@ Riot and @LoL Players: Leaver Buster Good Or Bad?
The Leave Buster is intended to resolve issues. I understand a few reasons for why it exists. It is in some ways good and bad in other ways. How practical and ethical is it?
Good:
1)I can see that it is designed to be an automaton and handle cases that otherwise would never see any resolution due to the sheer number of players and the impossibility of Riot Staff reviewing them all.
2)Having bans ensures the issue is eliminated for the period of the ban. It also acts as a negative reinforcement for certain behavior. Therefore possibly preventing future occurrence
- Helps to keep the gaming experience enjoyable for those that are not banned.
4)There are other reasons for why Leave Buster is good, please add to this list and share your opinion.
BAD:
-
Does not differentiate between intentional behavior and events out of the users control. Both categories are penalized in the same way. There are always reasons for AFK or Game leaving. Some of these are under the players control and others are not. To apply the same punishment to both cases is unethical. These cases need to have different punishments.
-
Not allowing appeals. Any system with no appeals is an unethical practice. The U.S. Court System allows appeals and it is based on Justice. There are many other reasons why not having appeals is unfair.If you want to understand why there should be an appeals process I have provided a U.S. Government link:
- As a business practice it is a very good method of losing income. If you have a player that has spent $300 on this game, they are more than likely going to spend more later. However when you ban players with no appeal you have just lost a source of income
4)There are other reasons for why Leave Buster is Bad, please add to this list and share your opinion.
I have listed some reasons for both positions on this system and I would like to see feedback from the community and the rioters. What are your opinions on the Leave Buster System?