@Riot: The AdellaideSkyhart V. Riot Case

Presented here is likely the most important point of contention the game will ever see. This is the Brown V. Board of Education of League Of Legends, and like the famous case, the final statements on this will set a massive precedent over the game that will affect everyone in the community. its important, so lets talk about it.

A singed main, rather the singed main with the highest mastery points on his champ, an above 50% winrate, and clear evidence of general sportsmanship in his games (rare i know), greatly enjoys going off meta on his champion roles and general stratedgy. he takes smite, and counter jungles at lv 1 to set back the enemy jungle --burn a flash, pressure an early smite miss, or just straight up steal camps-- then roams for a gank on another lane, and finally goes back to his adc for the rest of the match.

Now he gets reported by his teammates, THE ADC's likely as they dont like the fact that to do this strat he isnt in bot-lane for those crucial early lvs nvm the extra exp that 2 v 1 lanes would give.

the main conflict is this has brought to head is, the question of whether we the players are truly free to play off meta, and develop our own ways to play and win our games.

so what do yall think?

Does the Singed Main, DO WE, have the Right To Innovate?

Or Is The Singed Main Wrong, DO WE, have to keep ourselves from Straying From the Meta? and is doing either a BANNABLE OFFENSE?

the answers to these questions will change the game forever, chose your words carefully.