Toxicity had the exact opposite effect on player performance as the toxic player intends it to
I was watching brain games the other night and the study at the end of the show reminded me of the toxic nature of some players and the effects that it has on the victim of the behavior. I'll add the link the clip relevant to the post starts at 18:20.
If you don't feel like watching a quick 5 minute clip I'll summarize it in a few quick sentences (skip this paragraph if you watched the clip). The study uses the once popular children's game perfection (a game where you had 1 minute to fit 20 shapes in their corresponding holes in the game board, when the timer is a spring under the board launches all the pieces out). During the first trial the host berated the subjects with negative comments while they were playing, and only 20% of subjects completed the game. During the second set of trails the host used positive statements to encourage the participants to succeed. In this set of trails 80% or participants completed the game.
So when a player berates their team with negative comments it is likely to effect their gameplay in negative fashion. This is contradictory to the objective of any normal team (to win). I see a lot of posts on the forum complaining about their teams being feeders and they have the right to be angry because that's the normal reaction when someone is competitive and loses. I suggest we as a community instead of lashing out at these people try and motivate them to do better using encouraging statements. Maybe this will help and maybe it won't, but at the very least it won't exacerbate the issue.
I'm open to discussion and debate on this topic.