Why do so many in Player Behaviour have the assumption that intentional feeders aren't banned?
None of them shows any evidence that this is the case.
None of them comes with counter-arguments when somebody proves them wrong.
It boggles my mind.
5 Comments
Because intentional feeding isn't readily detectable by an automated system unless you use extreme, black and white cases.
Because they only see chat related punishments doled out. Because people constantly post, and sometime repost, threads on here about how often people are chat banned, some players came to the assumption that inting wasn't punished based solely on having a troll in a game a few times.
This leads to a feedback loop fueled by confirmation bias, where x players still hav feeders in their matches but chat toxic players are being banned so Riot must be focusing on the chat related issues and not the int related ones. Which is partially true because Riot has stated that they try to be careful to ban players intentionally feeding and not for bad games, which means that smart inters last longer than most and fuels that feedback loop more. This causes players to last out, post threads like "Riot only cares about chat, not the troll problem" and it adds more fuel to a fire that is really bright but not as fierce as some describe.
Because they are not.
cuz most people think intentional feeding is the same thing as playing bad
and its not they want any one who played bad to be banned