold deficit, which ended up being 16k and it was over. This is definitely a negative attitude and depending on the way it is phrased, should be considered verbal abuse. Yet another abuse of the system.

8 Comments

1wolfpack10/22/2016, 6:50:11 PM5 votes

maybe ask yourself why did this player wants to make his/her team-mates miserable. I know if I have toxic team-mates that try to tell me how to play and end up feeding all game then pointing fingers at everyone but themselves deserve to have their misery extended as long as possible.

Environmentalist10/22/2016, 6:43:49 PM3 votes

Meh, I've done this. Not when I feed, though. When a teammate feeds (usually on purpose) I'll prolong the game. A lot of the time, the winning team wants the game to go on longer, so they enjoy it, and the doofus who couldn't ward or play safely under his turret gets to revel in his own masterpiece of stupidity for longer.

Hryna10/22/2016, 7:34:01 PM1 votes

So, someone using their right to vote is offensive to you and should be shut down? What if they think you're abusive for not letting them play the game? Voting no in surrender simply means you want to keep playing; it doesn't have to be winnable.

Personally if there is anything more useful to squeeze out of the game i'll keep playing.

deathgod510/22/2016, 11:28:09 PM1 votes

In the case of above: report for negative attitude and verbal abuse. As for any other case: how do you know the difference?