Fair enough. A heated debate is like a woman giving birth or the core of a nature's forces reaching its apex. I admire conflict well.
Okay, so let's go about this with an easy-to-read formula:
Claim 1: "You are ignoring basic rules, because I said so." Alright, so let's see here. You insist on telling yourself that I am - no matter what - reducing myself to a correlation =/= causation fallacy. Even though, my OP and my proceeding responses contradict your claims left and right. The numbers and formulas I have provided are your scientific "middle" cheesy goodness that you want to satiate your desire over. You choose to reduce my statements based on what you can comprehend, like a child walks into a museum, not having the capacity to draw out the detail of another person's work. I explained that my formula is working outside of my senses already. If you weren't aware, the C =/= C fallacy is personal, not practical. I'm working with the practical, physical, tangible and malleable aspects of life. I demonstrated:
Planetary Implication - 0 (Moonless Mercury) 1 (Moonless Venus) 1 2 (Earth & Mars) 5 (Pluto) 14(?) (5+8f=13/Neptune) 27 (14+13f=27/Uranus) 62 (27+14+21f=62/Saturn) 70 (Jupiter) The "Solar System Was Shuffled Between Earth, Mars and Pluto For A Reason" Theory: 70 - 62 = 8. 1 + 2 + 5 = 8. The Solar System was Shuffled, that is why the planet's moons are in a weird order. When you put the planets in order of having least moons to having most moons, you will see that this theory is connecting the Planet System to the Fibonacci Sequence. Not only that, but the two are "intertwined".
In my last thread. This is the Fibonacci Sequence and the sequential number of moons for each planet in order. The numbers add up. Math is the last thing you would pin C =/= C fallacy on. Math doesn't cater to idiots and ignoramuses. If the numbers don't add up, then it's wrong - my numbers added up because I am right.
Claim 2: "You can't accept criticism given by people who have no comprehension." Well, this is self-explanatory.
Claim 3: "You are ignoring their work because you are a bad boy." Uh, no. I am not ignoring anyone's work - I am expanding on their work. Einstein did not know philosophy; Tesla did not know dreams; Junga did not know science - I know all three. (Yes, this is yet another poem I wrote because my brain is tired of explaining itself, so it's easy to explain myself now because I've done it for years).
Claim 4: "You haven't answered me - notice me Senpai!". The only Pi I care for, is 3.14. That said, I already answered you. You just don't understand what I'm saying in the first place. It's like talking to a deaf person. Your brain is not picking up on the knowledge I am granting you because you have yet to grant yourself the ability to reach this level of analysis. You're still on Theta frequency waves. I'm on Gamma waves. I have what is called "Super Knowledge". It's better than book knowledge and street knowledge - it's universal knowledge. It's obtained by mastering your abstract elements of mind and body. As well as understanding life and its two faces. Or appreciating the small life and the cosmic life. It takes three things: Omni-Reverence, Passion and Self-humility.
Claim 5: "This isn't even your final form." Well, yes. I have more to learn, but frankly I am so far into the Universe's rabbit hole, that you can't even make out my voice when I speak to you from deep within the threshold of space and matter. You are light years behind me in knowledge. As I said before, I know this Universe more than you ever will at this rate you go in. I want you to transcend and to break free from your petty shell, but that's your own personal journey that I will not force. My information is simply a guidance. I have control over the electromagnetic waves - and so, I have control over people's compasses.
Conclusion: C =/= C fallacy grants opposing parties the ammunition they need to call you out. You cannot call me out, for my theory does not have any flaws you can comprehend - likewise for facts
