So I'm currently bronze II but I should be silver within a few weeks. I'm at 95 lp and this the farthest I've been. If I put my time into it, I could make gold. I'm actually kind of basing this off of csgo where master guardian where you start to be callred a good players but you still can't compare to pro players in lem, global supreme, or global elite. Is that the canse in lol with gold.
No elo is good. I have been to every elo from bronze 3 to Diamond 1, not one is "good". A good player tho, yes high gold would be good. Meaning if you went on a smurf account when your main is Gold 2 then you should be back to gold pretty easy.
Short answer: No it's terrible Long answer: You're in the top 30% of all players in your server
I mean... Its worth getting to, Mainly because you can look back and say "I made an improvement"
But in reality, 90% of low elo climbing is a mix of luck, And knowing what champions can effect the game the most.
And down to it, IMO, Its not worth the stress.
No, everyone with X hours can reach Gold.
Source: me, gold IV
Yes, it is relatively good elo to be gold. It is good if you are platinum. But If you want to be very good, I think you need to be diamond or above. If you want to be absolutely good, you need to be master or challenger.
Gold is a good elo. Necro'ing is a bad elo. It's worse than Wood Division! To prevent any of us from being demoted to Necro elo, I'm gonna lock this thread up.
[poppy-wink]
