https://i.imgur.com/qVREeKb.png/img
https://i.imgur.com/GJRrii7.jpg/img
https://i.imgur.com/Lohd6Bw.jpg/img
https://i.imgur.com/yO8iQxz.jpg/img
https://i.imgur.com/J2UjWcj.jpg/img
I take no credit in finding this and here's the source I found it from -
https://imgur.com/gallery/VpdEe
^A imgur gallery link^
Just doing my part
Corporate scumfucks gonna scumfuck.
I want to point out that using his argument, that according to him, books should be worth 80 to 100 dollars then.
I don't know what you are trying to say here, all the stories that used his quote reported him as an analyst, there was nothing to "find" it was public knowledge. However, I feel like you don't know what an analyst really is. As an analyst he is not an employee of EA he follows them to report on expected earnings and makes recommendations to stock market participants. So of course he sits in, and by sits in means he is on the conference call, where all analysts are participating in the Q&A, which they use to help make their earnings estimates. While I am not sure of EA's exact policies, most conference calls are open to the public, or at least any shareholder, so sitting in on one really isn't much a big deal. You may disagree with his statements but he was just stating to his clients, stockholders or potential stockholders, why he thinks EA's stock will be worth what he has projected it to be. That isn't really news, just a third party analyst doing his job. And to be fair to his opinion, he does spend a significant portion of his professional life studying the ins and outs of the industry. That doesn't make him correct, but he is not making a baseless claim.
Fake news
do the same to riot greedy fukers
"""Financial Analyst"""
What did you expect?
Not surprised tbh
